Supreme Court of Japan


The Supreme Court of Japan 最高裁判所, Saikō-Saibansho, called 最高裁 Saikō-Sai for short, located in Hayabusachō, Chiyoda, Tokyo, is the highest court in Japan It has ultimate judicial authority to interpret the Japanese constitution and decide questions of national law including local bylaws It has the power of judicial review; that is, it can declare Acts of the National Diet, local assemblies, and administrative actions, to be unconstitutional

Contents

  • 1 History
  • 2 Appointment and organization
  • 3 Judicial review of laws
  • 4 Current justices
  • 5 Former justices
  • 6 See also
  • 7 Footnotes
  • 8 External links

Historyedit

The Rules of the Supreme Court, 1947 After US occupation force left Japan, most of its rules became those of the closed documents

The first Western-style supreme court in Japan was the Supreme Court of Judicature 大審院, Dai-shin'in organized by the Ministry of Justice in 1875 This court was composed of 120 judges in both civil and criminal divisions Five judges would be empaneled for any given case The criminal division of the court was the court of first instance for crimes against the Emperor eg lèse majesté and for high crimes against public order

The statute creating the Court was abolished in 1947, and the modern Supreme Court was formed that year under the constitution of 1947 The new court was first convened in May 1947 in the former Privy Council quarters of the Tokyo Imperial Palace It moved to the Tokyo District Court building in September, then assumed the former quarters of the Supreme Court of Judicature in October 1949

Newly established Constitution and the Rules of the Supreme Court allowed the court to have dominating power to make comment to the law and to select its official precedents by the Case Selection Committee, as well as to autonomously govern judges Hosokai 法曹界, the lawyers association which had been stipulating the rules of sentencing and judgement within judges, public prosecutors and attorneys, remained too

After US occupation force left Japan, it's rules became one of the closed documents to the public, except being seen in gazette

In 1974, the Supreme Court moved to its current five-story building at 4-2 Hayabusa-cho, Chiyoda, Tokyo The building was designed by architect Shinichi Okada and won the Architecture Institute of Japan Prize for Design

Appointment and organizationedit

Façade of the Supreme Court building The Grand Bench

The Article 81 of the constitution designates it as "the court of last resort with power to determine the constitutionality of any law, order, regulation, or official act" The Supreme Court is also responsible for nominating judges to lower courts, determining judicial procedures, overseeing the judicial system, including the activities of public prosecutors, and disciplining judges and other judicial personnel It renders decisions from either a grand bench of fifteen justices or a petit bench of five The grand bench is required for cases involving constitutionality The court includes 34 research clerks, whose function is similar to that of the clerks of the United States Supreme Court

The Chief Justice is nominated by the Cabinet and appointed to office by the Emperor

The associate justices are appointed by the Cabinet in attestation of the Emperor

After appointment, Supreme Court justices are subject to a "people's review": an automatic retention referendum in which the voters may remove the judge from office A people's review occurs at the first election to the House of Representatives after a justice assumes office, when the question of whether his tenure should continue is put to voters on the ballot The Supreme Court justice is then subject to a further people's review at the first lower house election after every ten years The system used resembles the Missouri Plan followed in some US states It is established by Article 79 of the constitution which includes the following provisions:

As of October 2009update, no Supreme Court justice has ever been dismissed by a people's review It is also unusual for a justice to be subject to a second review, as most are over the age of sixty when appointed and there is mandatory retirement at seventy1

Judicial review of lawsedit

Japan
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Japan
Constitution
  • The Constitution
    • History
  • Laws
The Monarchy
  • Emperor list
    • Akihito
  • Crown Prince
    • Naruhito
  • Imperial House
  • Imperial Household Agency
Legislature
  • National Diet
    • House of Representatives
      • Speaker
        • Tadamori Oshima
      • Vice-Speaker
        • Tatsuo Kawabata
    • House of Councillors
      • President
        • Masaaki Yamazaki
      • Vice-President
        • Azuma Koshiishi
    • Leader of the Opposition
      • Katsuya Okada
Executive
  • Prime Minister list
    • Shinzō Abe
  • Deputy Prime Minister
    • Tarō Asō
  • Government
    • Cabinet
    • Ministries
    • Administrative Agencies
Judiciary
  • Chief Justice list
    • Itsurō Terada
  • Supreme Court
  • Intellectual Property High Court
Administrative Divisions
  • Prefectures
    • Governors list
  • Subprefectures
  • Districts
  • Municipalities
    • Mergers and Dissolutions
  • Submunicipalities
Elections
  • House of Councillors
      • 2007
      • 2010
      • 2013
      • 2016
  • House of Representatives
      • 2005
      • 2009
      • 2012
      • 2014
  • Next General Election
Political parties
  • Major parties
    • Liberal Democratic
    • Democratic
    • Kōmeitō
  • Other parties
Foreign relations
  • Foreign policy
Related topics
  • National Police
    • Imperial Guard
    • Special Assault Team
  • Self-Defense Force
    • Air
    • Ground
    • Maritime
Japan portal
  • Other countries
  • Atlas
  • v
  • e

