Fri . 20 Jan 2020
TR | RU | UK | KK | BE |

Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant

kashiwazaki-kariwa nuclear power plant
The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant 柏崎刈羽原子力発電所, Kashiwazaki-Kariwa genshiryoku-hatsudensho, Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP is a large, modern housing the world's first ABWR nuclear power plant on a 42-square-kilometer 1,038 acres site1 including land in the towns of Kashiwazaki and Kariwa in Niigata Prefecture, Japan on the coast of the Sea of Japan, from where it gets cooling water The plant is owned and operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company TEPCO

It was the largest nuclear generating station in the world by net electrical power rating

It was approximately 19 km 12 mi from the epicenter of the second strongest earthquake to ever occur at a nuclear plant, the Mw 66 July 2007 Chūetsu offshore earthquake This shook the plant beyond design basis and initiated an extended shutdown for inspection, which indicated that greater earthquake-proofing was needed before operation could be resumed The plant was completely shut down for 21 months following the earthquake Unit 7 was restarted after seismic upgrades on May 9, 2009, followed later by units 1, 5, and 6 Units 2, 3, 4 were not restarted

After the March 11, 2011 earthquake, all restarted units were shut down and safety improvements are being carried out As of December 2016update no units have been restarted and are not expected to restart sooner than in 201723


  • 1 Reactors
    • 11 Performance
      • 111 2002 shut downs
      • 112 1998 shut down
      • 113 1997 minor problems
      • 114 1991 shut down
    • 12 Fuel
  • 2 Earthquakes
    • 21 Earthquake resistant design features
    • 22 2004 Chūetsu earthquake
    • 23 2007 Chūetsu offshore earthquake
      • 231 IAEA inspections
      • 232 Radioactivity releases
      • 233 Other problems
      • 234 Impact
      • 235 Restart
    • 24 2011 Tōhoku earthquake
    • 25 Facility improvements after Fukushima I nuclear accidents
    • 26 2011–2012: survey on tsunamis in the past
  • 3 Events
  • 4 See also
  • 5 References
  • 6 External links


There are seven units, which are all lined up along the coast line Numbering starts at Unit 1 with the south-most unit through Unit 4, then there is a large green space in between Unit 4 and 7, then it continues with Units 6 and 5, the newest of the reactors4

The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant, a nuclear plant with seven units, the largest single nuclear power station in the world, was completely shut down for 21 months following an earthquake in 20075 Reactor attributes
KK – 1 KK – 2 KK – 3 KK – 4 KK – 5 KK – 6 KK – 7
Net Power MW 1,067 1,067 1,067 1,067 1,067 1,315 1,315
Gross Power MW 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,356 1,356
Start of Construction 6/5/1980 11/18/1985 3/7/1989 3/5/1990 6/20/1985 11/3/1992 7/1/1993
First Criticality 12/12/1984 11/30/1989 10/19/1992 11/01/1993 7/20/1989 12/18/1995 11/01/1996
Commission date 9/18/1985 9/28/1990 8/11/1993 8/11/1994 4/10/1990 11/7/1996 7/2/1997
Installation Costs
1,000 yen/kW
330 360 310 310 420 310 2806
Reactor/NSSS Supplier Toshiba Toshiba Toshiba Hitachi Hitachi Hitachi/

The power installation costs for units at this site well reflect the general trend in costs of nuclear plants Capital costs increased through the 1980s but have become cheaper in modern times The last two units were the first Advanced Boiling Water Reactors ABWRs ever built


Such a large plant size has several economic advantages, one of these being the limited impact of refueling outages of individual units on the plant's total net power production A smooth transition was seen in the power production history of the plant up through the time the last two units were built Unfortunately, since completion of construction, the plant has seen two events that caused the entire plant to be shut down

Generation for the KK NPP by Unit and total in TWh This graph show frequent changes in performance year to year due to routine outages, but for the entire plant remained almost continuous until the plant-wide events of the 2000s

