Thu . 20 Jun 2020
TR | RU | UK | KK | BE |


plagiarism checker, plagiarism
Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work The idea remains problematic with unclear definitions and unclear rules The modern concept of plagiarism as immoral and originality as an ideal emerged in Europe only in the 18th century, particularly with the Romantic movement

Plagiarism is considered academic dishonesty and a breach of journalistic ethics It is subject to sanctions like penalties, suspension, and even expulsion Recently, cases of 'extreme plagiarism' have been identified in academia

Plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but can constitute copyright infringement In academia and industry, it is a serious ethical offense Plagiarism and copyright infringement overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts, and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts Plagiarism is not defined or punished by law, but rather by institutions including professional associations, educational institutions, and commercial entities, such as publishing companies


  • 1 Etymology
  • 2 Legal aspects
  • 3 In academia and journalism
    • 31 Academia
      • 311 Common forms of student plagiarism
      • 312 Sanctions for student plagiarism
      • 313 Plagiarism education
      • 314 Factors influencing student´s decision to plagiarize
    • 32 Journalism
    • 33 Self-plagiarism
      • 331 The concept
      • 332 Codes of ethics
      • 333 Factors that justify reuse
    • 34 Organizational publications
  • 4 In the arts
    • 41 The history of the arts
    • 42 Praisings of artistic plagiarism
  • 5 In other contexts
    • 51 On the Internet
  • 6 See also
  • 7 References
  • 8 Works cited
  • 9 Further reading
  • 10 External links


In the 1st century, the use of the Latin word plagiarius literally kidnapper to denote stealing someone else's work was pioneered by the Roman poet Martial, who complained that another poet had "kidnapped his verses" "Plagiary", a derivative of "plagiarus" was introduced into English in 1601 by dramatist Ben Jonson to describe someone guilty of literary theft

The derived form plagiarism was introduced into English around 1620 The Latin plagiārius, "kidnapper", and plagium, "kidnapping", has the root plaga "snare", "net", based on the Indo-European root -plak, "to weave" seen for instance in Greek plekein, Bulgarian "плета" pleta, Latin plectere, all meaning "to weave"

Legal aspects

Although plagiarism in some contexts is considered theft or stealing, the concept does not exist in a legal sense, although the use of someone elses work in order to gain academic credit may meet some legal definitions of fraud "Plagiarism" specifically is not mentioned in any current statute, either criminal or civil Some cases may be treated as unfair competition or a violation of the doctrine of moral rights The increased availability of intellectual property due to a rise in technology has furthered the debate as to whether copyright offences are criminal In short, people are asked to use the guideline, "if you did not write it yourself, you must give credit"

Plagiarism is not the same as copyright infringement While both terms may apply to a particular act, they are different concepts, and false claims of authorship may constitute plagiarism regardless of whether the material is protected by copyright Copyright infringement is a violation of the rights of a copyright holder, when material whose use is restricted by copyright is used without consent Plagiarism, in contrast, is concerned with the unearned increment to the plagiarizing author's reputation, or the obtaining of academic credit, that is achieved through false claims of authorship Thus, plagiarism is considered a moral offense against the plagiarist's audience for example, a reader, listener, or teacher

Plagiarism is also considered a moral offense against anyone who has provided the plagiarist with a benefit in exchange for what is specifically supposed to be original content for example, the plagiarist's publisher, employer, or teacher In such cases, acts of plagiarism may sometimes also form part of a claim for breach of the plagiarist's contract, or, if done knowingly, for a civil wrong

In academia and journalism

Within academia, plagiarism by students, professors, or researchers is considered academic dishonesty or academic fraud, and offenders are subject to academic censure, up to and including expulsion Many institutions use plagiarism detection software to uncover potential plagiarism and to deter students from plagiarizing However, the practice of plagiarizing by use of sufficient word substitutions to elude detention software, known as rogeting, has rapidly evolved as students and unethical academics seek to stay ahead of detection software An extreme form of plagiarism, known as contract cheating involves students paying someone else, such as an essay mill, to do their work for them