The Supreme Court is the only Japanese court explicitly empowered to review the constitutionality of laws, although it has held that lower courts also have power to interpret the constitution2 Unlike constitutional courts in other civil law countries, it only exercises judicial review in cases where there is a genuine dispute between parties, and does not accept questions of constitutionality from government officials3

The Supreme Court is generally reluctant to exercise the powers of judicial review given to it by the constitution, in large part because of unwillingness to become involved in politically sensitive issues When decisions have been rendered on such matters as the constitutionality of the Self-Defense Forces, the sponsorship of Shinto ceremonies by public authorities, or the authority of the Ministry of Education to determine the content of school textbooks or teaching curricula, the Court has generally deferred to the government4

One important exception to this trend was a series of rulings on the unconstitutionality of the electoral district apportionment system Although the Court ruled in 1964 that legislative districting was largely a matter of legislative policy, it ruled in the 1976 case of Kurokawa v Chiba Prefecture Election Control Commission, that a 5:1 discrepancy in the voter-to-representative ratio between two districts was an unconstitutional violation of the right to an equal vote5 Nonetheless the Diet has repeatedly failed to keep malapportionment within the limits set forth in Kurokawa6 Aside from electoral matters, provisions declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court have included rules6

  • Punishing patricide more harshly than other homicides
  • Restricting pharmacies from doing business close to one another
  • Limiting the liability of the postal service for the loss of registered mail
  • Restricting subdivision of property by joint owners of forest land
  • Restricting the right of citizenship of certain illegitimate children

One critic of the court writes that:

The Supreme Court of Japan has been described as the most conservative constitutional court in the world, and for good reason Since its creation in 1947 the court has struck down only eight statutes on constitutional grounds By way of comparison, Germany’s constitutional court, which was established several years later, has struck down over 600 laws The majority of the Japanese Supreme Court’s rulings of unconstitutionality have, moreover, been less than momentous The high point of judicial review in Japan is probably a 1976 decision rejecting a legislative apportionment scheme yet the Court refrained in that case from ordering any remedy6

Current justicesedit

The current justices are:7

  • ^ "Editorial: Review of Top Justices" Asahi Shimbun 2009-08-27 Archived from the original on October 1, 2009 Retrieved 2009-10-15 
  • ^ Food Staple Management Law Constitutionality Case, 4 Minshu 73 1950
  • ^ National Police Reserve Constitutionality Case, 6 Minshu 783 1952
  • ^ Bolz, Herbert F 1980 "Judicial Review in Japan: The Strategy of Restraint" Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 4 87 
  • ^ Bailey, William Somers 1997 "Reducing Malapportionment in Japan's Electoral Districts: The Supreme Court Must Act" Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 6 169 
  • ^ a b c Law, David S 2009 "The Anatomy of a Conservative Court: Judicial Review in Japan" Texas Law Review 87: 1545 SSRN 1406169  
  • ^ "Justices of the Supreme Court" Supreme Court of Japan 2006 Retrieved 2010-05-03 
  • ^ "IZUMI, Tokuji" Supreme Court of Japan Accessed February 12, 2009
  • ^ "SHIMADA, Niro" Supreme Court of Japan Accessed November 2, 2008
  • ^ a b c d "Justices of the Supreme Court" Supreme Court of Japan June 17, 2006
  • External linksedit

    • Supreme Court of Japan


    Supreme Court of Japan Information about


    Supreme Court of Japan
    Supreme Court of Japan

    Supreme Court of Japan Information Video


    Supreme Court of Japan viewing the topic.
    Supreme Court of Japan what, Supreme Court of Japan who, Supreme Court of Japan explanation

    There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video