2002 shut downsedit

The reactors at the KK plant were shut down one by one after the discovery of deliberate falsification of data The first one was taken offline September 9, 2002, and the last one was taken offline January 27, 20037 The newest units, the more inherently safe ABWRs, were taken back online the quickest and suffered the smallest effect Units  1, 2, and 3 on the other hand, generated no electricity during the fiscal year of 2003

1998 shut downedit

In January 1998, unit 1 was shut down after increasing radiation levels in the steam driving the turbine triggered alarms The levels were reportedly 270 times the expected operating level8

1997 minor problemsedit

On 18 July 1997, radioactive steam leaked from a gauge within unit 7 of the Kashiwazaki kariwa plant In May a burst tube had delayed trial runs at the plant, and earlier in July smoke had been found coming from plant machinery9

1991 shut downedit

In February 1991, unit 2 was automatically shut down following a sudden drop in oil pressure inside the steam turbine10


All reactors continue to use low-enriched uranium as the nuclear fuel; however, there have been plans drafted by TEPCO to use MOX fuel in some of the reactors by the permission of the Japanese Atomic Energy Commission JAEC A public referendum in the Kariwa village in 2001 voted 53% against use of the new fuel After the 2002 TEPCO data fabrication scandals, the president at the time, Nobuya Minami, announced that plans to use the MOX fuel at the KK plant would be suspended indefinitely


See also: Nuclear power in Japan § Seismicity

Earthquake resistant design featuresedit

Sand at the sites was removed and the reactor was built on firm ground Adjacent soil was backfilled Basements of the reactor buildings extend several levels down maximum of 42 m below grade11 These underground elements stabilize the reactor buildings, making them less likely to suffer sway due to resonance vibrations during an earthquake As with other Japanese power plants, reactors at the plant were built according to earthquake-resistance standards, which are regulated by law and the JAEC

In 2006 safety standards for earthquake resistance in Japan's nuclear plants were modified and tightened After the 2007 earthquake suspicions arose that another fault line may be closer to the plant than originally thought, possibly running straight through the site

2004 Chūetsu earthquakeedit

In the 2004 Chūetsu earthquake on November 4, 2004, devices around the base of the plant only measured 4 on the Japanese seismological intensity scale while other nearby places measured 6

All of the reactors except for Unit 4 were operating normally at the time of the earthquake and continued to do so through the quake, Unit 4 was shut down due to routine maintenance Unit 7 shut down during an aftershock because the turbine thrust bearing wear trip signal was activated

2007 Chūetsu offshore earthquakeedit

The nearby offshore fault lines to the plant Some faults were discovered through research after the major earthquake while some were known before

The KK plant was 19 kilometers away from the epicenter of the magnitude 66 2007 Chūetsu offshore earthquake, which took place 10:13 am, July 16, 2007 Shaking of 68 m/s² 069 g was recorded in Unit 1 in the east-west direction, above the design specification for safe shutdown of 45 m/s², and well above the rapid restart specification for key equipment in the plant of 273 m/s²12 Units 5 and 6 also recorded shaking over this limit13 Shaking of 2058 m/s² was recorded in the turbine building of Unit 314

Those nearby saw black smoke which was later confirmed to be an electric transformer that had caught fire at Unit 31516 The fire was put out by noon on the day of the quake, about 2 hours after it started The 3-story transformer building was extensively charred17

Reactor units 3, 4, and 7 all automatically powered down safely in response to the quake Unit 2 was in startup mode and not online11 Units 1, 5, and 6 were already shut down for inspection at the time TEPCO was ready to restart some of the units as of the next day, but the trade ministry ordered the plant to remain idle until additional safety checks could be completed On Wednesday, July 18, the mayor of Kashiwazaki ordered operations at the plant to be halted until its safety could be confirmed18 The Nikkei reported that government safety checks could delay the restart for over a year, without stating the source of the information19 For comparison, in 2005, a reactor at the Onagawa NPP was closed for five months following an earthquake19

IAEA inspectionsedit

The International Atomic Energy Agency offered to inspect the plant, which was initially declined The governor of Niigata prefecture then sent a petition to Shinzo Abe On Sunday, July 22, 2007, the NISA announced that it would allow inspectors from the United Nations to review the damage20

