Sun . 20 Jul 2020
TR | RU | UK | KK | BE |

Otoacoustic emission

otoacoustic emission testing, otoacoustic emissions
An otoacoustic emission OAE is a sound which is generated from within the inner ear Having been predicted by Thomas Gold in 1948, its existence was first demonstrated experimentally by David Kemp in 19781 and otoacoustic emissions have since been shown to arise through a number of different cellular and mechanical causes within the inner ear23 Studies have shown that OAEs disappear after the inner ear has been damaged, so OAEs are often used in the laboratory and the clinic as a measure of inner ear health

Broadly speaking, there are two types of otoacoustic emissions: spontaneous otoacoustic emissions SOAEs, which can occur without external stimulation, and evoked otoacoustic emissions EOAEs, which require an evoking stimulus

Contents

  • 1 Mechanism of occurrence
  • 2 Types
    • 21 Spontaneous
    • 22 Evoked
  • 3 Clinical importance
  • 4 Biometric importance
  • 5 See also
  • 6 References
  • 7 Further reading

Mechanism of occurrenceedit

OAEs are considered to be related to the amplification function of the cochlea In the absence of external stimulation, the activity of the cochlear amplifier increases, leading to the production of sound Several lines of evidence suggest that, in mammals, outer hair cells are the elements that enhance cochlear sensitivity and frequency selectivity and hence act as the energy sources for amplification One theory is that they act to increase the discriminability of signal variations in continuous noise by lowering the masking effect of its cochlear amplification4

Typesedit

Spontaneousedit

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions SOAEs are sounds that are emitted from the ear without external stimulation and are measurable with sensitive microphones in the external ear canal At least one SOAE can be detected in approx 35-50% of the population The sounds are frequency-stable between 500 Hz and 4500 Hz to have unstable volumes between -30 dB SPL and +10 dB SPL The majority of the people are unaware of their SOAEs; portions of 1-9% however perceive a SOAE as an annoying tinnitus5

Evokededit

Evoked otoacoustic emissions are currently evoked using three different methodologies Stimulus Frequency OAEs SFOAEs are measured during the application of a pure-tone stimulus, and are detected by the vectorial difference between the stimulus waveform and the recorded waveform which consists of the sum of the stimulus and the OAE Transient-evoked OAEs TEOAEs or TrOAEs are evoked using a click broad frequency range or toneburst brief duration pure tone stimulus The evoked response from a click covers the frequency range up to around 4 kHz, while a toneburst will elicit a response from the region that has the same frequency as the pure tone Distortion product OAEs DPOAEs are evoked using a pair of primary tones f 1 and f 2 with particular intensity usually either 65 - 55 dBSPL or 65 for both and ratio f 1   :   f 2 :f_ The evoked responses from these stimuli occur at frequencies f d p mathematically related to the primary frequencies, with the two most prominent being f d p = 2 f 1 − f 2 =2f_-f_ the "cubic" distortion tone, most commonly used for hearing screening and f d p = f 2 − f 1 =f_-f_ the "quadratic" distortion tone, or simple difference tone67

Clinical importanceedit

Otoacoustic emissions are clinically important because they are the basis of a simple, non-invasive test for hearing defects in newborn babies and in children who are too young to cooperate in conventional hearing tests Many western countries now have national programmes for the universal hearing screening of newborn babies Periodic early childhood hearing screenings program are also utilizing OAE technology One excellent example has been demonstrated by the Early Childhood Hearing Outreach Initiative at the National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management NCHAM at Utah State University, which has helped hundreds of Early Head Start programs across the United States implement OAE screening and follow-up practices in those early childhood educational settings8910 The primary screening tool is a test for the presence of a click-evoked OAE Otoacoustic emissions also assist in differential diagnosis of cochlear and higher level hearing losses eg, auditory neuropathy

The relationships between otoacoustic emissions and tinnitus have been explored Several studies suggest that in about 6% to 12% of normal-hearing persons with tinnitus and SOAEs, the SOAEs are at least partly responsible for the tinnitus11 Studies have found that some subjects with tinnitus display oscillating or ringing EOAEs, and in these cases, it is hypothesized that the oscillating EOAEs and tinnitus are related to a common underlying pathology rather than the emissions being the source of the tinnitus11

In conjunction with audiometric testing, OAE testing can be completed to determine changes in the responses Studies have found that exposure to noise can cause a decline in OAE responses In a study, industrial workers who were exposed 845 dBA of noise were compared to workers who were exposed to 532 dBA of noise by considering hearing thresholds and OAEs before and after 5 days of work This study revealed that hearing thresholds and OAE results were significantly lower among the workers who were exposed to higher levels of noise12

It has been found that distortion product otoacoustic emissions DPOAE’s have provided the most information for detecting mild hearing loss in high frequencies when compared to transient evoked otoacoustic emissions TEOAE13 This is an indication that DPOAE’s can help with detecting an early onset of noise-induced hearing loss A study measuring audiometric thresholds and DPOAEs among individuals in the military showed that there was a decrease in DPOAEs after noise exposure, but did not show a shift in audiometric threshold This supports OAEs as predicting early signs of noise damage14

Biometric importanceedit

In 2009, Stephen Beeby of The University of Southampton led research into utilizing otoacoustic emissions for biometric identification Devices equipped with a microphone could detect these subsonic emissions and potentially identify an individual, thereby providing access to the device, without the need of a traditional password15 It is speculated, however, that colds, medication, trimming one's ear hair, or recording and playing back a signal to the microphone could subvert the identification process16