In journalism, plagiarism is considered a breach of journalistic ethics, and reporters caught plagiarizing typically face disciplinary measures ranging from suspension to termination of employment Some individuals caught plagiarizing in academic or journalistic contexts claim that they plagiarized unintentionally, by failing to include quotations or give the appropriate citation While plagiarism in scholarship and journalism has a centuries-old history, the development of the Internet, where articles appear as electronic text, has made the physical act of copying the work of others much easier

Predicated upon an expected level of learning/comprehension having been achieved, all associated academic accreditation becomes seriously undermined if plagiarism is allowed to become the norm within academic submissions

For professors and researchers, plagiarism is punished by sanctions ranging from suspension to termination, along with the loss of credibility and perceived integrity Charges of plagiarism against students and professors are typically heard by internal disciplinary committees, by which students and professors have agreed to be bound Plagiarism is a common reason for academic research papers to be retracted


One form of academic plagiarism involves appropriating a published article and modifying it slightly to avoid suspicion

No universally adopted definition of academic plagiarism exists; however, this section provides several definitions to exemplify the most common characteristics of academic plagiarism

According to Bela Gipp academic plagiarism encompasses:

"The use of ideas, concepts, words, or structures
without appropriately acknowledging the source
to benefit in a setting where originality is expected"

The definition by B Gipp is an abridged version of Teddi Fishman's definition of plagiarism, which proposed five elements characteristic of plagiarism According to T Fishman, plagiarism occurs when someone:

  1. Uses words, ideas, or work products
  2. Attributable to another identifiable person or source
  3. Without attributing the work to the source from which it was obtained
  4. In a situation in which there is a legitimate expectation of original authorship
  5. In order to obtain some benefit, credit, or gain which need not be monetary

Furthermore, plagiarism is defined differently among institutions of higher learning and universities:

  • Stanford sees plagiarism as the "use, without giving reasonable and appropriate credit to or acknowledging the author or source, of another person's original work, whether such work is made up of code, formulas, ideas, language, research, strategies, writing or other form"
  • Yale views plagiarism as the " use of another's work, words, or ideas without attribution," which includes " using a source's language without quoting, using information from a source without attribution, and paraphrasing a source in a form that stays too close to the original"
  • Princeton perceives plagiarism as the "deliberate" use of "someone else's language, ideas, or other original not common-knowledge material without acknowledging its source"
  • Oxford College of Emory University characterizes plagiarism as the use of "a writer's ideas or phraseology without giving due credit"
  • Brown defines plagiarism as " appropriating another person's ideas or words spoken or written without attributing those word or ideas to their true source"

Common forms of student plagiarism

According to "The Reality and Solution of College Plagiarism" created by the Health Informatics department of the University of Illinois at Chicago there are 10 main forms of plagiarism that students commit:

  1. Submitting someone's work as their own
  2. Taking passages from their own previous work without adding citations
  3. Re-writing someone's work without properly citing sources
  4. Using quotations, but not citing the source
  5. Interweaving various sources together in the work without citing
  6. Citing some, but not all passages that should be cited
  7. Melding together cited and uncited sections of the piece
  8. Providing proper citations, but fails to change the structure and wording of the borrowed ideas enough
  9. Inaccurately citing the source
  10. Relying too heavily on other people's work Fails to bring original thought into the text

Sanctions for student plagiarism

In the academic world, plagiarism by students is usually considered a very serious offense that can result in punishments such as a failing grade on the particular assignment, the entire course, or even being expelled from the institution Generally, the punishment increases as a person enters higher institutions of learning The seriousness with which academic institutions address student plagiarism may be tempered by a recognition that students may not fully understand what plagiarism is A 2015 study showed that students who were new to university study did not have a good understanding of even the basic requirements of how to attribute sources in written academic work, yet students were very confident that they understood what referencing and plagiarism are The same students also had a lenient view of how plagiarism should be penalised