A team from the IAEA carried out a four-day inspection, as investigations by Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency NISA, Nuclear Safety Commission NSC and the Tokyo Electric Power Company TEPCO continued21 The team of the IAEA confirmed that the plant had "shut down safely" and that "damage appears less than expected"22 On August 19, the IAEA reported that, for safety-related and nuclear components, "no visible significant damage has been found" although "nonsafety related structures, systems and components were affected by significant damage"23

The official report issued by the IAEA stated that the plant "behaved in a safe manner" after a 4-day inspection Other observations were:

  • "Safety related structures, systems and components of the plant seem to be in a general condition, much better than might be expected for such a strong earthquake, and there is no visible significant damage"
  • Conservatisms introduced in the construction of the plant compensated for the magnitude of the earthquake being so much greater than planned for

Recommendations included:

  • A re-evaluation of the seismic safety
  • Detailed geophysical investigations24

External inspections of the plant were planned to be completed by the end of July 2008 The schedule was confirmed on 10 July 2008 by the site superintendent, Akio Takahashi On July 15, Akira Amari said his ministry was also continuing their own tests An IAEA workshop in June 2008 recognized that the earthquake exceeded the "seismic input" used in the design in that plant, and that regulations played a critical role in keeping the plant safe25 However, TEPCO determined that significant upgrades were required to cope with the improved understanding of the seismic environment and possible shaking effects at the plant site

The IAEA sent a team for a follow-up visit in January 2008 They concluded that much high-quality inspection work had been undertaken and noted the likely improvements to nuclear seismic design worldwide that may result from this process26 An additional visit from an IAEA team of 10 experts occurred in December 2008, noting that the "unexpectedly large ground motions" were now well understood and could be protected against, and further confirming the safe performance of the plant during the quake2728

Radioactivity releasesedit

Initially, it was thought that some water estimated to be about 15 L from the spent fuel pool leaked into the Sea of Japan as a result of the quake2930 Later, more detailed reports confirmed a number of releases, though most of them were far less active than common natural radiation sources According to the NISA, this was the first time a release of radioactive material happened as a result of an earthquake

  • 06 litres of slightly radioactive water leaked from the third floor of the Unit 6 reactor building, which contained 280 becquerels of radioactivity For reference, a household smoke detector typically contains 37,000 becquerels 10 µCi of radioactivity,31 and a living adult human typically has around 8000 Bq of naturally occurring radioactivity inside his or her body
  • 09 litres of slightly radioactive water leaked from the inner third floor of the Unit 6 reactor building, containing 16,000 Bq of radioactivity
  • From unit 6, 13 cubic meters of water from the spent fuel pool leaked from the pool, and flowed into through a drainage pipe, ultimately into the Sea of Japan The water contained 80 Bq/L, totaling 90,000 Bq in the release32 For comparison, an Onsen located in Misasa, Tottori, Japan uses water with a large concentration of radon, which gives it a radioactivity of 9300 Bq/L The leaked water from the plant did not pose a health risk even before being diluted Towels were used to mop up the water33
  • On Wednesday, 18 July 2007, at Unit 7, radioactive iodine was found leaking from an exhaust pipe by a government inspector, the leak began between Tuesday and Wednesday and was confirmed to have stopped by Thursday night The amount of iodine released was estimated at 12 million Bq and the total amount of particulate radioactivity released into the air was about 402,000,000 Bq34 This was said to have been one 10 millionth of the legal limit35 It is estimated that this caused an unintentional dose of 00002 nanosieverts nSv, per person distributed among around 10 million people The limit for dose to the public from the operations of a nuclear plant in Japan in one year is 1100 nSv, and, for comparison, natural background radiation worldwide for humans is on average around 2,400,000 nSv/year 24 mSv/year In regards to the cause, Yasuhisa Shiozaki said "This is an error of not implementing the manual," because the vent should have been closed36