See alsoedit

  • Auditory brainstem response
  • Entoptic phenomenon
  • Maryanne Amacher, a composer who used this phenomenon in her music
  • Pure tone audiometry

Referencesedit

  1. ^ Kemp, D T 1 January 1978 "Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system" The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64 5: 1386 Bibcode:1978ASAJ641386K doi:101121/1382104 
  2. ^ Kujawa, SG; Fallon, M; Skellett, RA; Bobbin, RP August 1996 "Time-varying alterations in the f2-f1 DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation II Influence of local calcium-dependent mechanisms" Hearing research 97 1–2: 153–64 PMID 8844195 doi:101016/s0378-59559680016-5 
  3. ^ Chang, Kay W; Norton, Susan 1 September 1997 "Efferently mediated changes in the quadratic distortion product f2−f1" The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 3: 1719 Bibcode:1997ASAJ1021719C doi:101121/1420082 
  4. ^ Lilaonitkul, W; Guinan JJ, Jr March 2009 "Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking" Journal of Neurophysiology 101 3: 1394–406 PMC 2666406  PMID 19118109 doi:101152/jn909252008 
  5. ^ Penner M J 1990 "An estimate of the prevalence of tinnitus caused by spontaneous otoacoustic emissions" Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116 4: 418–423 PMID 2317322 doi:101001/archotol199001870040040010 
  6. ^ Kujawa, SG; Fallon, M; Bobbin, RP May 1995 "Time-varying alterations in the f2-f1 DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation I: Response characterization and contribution of the olivocochlear efferents" Hearing research 85 1–2: 142–54 PMID 7559170 doi:101016/0378-59559500041-2 
  7. ^ Bian, L; Chen, S December 2008 "Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions" The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 6: 3739–50 Bibcode:2008ASAJ1243739B PMC 2676628  PMID 19206801 doi:101121/13001706 
  8. ^ Eiserman, W, & Shisler, L 2010 Identifying Hearing Loss in Young Children: Technology Replaces the Bell Zero to Three Journal, 30, No5, 24-28
  9. ^ Eiserman W; Hartel D; Shisler L; Buhrmann J; White K; Foust T 2008 "Using otoacoustic emissions to screen for hearing loss in early childhood care settings" International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 72: 475–482 doi:101016/jijporl200712006 
  10. ^ Eiserman, W, Shisler, L, & Foust, T 2008 Hearing screening in Early Childcare Settings The ASHA Leader November 4, 2008
  11. ^ a b Norton, SJ; et al 1990, "Tinnitus and otoacoustic emissions: is there a link", Ear Hear, 11 2: 159–166, PMID 2340968, doi:101097/00003446-199004000-00011 
  12. ^ 勇, 加部; 安夫, 古賀; 勇, 幸地; 博幸, 宮内; 葵, 蓑添; 大介, 桑田; いづみ, 堤; 雅文, 中川; 茂, 田中 2015-01-01 "製造業における騒音曝露作業者の耳音響放射(oae)に関する現場調査" 産業衛生学雑誌 57 6: 306–313 doi:101539/sangyoeiseiE15002 
  13. ^ Kemp, D T 2002-10-01 "Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use" British Medical Bulletin 63 1: 223–241 ISSN 0007-1420 doi:101093/bmb/631223 
  14. ^ Marshall, Lynne; Miller, Judi A Lapsley; Heller, Laurie M; Wolgemuth, Keith S; Hughes, Linda M; Smith, Shelley D; Kopke, Richard D 2009-02-01 "Detecting incipient inner-ear damage from impulse noise with otoacoustic emissions" The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 2: 995–1013 ISSN 0001-4966 doi:101121/13050304 
  15. ^ Telegraphcouk, April 25, 2009, "Ear noise can be used as identification"
  16. ^ IEEE Spectrum Online, April 29, 2009, "Your Ear Noise as Computer Password"

Further readingedit

  • MS Robinette and TJ Glattke eds, 2007 Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications, third edition Thieme
  • GA Manley, RR Fay, and AN Popper eds, 2008 Active Processes and Otoacoustic Emissions Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 30
  • S Dhar and JW Hall, III 2011 Otoacoustic Emissions: Principles, Procedures, and Protocols Plural Publishing

otoacoustic emission equipment, otoacoustic emission machine, otoacoustic emission testing, otoacoustic emissions, otoacoustic emissions (oaes), otoacoustic emissions results, otoacoustic emissions test equipment, otoacoustic emissions test results, otoacoustic emissions video, otoacoustic emissions youtube


Otoacoustic emission Information about

Otoacoustic emission


  • user icon

    Otoacoustic emission beatiful post thanks!

    29.10.2014


Otoacoustic emission
Otoacoustic emission
Otoacoustic emission viewing the topic.
Otoacoustic emission what, Otoacoustic emission who, Otoacoustic emission explanation

There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video

Random Posts

The San Francisco Examiner

The San Francisco Examiner

The San Francisco Examiner is a longtime daily newspaper distributed in and around San Francisco, Ca...
Frederator Films

Frederator Films

Frederator Films is an animation studio founded by Fred Seibert as part of Frederator Studios, with ...
John Hasbrouck Van Vleck

John Hasbrouck Van Vleck

John Hasbrouck Van Vleck March 13, 1899 – October 27, 1980 was an American physicist and mathematici...
Christian Lacroix

Christian Lacroix

Christian Marie Marc Lacroix French pronunciation: ​kʁistjɑ̃ lakʁwa; born 16 May 1951 is a Fren...