For cases of repeated plagiarism, or for cases in which a student commits severe plagiarism eg, purchasing an assignment, suspension or expulsion is likely There has been historic concern about inconsistencies in penalties administered for university student plagiarism, and a plagiarism tariff was devised in 2008 for UK higher education institutions in an attempt to encourage some standardization of approaches

However, to impose sanctions, plagiarism needs to be detected It has been found that a significant share of university teachers do not use detection methods such as using text-matching software A few more try to detect plagiarism by reading term-papers specifically for plagiarism, while the latter method might be not very effective in detecting plagiarism – especially when plagiarism from unfamiliar sources needs to be detected

Plagiarism education

Given the serious consequences that plagiarism has for students, there has been a call for a greater emphasis on learning in order to help students avoid committing plagiarism This is especially important when students move to a new institution that may have a different view of the concept when compared with the view previously developed by the student Indeed, given the seriousness of plagiarism accusations for a student's future, the pedagogy of plagiarism education may need to be considered ahead of the pedagogy of the discipline being studied The need for plagiarism education extends to academic staff, who may not completely understand what is expected of their students or the consequences of misconduct

Factors influencing student´s decision to plagiarize

Several studies investigated factors that influence the decision to plagiarize For example, a panel study with students from German universities found that academic procrastination predicts the frequency plagiarism conducted within six months followed the measurement of academic procrastination It has been argued that by plagiarizing students cope with the negative consequences that result from academic procrastination such as poor grades Another study found that plagiarism is more frequent if students perceive plagiarism as beneficial and if they have the opportunity to plagiarize When students had expected higher sanctions and when they had internalized social norms that define plagiarism as very objectionable, plagiarism was less likely to occur


Since journalism relies on the public trust, a reporter's failure to honestly acknowledge their sources undercuts a newspaper or television news show's integrity and undermines its credibility Journalists accused of plagiarism are often suspended from their reporting tasks while the charges are being investigated by the news organization


See also: Duplicate publication

The reuse of significant, identical, or nearly identical portions of one's own work without acknowledging that one is doing so or citing the original work is sometimes described as "self-plagiarism"; the term "recycling fraud" has been used Articles of this nature are often referred to as duplicate or multiple publication In addition there can be a copyright issue if copyright of the prior work has been transferred to another entity Typically, self-plagiarism is only considered a serious ethical issue in settings where someone asserts that a publication consists of new material, such as in publishing or factual documentation It does not apply to public-interest texts, such as social, professional, and cultural opinions usually published in newspapers and magazines

In academic fields, self-plagiarism occurs when an author reuses portions of his own published and copyrighted work in subsequent publications, but without attributing the previous publication Identifying self-plagiarism is often difficult because limited reuse of material is accepted both legally as fair use and ethically

The concept

The term "self-plagiarism" has been challenged as being self-contradictory, an oxymoron, and on other grounds

For example, Stephanie J Bird argues that self-plagiarism is a misnomer, since by definition plagiarism concerns the use of others' material

However, the phrase is used to refer to specific forms of putatively unethical publication Bird identifies the ethical issues of "self-plagiarism" as those of "dual or redundant publication" She also notes that in an educational context, "self-plagiarism" refers to the case of a student who resubmits "the same essay for credit in two different courses" As David B Resnik clarifies, "Self-plagiarism involves dishonesty but not intellectual theft"

According to Patrick M Scanlon

"Self-plagiarism" is a term with some specialized currency Most prominently, it is used in discussions of research and publishing integrity in biomedicine, where heavy publish-or-perish demands have led to a rash of duplicate and "salami-slicing" publication, the reporting of a single study's results in "least publishable units" within multiple articles Blancett, Flanagin, & Young, 1995; Jefferson, 1998; Kassirer & Angell, 1995; Lowe, 2003; McCarthy, 1993; Schein & Paladugu, 2001; Wheeler, 1989 Roig 2002 offers a useful classification system including four types of self-plagiarism: duplicate publication of an article in more than one journal; partitioning of one study into multiple publications, often called salami-slicing; text recycling; and copyright infringement