Other problemsedit

A diagram on TEPCO's website 2 that shows the location and usually readings from the radiation detectors and an anemometer In this image, from hours after the earthquake, all detectors show an error message

About 400 drums containing low-level nuclear waste stored at the plant were knocked over by the aftershocks, 40 losing their lids37 Company officials reported on July 17 that traces of the radioactive materials cobalt-60, iodine, and chromium-51 had been released into the atmosphere, presumably from the containers losing their lids

Criticisms of the company's response to the event included the time it took the company to report events and the certainty with which they were able to locate the source of various problems TEPCO's president made a comment the site was a "mess"38 after visiting post-quake While the reported amount of leaked radioactivity remained far below what poses a danger to the public, details changed multiple times in the few days after the quake and attracted significant media attention After the quake, TEPCO was supposedly investigating 50 separate cases of "malfunctioning and trouble,"39 a number that was changed to 63 cases later40 Even the radioactivity sensors around the site encountered trouble, the reading from these devices are normally available online, giving the public a direct measure of ambient radioactivity around the site, but due to damage sustained during the earthquake, stopped reporting on the website The company published an apology on that page, and data from the devices covering the off-line period was released later, showing no artificial abnormalities note that the readings naturally fluctuate depending on whether it's raining or snowing and a host of other factors41

TEPCO's president maintained that fears of a leak of radioactive material were unfounded since the amount leaked into the ocean was a billionth of the legal limit, but many international reporters expressed distrust of the company that has a history of cover-up controversies The IAEA's Mohamed ElBaradei encouraged full transparency throughout the investigation of the accident so that lessons learned could be applied to nuclear plants elsewhere38


News of the earthquake, combined with the fact that replacement power sources such as oil and gas are at record highs, caused TEPCOs stock to plummet 75%, the largest drop in seven years, which amounted to around 44 billion USD lost in stock capitalization42 This made the event even more costly to the company than the 2002 data falsification scandal Additionally, TEPCO warned that the plant closure could cause a power shortage during the summer months39 Trade minister Akira Amari requested that business users cut electricity use,43 and in August TEPCO was forced to reduce electricity supplies for industrial uses, the first time it had to resort to such measures in 17 years44

Reports of the leak caused thousands of cancellations at resorts and hotels along the Sea of Japan coast, even as far as Murakami, Niigata 140 km northeast and Sado Island Inn owners have said that rumors have been more damaging than direct effects of the earthquake45

The shutdown forced TEPCO to run natural gas plants in place of this plant, not only increasing Japan's demand for the fuel and increasing the price internationally, but also increasing carbon dioxide output such that Japan will have difficulty meeting the Kyoto Protocol


After 16 months of comprehensive component-based assessment and upgrades on all seven reactors, this phase of post-earthquake response was almost complete, with reactor 7 fully upgraded to cope with the seismic environment On 8 November 2008, fuel loading in reactor unit 7 started, preparatory to a period of system safety tests on that reactor46 On 19 February 2009 TEPCO applied to the local governance to restart unit 7 after having obtained approval from the national government and regulators47 Local government agreement for restart was granted in May48 and electrical grid power was supplied from Unit 7 at 20% power on 19 May49 The reactor was raised to 100% power on 5 June 2009 as part of a series of restart tests50

Unit 6 restarted on 26 August 200951 and reconnected to the grid on 31 August52

Unit 1 restarted on 31 May 201053 after loading with fuel along with Unit 5 earlier in the year, and was generating grid power by 6 June 201054

Unit 5 recommenced grid generation on 26 November 2010, in the same week that fuel loading for unit 3 started55

2011 Tōhoku earthquakeedit

The plant was not affected by the 11 March 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami Subsequently, reactors were shut down for scheduled inspections see Events below and local governors and courts would not allow them to be restarted

Facility improvements after Fukushima I nuclear accidentsedit

After Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, TEPCO announced on 21 April 2011, the plan to build up the seawall, to a height of 15 m 492 ft above sea level, more than 800 m 2,624 ft in length for units 1- 4, and more than 500 m 1,640 ft for unit 5–7 by June 2013, which has been assumed 33 m height of tsunami Also, plans have been made to rebuild the storage pool for radioactive water overflow by September 201256

2011–2012: survey on tsunamis in the pastedit

On 10 November 2011, TEPCO announced a survey for signs of past tsunamis in this area With drills, soil samples were to be taken of sediment layers dating from the year 1600 back to 7000 years ago, at nine locations around the plant at the coast of central Japan This survey, the first that TEPCO ever conducted on this subject, did start on 15 November 2011, and was planned to be completed in April 2012, and was done to examine the possibility of higher tsunamis than had been expected at the time the plant was designed and built57

On 26 April 2012, TEPCO said that it would recalculate the risks of earthquakes and tsunamis This was done after reports, as published by four prefectures around the nuclear Plant, re-estimated the risks of potential earthquakes in the region:

  • Tottori Prefecture: a 220 kilometer long fault might trigger an 815 magnitude earthquake
  • Shimane Prefecture : 801 magnitude
  • Ishikawa Prefecture : 799 magnitude

The calculated earthquake magnitudes are almost three times stronger than all the calculations done by TEPCO regarding the safety assessments for the plant These were based on a magnitude 785 quake caused by a 131 kilometer long fault near Sado Island in Niigata and a 33 meter-high tsunami To endure this, an embankment was under construction to resist tsunami waves up to 15 meters high The recalculation could have consequences for the stress tests and safety assessments for the plant58

After the planned revision of the safety standards in July 2013, some faults under the reactors were considered as geologically active This was found by a Japanese newsagency Kyodo News on 23 January 2013 in papers and other material published by TEPCO Under the new regulations, geologic faults would be considered to be active if they had moved within the last 400 000 years, instead of the less stringent standard of 120 000 years, as was formerly accepted Two faults, named "Alpha" and "Beta," are present under Reactors 1 and 2 Other faults are situated under Reactor 3 and Reactor 5, as well as underneath the building of Reactor 4 Under the new regulations, the beta-fault could be classified as active because it moved a ground layer including volcanic ash around 240 000 years ago The final outcome of the study might trigger a second survey by the newly installed Japanese regulator NRA In January 2013, studies were conducted or planned on geological faults around six Japanese reactor sites The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant would be number 759


By Japanese law and other countries have similar reporting, utilities operating nuclear plants must report certain kinds of events power excursions, high dose to a worker, or accidents to the NISA and METI Some of the events listed below didn't necessarily fit this category but TEPCO decided to officially report them anyway