Codes of ethics

Some academic journals have codes of ethics that specifically refer to self-plagiarism For example, the Journal of International Business Studies Some professional organizations like the Association for Computing Machinery ACM have created policies that deal specifically with self-plagiarism Other organizations do not make specific reference to self-plagiarism such as the American Political Science Association APSA The organization published a code of ethics that describes plagiarism as "deliberate appropriation of the works of others represented as one's own" It does not make any reference to self-plagiarism It does say that when a thesis or dissertation is published "in whole or in part", the author is "not ordinarily under an ethical obligation to acknowledge its origins" The American Society for Public Administration ASPA also published a code of ethics that says its members are committed to: "Ensure that others receive credit for their work and contributions," but it makes no reference to self-plagiarism

Factors that justify reuse

Pamela Samuelson, in 1994, identified several factors she says excuse reuse of one's previously published work, that make it not self-plagiarism She relates each of these factors specifically to the ethical issue of self-plagiarism, as distinct from the legal issue of fair use of copyright, which she deals with separately Among other factors that may excuse reuse of previously published material Samuelson lists the following:

  1. The previous work must be restated to lay the groundwork for a new contribution in the second work
  2. Portions of the previous work must be repeated to deal with new evidence or arguments
  3. The audience for each work is so different that publishing the same work in different places is necessary to get the message out
  4. The author thinks they said it so well the first time that it makes no sense to say it differently a second time

Samuelson states she has relied on the "different audience" rationale when attempting to bridge interdisciplinary communities She refers to writing for different legal and technical communities, saying: "there are often paragraphs or sequences of paragraphs that can be bodily lifted from one article to the other And, in truth, I lift them" She refers to her own practice of converting "a technical article into a law review article with relatively few changes—adding footnotes and one substantive section" for a different audience

Samuelson describes misrepresentation as the basis of self-plagiarism She also states "Although it seems not to have been raised in any of the self-plagiarism cases, copyrights law's fair use defense would likely provide a shield against many potential publisher claims of copyright infringement against authors who reused portions of their previous works"

Organizational publications

Plagiarism is presumably not an issue when organizations issue collective unsigned works since they do not assign credit for originality to particular people For example, the American Historical Association's "Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct" 2005 regarding textbooks and reference books states that, since textbooks and encyclopedias are summaries of other scholars' work, they are not bound by the same exacting standards of attribution as original research and may be allowed a greater "extent of dependence" on other works However, even such a book does not make use of words, phrases, or paragraphs from another text or follow too closely the other text's arrangement and organization, and the authors of such texts are also expected to "acknowledge the sources of recent or distinctive findings and interpretations, those not yet a part of the common understanding of the profession"

In the arts

LHOOQ 1919, one of Marcel Duchamp's readymades

The history of the arts

Through all of the history of literature and of the arts in general, works of art are for a large part repetitions of the tradition; to the entire history of artistic creativity belong plagiarism, literary theft, appropriation, incorporation, retelling, rewriting, recapitulation, revision, reprise, thematic variation, ironic retake, parody, imitation, stylistic theft, pastiches, collages, and deliberate assemblages There is no rigorous and precise distinction between practices like imitation, stylistic plagiarism, copy, replica and forgery These appropriation procedures are the main axis of a literate culture, in which the tradition of the canonic past is being constantly rewritten

Ruth Graham quotes TS Eliot—"Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal Bad poets deface what they take"—she notes that despite the "taboo" of plagiarism, the ill-will and embarrassment it causes in the modern context, readers seem to often forgive the past excesses of historic literary offenders

Praisings of artistic plagiarism

A passage of Laurence Sterne's 1767 Tristram Shandy, condemns plagiarism by resorting to plagiarism Oliver Goldsmith commented:

Sterne's Writings, in which it is clearly shewn, that he, whose manner and style were so long thought original, was, in fact, the most unhesitating plagiarist who ever cribbed from his predecessors in order to garnish his own pages It must be owned, at the same time, that Sterne selects the materials of his mosaic work with so much art, places them so well, and polishes them so highly, that in most cases we are disposed to pardon the want of originality, in consideration of the exquisite talent with which the borrowed materials are wrought up into the new form

In other contexts

On the Internet

Free online tools are becoming available to help identify plagiarism, and there are a range of approaches that attempt to limit online copying, such as disabling right clicking and placing warning banners regarding copyrights on web pages Instances of plagiarism that involve copyright violation may be addressed by the rightful content owners sending a DMCA removal notice to the offending site-owner, or to the ISP that is hosting the offending site The term "content scraping" has arisen to describe the copying and pasting of information from websites and blogs

See also

  • Abuse of information
  • Academic dishonesty
  • Appropriation art
  • Article spinning
  • Assemblage
  • Contract cheating
  • Copyright
  • Copyright infringement
  • Credit creative arts
  • Cryptomnesia
  • Détournement
  • Document theft
  • Essay mill
  • Fair use
  • Ghostwriter
  • Homage
  • Joke thievery
  • Journalism scandals plagiarism, fabrication, omission
  • Multiple publication
  • Musical plagiarism
  • Parody
  • Pastiche
  • Personal boundaries
  • Peer review § Plagiarism
  • Plagiarism detection
  • Scientific misconduct
    • Scientific plagiarism in India
    • Scientific plagiarism in the United States
  • Source criticism
  • Swipe comics
  • An Uncommon Story, literary memoir by Ivan Goncharov
  • The Anxiety of Influence, a 1973 book by Harold Bloom


  1. ^ From the 1995 Random House Compact Unabridged Dictionary:

    use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work

    qtd in Stepchyshyn, Vera; Nelson, Robert S 2007 Library plagiarism policies Assoc of College & Resrch Libraries p 65 ISBN 0-8389-8416-9 
  2. ^ From the Oxford English Dictionary:

    the wrongful appropriation or purloining and publication as one's own, of the ideas, or the expression of the ideas… of another

    qtd in Lands 1999
  3. ^ a b c u quotation: p40 "The boundaries between permissible and impermissible, imitation, stylistic plagiarism, copy, replica and forgery remain nebulous"
  4. ^ a b Haywood 1987 p109, quoting Arnau
  5. ^ a b Eco 1987 p202, quoting Arnau
  6. ^ O'Connor, Z 2015 Extreme plagiarism: The rise of the e-Idiot, International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 20 1, pp1-11 ISSN 2327-7955
  7. ^ a b Lynch 2002
  8. ^ a b c Green, Stuart P 2002 "Plagiarism, Norms, and the Limits of Theft Law: Some Observations on the Use of Criminal Sanctions in Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights" Hastings Law Journal 54 1 SSRN 315562 
  9. ^ Valpy, Francis Edward Jackson 2005 Etymological Dictionary of the Latin Language, p345 entry for plagium, quotation: "the crime of kidnapping"
  10. ^ "Online Etymology Dictionary" Retrieved April 24, 2011 
  11. ^ a b Newton, Philip M; Lang, Christopher 1 January 2016 Bretag, Tracey, ed Handbook of Academic Integrity Springer Singapore pp 249–271 doi:101007/978-981-287-098-8_38 – via linkspringercom 
  12. ^ a b Lands, Robert 1999 Plagiarism is no Crime published by The Association of Illustrators AOI, December 1999 Quotation:

    Plagiarism may be a taboo in academia, but in art is almost essential

  13. ^ Gabriel, Trip 1 August 2010 "Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age" The New York Times 
  14. ^ Grove, Jack 7 August 2014 "Sinister buttocks Roget would blush at the crafty cheek Middlesex lecturer gets to the bottom of meaningless phrases found while marking essays" Times Higher Education Retrieved 15 July 2015 
  15. ^ Susan D Blum, My Word!: Plagiarism and College Culture 2010
  16. ^ Cully, P Plagiarism avoidance in academic submissions Dublin Institute of Technology, 2013 Full PDF available for download at: http://arrowditie/bescharcoth/4/
  17. ^ Kock, N July 1999 "A case of academic plagiarism" Communications of the ACM 42 7: 96–104 doi:101145/306549306594 
  18. ^ Kock, N, Davison, R December 2003 "Dealing with plagiarism in the information systems research community: a look at factors that drive plagiarism and ways to address them" MIS Quarterly, 27 4: 511–32
  19. ^ Clarke, Roger 2006 "Plagiarism by academics: More complex than it seems" Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7 1: 91–121 ISSN 1536-9323 
  20. ^ "plagiarism Archives – Retraction Watch" 
  21. ^ a b Gipp, Bela 2014 Citation-based Plagiarism Detection: Detecting Disguised and Cross-language Plagiarism using Citation Pattern Analysis Springer Vieweg ISBN 978-3-658-06393-1  p10
  22. ^ a b Fishman, Teddi Sep 28–30, 2009 "We know it when we see it is not good enough: toward a standard definition of plagiarism that transcends theft, fraud, and copyright" PDF Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity  p5
  23. ^ "What is Plagiarism" Stanford University 2012-07-27
  24. ^ "What is Plagiarism" Yale College 2012-07-27
  25. ^ "Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices" Princeton University 2012-07-27
  26. ^ "Student Honor Code" Emory: Oxford College 2012-07-27
  27. ^ "What is plagiarism" Brown University Library 2012-07-27
  28. ^ The Reality and Solution of College Plagiarism University of Illinois at Chicago
  29. ^ Newton, Philip 2 April 2016 "Academic integrity: a quantitative study of confidence and understanding in students at the start of their higher education" 41 3: 482–497 doi:101080/0260293820151024199 – via Taylor and Francis+NEJM 
  30. ^ Zinie Chen Sampson August 11, 2008 "Students expelled from UVa shipboard program for plagiarism" HamptonRoadscom Retrieved December 13, 2011 
  31. ^ Tennant, Peter; Rowell, Gill 2009–2010 "Benchmark Plagiarism Tariff" PDF plagiarism adviceorg iParadigms Europe Retrieved 9 August 2013 
  32. ^ a b Sattler, S, Wiegel, C, and van Veen, F 2015: “The use frequency of 10 different methods for preventing and detecting academic dishonesty and the factors influencing their use” In: Studies in Higher Education,
  33. ^ a b Ireland, Chris; Huddersfield, University of; UK; English, John; Huddersfield, University of; UK 1 October 2011 "Let Them Plagiarise: Developing Academic Writing in a Safe Environment" 1 1: 165–172 doi:1018552/joawv1i110 
  34. ^ Gill Byrne; Chris Ireland 2011 "Using Technology to Prevent Plagiarism: Skilling the Students" PDF Working Paper 
  35. ^ Serviss, Tricia 1 January 2015 Bretag, Tracey Ann, ed Handbook of Academic Integrity Springer Singapore pp 1–14 doi:101007/978-981-287-079-7_73-1#page-1 – via linkspringercom 
  36. ^ Patrzek, J; Sattler, S; van Veen, F; Grunschel, C; Fries, S 2014 "Investigating the Effect of Academic Procrastination on the Frequency and Variety of Academic Misconduct: A Panel Study" Studies in Higher Education: 1–16 doi:101080/030750792013854765 
  37. ^ Sebastian Sattler, Peter Graeff, Sebastian Willen: Explaining the Decision to Plagiarize: An Empirical Test of the Interplay Between Rationality, Norms, and Opportunity In: Deviant Behavior 34, 2013, S 444–463, doi:101080/016396252012735909
  38. ^ "Journalism" Famous Plagiaristscom / War On Plagiarismorg Archived from the original on 26 February 2007 Retrieved 9 August 2013 
  39. ^ Dellavalle, Robert P; Banks, Marcus A; Ellis, Jeffrey I September 2007 "Frequently asked questions regarding self-plagiarism: How to avoid recycling fraud" Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 57 3: 527 doi:101016/jjaad200705018 PMC 2679117 PMID 17707155 
  40. ^ Rebecca Attwood "Allow me to rephrase, and boost my tally of articles" Times Higher Education 3 July 2008
  41. ^ Hexham, Irving 2005 "The Plague of Plagiarism: Academic Plagiarism Defined" UCalgaryca 
  42. ^ a b c d e Samuelson, Pamela August 1994 "Self-plagiarism or fair use" PDF Communications of the ACM 37 8: 21–5 doi:101145/179606179731 
  43. ^ Broome, M November 2004 "Self-plagiarism: Oxymoron, fair use, or scientific misconduct" Nursing Outlook 52 6: 273–4 doi:101016/joutlook200410001 PMID 15614263 
  44. ^ Andreescu, Liviu November 2012 "Self-Plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer" Science and Engineering Ethics doi:101007/s11948-012-9416-1 
  45. ^ Bird, SJ October 2002 "Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: what is the problem Commentary on 'Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct'" Science and Engineering Ethics 8 4: 543–4 doi:101007/s11948-002-0007-4 PMID 12501723 
  46. ^ See Resnik, David B 1998 The Ethics of Science: an introduction, London: Routledge p177, notes to chapter six, note 3 Online via Google Books
  47. ^ Scanlon, PM 2007 "Song from myself: an anatomy of self-plagiarism" Plagiary 2 1: 1–11 Retrieved 2010-08-02 
  48. ^ Lorraine Eden "JIBS Code of Ethics" Journal of International Business Studies Retrieved 2010-08-02 
  49. ^ "ACM Policy and Procedures on Plagiarism" June 2010 
  50. ^ American Political Science Association 2008 "A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Science" Second Edition Section 211 ISBN 1-878147-05-6
  51. ^ American Society for Public Administration "ASPA's Code of Ethics"
  52. ^ a b "Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct" American Historical Association 2005-01-06 Retrieved 2009-04-16 
  53. ^ Eco 1990 p 95 quotation:

    Each of the types of repetition that we have examined is not limited to the mass media but belongs by right to the entire history of artistic creativity; plagiarism, quotation, parody, the ironic retake are typical of the entire artistic-literary tradition
    Much art has been and is repetitive The concept of absolute originality is a contemporary one, born with Romanticism; classical art was in vast measure serial, and the "modern" avant-garde at the beginning of this century challenged the Romantic idea of "creation from nothingness," with its techniques of collage, mustachios on the Mona Lisa, art about art, and so on

  54. ^ Alfrey 2000
  55. ^ Genette note 3 to ch 7, p 433 quotation:

    "transposition" all the other possible terms rewriting, rehandling, remake, revision, refection, recasting, etc

  56. ^ a b Steiner 1998 pp 437, 459 quotation:

    p 437 There is between 'translation proper' and 'transmutation' a vast terrain of 'partial transformation' The verbal signs in the original message or statement are modified by one of a multitude of means or by a combination of means These include paraphrase, graphic illustration, pastiche, imitation, thematic variation, parody, citation in a supporting or undermining context, false attribution accidental or deliberate, plagiarism, collage, and many others This zone of partial transformation, of derivation, of alternate restatement determines much of our sensibility and literacy It is, quite simply, the matrix of culture

    p 459 We could, in some measure, at least, come closer to a verifiable gradation of the sequence of techniques and aims, which leads from literal translation through paraphrases, mimesis, and pastiche to thematic variation I have suggested that this sequence is the main axis of a literate culture, that a culture advances, spiralwise, via translations of its own canonic past