  • In May 2000, Unit 6 had to be shut down as a precautionary measure when increased concentrations of Iodine were detected in the coolant loop
  • On June 12, 2004, the vacuum in the condenser in Unit 1 began to decrease The operators reduced power, and the condenser pressure stabilized so the unit was run at the lower power of 800 MW for some time
  • On February 4, 2005, Unit 1 was manually shut down due to leakage of steam in the lower floor of the turbine room
  • On July 3, 2005, the Unit 5 reactor tripped by a turbine trip caused by a decreased vacuum in the condenser turbine trip occurs to protect the turbine
  • On May 26, 2006, TEPCO and the Chūbu Electric Power Company submitted a report about cracking in the hafnium control blades
  • On July 12, 2006, it was discovered that a worker was exposed to radiation above the 08 millisievert legal limit in one day, receiving 103 millisieverts
  • On July 16, 2007, the 2007 Chūetsu offshore earthquake caused severe damage to parts of the plant, resulting in small radioactive releases, complete shutdown and seismic upgrades
  • On September 20, 2007, a temporary air conditioner on the roof of the plant caught fire, but there was no danger of a radioactive leak6061
  • On May 22, 2008, TEPCO announced that earthquake resistance standards needed to be increased by a factor of five and work to reinforce the reactors would begin in June62
  • On August 5, 2011, in the afternoon the output of reactor 1 was reduced, and the next day the reactor would stop completely This was done for a 2-month inspection It was the first reactor run by TEPCO, to undergo an inspection since the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Another reactor at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant was scheduled for a regular inspection late August 2011 Niigata Governor Hirohiko Izumida said, that he won't give permission for any restart of a reactor, before the cause of the accident at the Fukushima plant would be revealed63
  • On 22 August 2011 reactor 7 was taken offline for regular inspections The normal time for this checkup was about 3 months64
  • On 9 September 2011 TEPCO started with stress-tests to confirm the safety of two of its idle nuclear reactors A computer-simulation was to be used to confirm the reactors' earthquake and tsunami resistance This test was introduced after the triple meltdown at the Fukushima-accident All reactors in Japan needed to pass this test after their normal regular inspections before they were allowed to resume operation The Governor of Niigata Hirohiko Izumida said that he would not take any decision about a restart before the Fukushima accident would be properly assessed65
  • On 12 July 2012, in order to block all attempts to reactivate any nuclear reactor of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant, three plaintiffs, including two nuclear crisis evacuees, demanded during the first oral proceedings of a lawsuit at the Niigata District court, that the plant should be closed for ever The lawsuit was filed by 132 people from six prefectures, among them 13 evacuees from Fukushima Prefecture TEPCO asked the court in a written reply to reject the case Tha plaintiffs agued that the disaster in Fukushima, that contaminated their hometowns, was described as "man-made" According to them, nuclear plants, which could cause unpredictable damage, should not be constructed, and "TEPCO should realize that it is going to pass this bitter legacy on to the future" They argued also, that TEPCO had neither the qualifications nor capability to operate and manage nuclear plants, and that the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant was "built in an extremely dangerous place" The lawsuit was the first that tried to shut down a nuclear reactor operated by TEPCO since the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in 201166
  • On 2 July 2013 TEPCO announced that it would ask the nuclear regulatory authority permission to restart reactors 6 and 7 after the new safety regulations would take effect on 8 July 2013 Before approval could be obtained the NRA did need to confirm that the plant satisfied the new safety regulations TEPCO would try to explain the request to the government of the Niiagata prefecture, but it could be difficult to convince governor Hirohiko Izumida By restarting the nuclear plant TEPCO hoped to cut its spending on fossil fuel67

See alsoedit

  • Japan portal
  • Energy portal
  • Nuclear technology portal
  • Katsuhiko Ishibashi
  • Pacific Ring of Fire


  1. ^ TEPCO Official Press Release Japanese First in Japan – Use of the Full Area for Power Plant Buildings, Reinforced Concrete R&D, and Waste Incinerator Building July 25, 2002
  2. ^ "Tepco may ask US utility to inspect Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant" 30 October 2014 Retrieved 7 February 2017 – via Japan Times Online 
  3. ^ Reuters: Tepco shares slump after anti-nuclear novice wins Japan election, accessdate: December 4, 2016
  4. ^ Monitoring>
  5. ^ The European Parliament's Greens-EFA Group – The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2007 Archived 2008-06-25 at the Wayback Machine p 23
  6. ^ "よくわかる原子力 – 原発の発電コスト" Retrieved 7 February 2017 
  7. ^ "Imagine a world without nuclear power – Wise International" Retrieved 7 February 2017 
  8. ^ "Kashiwazaki nuclear power plant shutdown after unusual radiation spike, Japan 1998 - on Newspaperscom" Newspaperscom Retrieved 2015-08-22 
  9. ^ "Kashiwazaki nuclear power plant malfunctions and emissions, Japan 1997 - on Newspaperscom" Newspaperscom Retrieved 2015-08-22 
  10. ^ "Nuclear woes - automatic shutdown at Kashiwazaki nuclear power plant, Japan 1991 - on Newspaperscom" Newspaperscom Retrieved 2015-08-22 
  11. ^ a b Alex K Tang, PE and Anshel J Schiff, ed 2007 Kashiwazaki, Japan Earthquake of July 16, 2007: Lifeline Performance Reston, VA: ASCE, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering ISBN 9780784410622 
  12. ^ "Profits shaken at TEPCO" World Nuclear News 31 July 2007 Retrieved 2007-08-01 
  13. ^ Asahicom Quake exposes nuke-plant danger July 18, 2007
  14. ^ "Quake-hit Japanese nuclear plant may have experienced strongest shaking on record in world" International Herald Tribune 31 July 2007 Retrieved 2007-08-01 
  15. ^ ABC News Strong Quake Rocks Northwestern Japan July 16, 2007
  16. ^ Xinhua News Two die, over 200 injured in strong quake in Japan July 16, 2007
  17. ^ Chunichi Web 柏崎刈羽原発が緊急停止 3号機外の変圧器で火災 Japanese
  18. ^ Nuclear plant hit by earthquake closed indefinitely in Japan, Associated Press in the International Herald Tribune, published 2007-07-18, accessed 2007-07-19
  19. ^ a b TEPCO shares dive on risk of lengthy shutdown, Reuters, published 2007-07-19, accessed 2007-07-19
  20. ^ Reuters Japan accepts IAEA inspectors after quake troubles July 22, 2007 accessed July 22, 2007
  21. ^ IAEA Team to Visit Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant, IAEA, published 2007-08-03, accessed 2007-08-06
  22. ^ "Kashiwazaki Kariwa visit concludes" World Nuclear News 2007-08-15 Retrieved 2007-08-15 
  23. ^ "IAEA: No significant damage at nuke plant" 19 August 2007 Retrieved 7 February 2017 – via Japan Times Online 
  24. ^ Nuclear Engineering International IAEA report on Kashiwazaki-Kariwa 31 August 2007
  25. ^ NucNet Inspections Draw To Close At Quake-Hit Japan Plant July 22, 2008
  26. ^ "Follow-up IAEA Report on Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant Published" 26 February 2008 Retrieved 7 February 2017 
  27. ^ "IAEA Fact-finding Mission to Review Safety Assessment at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant" 4 November 2008 Retrieved 7 February 2017 
  28. ^ IAEA Completes Third Mission to Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant
  29. ^ The Washington Post Earthquake Spills Water At Japanese Nuclear Plant July 17, 2007
  30. ^ BBC News Nuclear scare after Japan quake July 16, 2007
  31. ^ Howstuffworkscom How smoke detectors work
  32. ^ "柏崎刈羽原子力発電所6号機の放射性物質の漏えいについて|TEPCOニュース|東京電力" Retrieved 7 February 2017 
  33. ^ Asahi Towels used to mop up nuke spill July 26
  34. ^ 平成 19 年新潟県中越沖地震における東京電力株柏崎刈羽原子力発電所 7 号機の主排気筒からのヨウ素等の検出について 第 3 報 A press release published by Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, METI, July 20, 2007, in Japanese Archived August 10, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  35. ^ Bloomburg Tokyo Electric Shares Drop to 9-Month Low After Quake Update3 July 19
  36. ^ ABC News Another Radioactive Leak at Japan Plant July 20, 2007
  37. ^ Forbes Company: Japan Radioactive Leak Bigger July 18, 2007 accessed July 21, 2007
  38. ^ a b NDTVcom Japan: Nuke plant closed indefinitely Thursday, July 19, 2007 accessed July 21, 2007
  39. ^ a b International Herald Tribune Leak at Japan nuke plant blamed on failure to follow operating manual
  40. ^ FOXNewscom http://wwwfoxnewscom/story/0,2933,290158,00html
  41. ^ The detector data from the onset of the earthquake through the next day: 1
  42. ^ Bloomberg News Tokyo Electric Shares Drop Most in 7 Years on Quake Update1 July 19, 2007
  43. ^ The Independent Fear and fury in shadow of Japan's damaged nuclear giant July 21, 2007 accessed July 21, 2007
  44. ^ "Japan's PR aftershock" Nuclear Engineering International 14 September 2007 Retrieved 2007-10-25 
  45. ^ Yomiuri Tourism in Niigata on ropes / N-plant leaks keep droves of visitors away in summer season July 25
  46. ^ Fuel loading starts at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa reactor 11 Nov 2008
  47. ^ TEPCO to seek local govts' OK to restart nuke plant 23 Feb 2009
  48. ^ TEPCO press release on Approval of Restarting Unit No 7 8 May 2009
  49. ^ TEPCO press release on Starting generation 19 May 2009
  50. ^ TEPCO press release on 100% power levels 5 Jun 2009
  51. ^ TEPCO press release on Unit 6 restart 26 Aug 2009
  52. ^ TEPCO press release on Unit 6 at 20% power 31 Aug 2009
  53. ^ Kashiwazaki Kariwa 1 restarting, World Nuclear News, 2 June 2010
  54. ^ 10 Jun 2010 Status of restoration works, TEPCO press release
  55. ^ 2 Dec 2010 Status of restoration works, TEPCO press release
  56. ^ Yomiuri Shimbun, 21 April 2011, ver13S page 37, and 柏崎刈羽原発に防潮堤設置へ「15メートルの津波に対応」 To build seawall to withstand a 15 m tsunami in Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant Sankei Shimbun in Japanese Retrieved 2011-04-22 
  57. ^ The Mainichi Daily News 11 November 2011 TEPCO to conduct drill survey at Niigata plant for evidence of tsunami
  58. ^ The Mainichi Shimbun 27 April 2012 TEPCO to recalculate potential tsunami height near Niigata nuke plant
  59. ^ The Mainichi Shimbun 24 January 2013 Quake faults at TEPCO's Niigata nuclear power plant may be active
  60. ^ "BBC NEWS – Asia-Pacific – Fire at Japan's quake-hit plant" Retrieved 7 February 2017 
  61. ^ "TEPCO : Press Release – The Possible Cause of and Measures against the Fire on the Roof Non-Controlled Area of the Unit 1 Combination Building at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Station" Retrieved 7 February 2017 
  62. ^ "The Asahi Shimbun" Retrieved 7 February 2017 
  63. ^ JAIF 5 August 2011Nuclear reactor 1 shut down for inspection
  64. ^ Jaif 23 August 2011TEPCO plant in Niigata to close for checks
  65. ^ JAIF 9 September 2011Earthquake Report 200: TEPCO begins tress-tests
  66. ^ The Mainichi Shimbun 12 July 2012Nuke disaster evacuees ask court to force shuttering of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant
  67. ^ The Mainich Shimbun 02 July 2013 TEPCO to file for procedures to restart Niigata nuclear plant