  57. ^ Arnau quotation: p 40 "The boundaries between permissible and impermissible, imitation, stylistic plagiarism, copy, replica and forgery remain nebulous"
  58. ^ Graham, Ruth January 7, 2014 "Word Theft" Poetryfoundationorg Retrieved 2014-01-09 
  59. ^ Mark Ford Love and Theft London Review of Books Vol 26 No 23 · 2 December 2004 pages 34–35 | 4103 words
  60. ^ Oliver Goldsmith The vicar of Wakefield: a tale, Volume 5 pxviii
  61. ^ "Apple accused of copyright wrongs" CNET
  62. ^ "Copyscape Searches For Scraped Content" WebProNews Archived from the original on 2007-02-21 
  63. ^ Jones, Del August 1, 2006 "Authorship gets lost on Web" USA Today 
  64. ^ Welch, Maura May 8, 2006 "Online plagiarism strikes blog world" The Boston Globe 

Works cited

  • Alfrey, Penelope 2000 "Petrarch's Apes: Originality, Plagiarism and Copyright Principles within Visual Culture" MIT Communications Forum
  • Arnau, Frank The art of the faker
  • Derrida, Jacques, Roudinesco, Élisabeth 2004 De Quoi Demain, English translation 2004 by Jeff Fort as For what tomorrow—: a dialogue, ch4 Unforeseeable Freedom
  • Blum, Susan D My Word!: Plagiarism and College Culture 2010
  • Eco, Umberto 1987 Fakes and Forgeries in Versus, Issues 46–48, republished in 1990 in The limits of interpretation pp 174–202
  • Eco, Umberto 1990 Interpreting Serials in The limits of interpretation, pp 83–100, excerpt; link unavailable
  • Gérard Genette 1982 Palimpsests: literature in the second degree
  • Haywood, Ian 1987 Faking it
  • Hutcheon, Linda 1985 "3 The Pragmatic Range of Parody" A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms New York: Methuen ISBN 0-252-06938-2 
  • Joachimides, Christos M and Rosenthal, Norman and Anfam, David and Adams, Brooks 1993 American art in the 20th century: painting and sculpture 1913–1993
  • Lynch, Jack 2002 The Perfectly Acceptable Practice of Literary Theft: Plagiarism, Copyright, and the Eighteenth Century, in Colonial Williamsburg: The Journal of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation 24, no 4 Winter 2002–3, pp 51–54 Also available online since 2006 at Writing World
  • Paull, Harry Major 1928 Literary ethics: a study in the growth of the literary conscience Part II, chX Parody and Burlesque pp 133–40 public domain work, author died in 1934
  • Royal Shakespeare Company 2007 The RSC Shakespeare – William Shakespeare Complete Works, Introduction to the Comedy of Errors
  • Ruthven, K K 2001 Faking Literature
  • Spearing, A C 1987 Introduction section to Chaucer's The Franklin's Prologue and Tale
  • Spearing, A C 1989 Readings in medieval poetry
  • Steiner, George 1998 After Babel, ch6 Topologies of culture, 3rd revised edition

Further reading

  • von Grunebaum, G E October 1944 "The Concept of Plagiarism in Arabic Theory" Journal of Near Eastern Studies 3 4: 234–53 doi:101086/370723 JSTOR 542996 

External links

Media related to Plagiarism at Wikimedia Commons

plagiarism, plagiarism checker, plagiarism checker for students, plagiarism checker free plagiarism detection, plagiarism detector, plagiarism meaning, plagiarism software, plagiarism test,, plagiarisma

Plagiarism Information about


  • user icon

    Plagiarism beatiful post thanks!


Plagiarism viewing the topic.
Plagiarism what, Plagiarism who, Plagiarism explanation

There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video

Random Posts

Ralph Neville, 2nd Earl of Westmorland

Ralph Neville, 2nd Earl of Westmorland

Ralph Neville, 2nd Earl of Westmorland 4 April 1406 – 3 November 1484 was an English peer Content...
Mamprusi language

Mamprusi language

The Mamprusi language, Mampruli Mampelle, Ŋmampulli, is a Gur language spoken in northern Ghana by t...
Singapore Changi Airport

Singapore Changi Airport

Singapore Changi Airport IATA: SIN, ICAO: WSSS, or simply Changi Airport, is the primary civili...
Christian Siriano

Christian Siriano

Christian Siriano born November 18, 1985 is an American fashion designer and member of the Council o...