External linksedit

Niigata Chuetsu Offshore earthquake related
  • Niigata Chuetsu Offshore Earthquake impacts — Japan Atomic Industrial Forum
  • Earthquake impacts — Japan Nuclear Technology Institute
  • View on earthquake events — Japan's Nuclear Safety Commission
    • Chairman's statement
  • Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Earthquake — Japan's Citizens' Nuclear Information Center Report
  • Kashiwazaki nuclear plant — report from the scene — Greenpeace
  • Insight: Where not to build nuclear power stations — New Scientist
  • Japan’s Quake-Prone Atomic Plant Prompts Wider Worry — The New York Times
Entire plant related
  • Tokyo Electric Company Official Site for Kashiwazaki-Kariwa 東京電力・柏崎刈羽原子力発電所 Japanese
  • Power plant on-line monitor This shows output power, click on icons at top left to see three different radiation monitors Japanese
  • Nuclear TEPCO-Power Plants English
  • List of events at the plant English

kashiwazaki-kariwa nuclear power plant

Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant Information about

Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant

  • user icon

    Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant beatiful post thanks!


Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant viewing the topic.
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant what, Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant who, Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant explanation

There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video

Random Posts



The Picts were a tribal confederation of peoples who lived in what is today eastern and northern Sco...
Visual prosthesis

Visual prosthesis

A visual prosthesis, often referred to as a bionic eye, is an experimental visual device intended to...
Mini rugby

Mini rugby

Mini rugby, also known as New Image Rugby, is a form of rugby union designed to introduce the sport ...
List of synthetic polymers

List of synthetic polymers

Synthetic polymers are human-made polymers From the utility point of view they can be classified int...