Tue . 20 Jul 2020
TR | RU | UK | KK | BE |

Fractional factorial design

fractional factorial design, fractional factorial design of experiments
In statistics, fractional factorial designs are experimental designs consisting of a carefully chosen subset fraction of the experimental runs of a full factorial design The subset is chosen so as to exploit the sparsity-of-effects principle to expose information about the most important features of the problem studied, while using a fraction of the effort of a full factorial design in terms of experimental runs and resources


  • 1 Notation
  • 2 Generation
  • 3 Resolution
  • 4 Example fractional factorial experiment
  • 5 External links
  • 6 See also
  • 7 References


Fractional designs are expressed using the notation lk − p, where l is the number of levels of each factor investigated, k is the number of factors investigated, and p describes the size of the fraction of the full factorial used Formally, p is the number of generators, assignments as to which effects or interactions are confounded, ie, cannot be estimated independently of each other see below A design with p such generators is a 1/lp fraction of the full factorial design

For example, a 25 − 2 design is 1/4 of a two level, five factor factorial design Rather than the 32 runs that would be required for the full 25 factorial experiment, this experiment requires only eight runs

In practice, one rarely encounters l > 2 levels in fractional factorial designs, since response surface methodology is a much more experimentally efficient way to determine the relationship between the experimental response and factors at multiple levels In addition, the methodology to generate such designs for more than two levels is much more cumbersome

The levels of a factor are commonly coded as +1 for the higher level, and −1 for the lower level For a three-level factor, the intermediate value is coded as 0

To save space, the points in a two-level factorial experiment are often abbreviated with strings of plus and minus signs The strings have as many symbols as factors, and their values dictate the level of each factor: conventionally, − for the first or low level, and + for the second or high level The points in this experiment can thus be represented as − − , + − , − + , and + +

The factorial points can also be abbreviated by 1, a, b, and ab, where the presence of a letter indicates that the specified factor is at its high or second level and the absence of a letter indicates that the specified factor is at its low or first level for example, "a" indicates that factor A is on its high setting, while all other factors are at their low or first setting 1 is used to indicate that all factors are at their lowest or first values


In practice, experimenters typically rely on statistical reference books to supply the "standard" fractional factorial designs, consisting of the principal fraction The principal fraction is the set of treatment combinations for which the generators evaluate to + under the treatment combination algebra However, in some situations, experimenters may take it upon themselves to generate their own fractional design

A fractional factorial experiment is generated from a full factorial experiment by choosing an alias structure The alias structure determines which effects are confounded with each other For example, the five factor 25 − 2 can be generated by using a full three factor factorial experiment involving three factors say A, B, and C and then choosing to confound the two remaining factors D and E with interactions generated by D = AB and E = AC These two expressions are called the generators of the design So for example, when the experiment is run and the experimenter estimates the effects for factor D, what is really being estimated is a combination of the main effect of D and the two-factor interaction involving A and B

An important characteristic of a fractional design is the defining relation, which gives the set of interaction columns equal in the design matrix to a column of plus signs, denoted by I For the above example, since D = AB and E = AC, then ABD and ACE are both columns of plus signs, and consequently so is BDCE In this case the defining relation of the fractional design is I = ABD = ACE = BCDE The defining relation allows the alias pattern of the design to be determined

Treatment combinations for a 25 − 2 design
Treatment combination I A B C D = AB E = AC
de + + +
a + +
be + + +
abd + + + +
cd + + +
ace + + + +
bc + + +
abcde + + + + + +


An important property of a fractional design is its resolution or ability to separate main effects and low-order interactions from one another Formally, the resolution of the design is the minimum word length in the defining relation excluding 1 The most important fractional designs are those of resolution III, IV, and V: Resolutions below III are not useful and resolutions above V are wasteful in that the expanded experimentation has no practical benefit in most cases—the bulk of the additional effort goes into the estimation of very high-order interactions which rarely occur in practice The 25 − 2 design above is resolution III since its defining relation is I = ABD = ACE = BCDE

Resolution Ability Example
I Not useful: an experiment of exactly one run only tests one level of a factor and hence can't even distinguish between the high and low levels of that factor 21 − 1 with defining relation I = A
II Not useful: main effects are confounded with other main effects 22 − 1 with defining relation I = AB
III Estimate main effects, but these may be confounded with two-factor interactions 23 − 1 with defining relation I = ABC

Estimate main effects unconfounded by two-factor interactions
Estimate two-factor interaction effects, but these may be confounded with other two-factor interactions

24 − 1 with defining relation I = ABCD

Estimate main effects unconfounded by three-factor or less interactions
Estimate two-factor interaction effects unconfounded by two-factor interactions
Estimate three-factor interaction effects, but these may be confounded with other two-factor interactions

25 − 1 with defining relation I = ABCDE

Estimate main effects unconfounded by four-factor or less interactions
Estimate two-factor interaction effects unconfounded by three-factor or less interactions
Estimate three-factor interaction effects, but these may be confounded with other three-factor interactions

26 − 1 with defining relation I = ABCDEF

The resolution described is only used for regular designs Regular designs have run size that equal a power of two, and only full aliasing is present Nonregular designs are designs where run size is a multiple of 4; these designs introduce partial aliasing, and generalized resolution is used as design criterion instead of the resolution described previously

Example fractional factorial experiment

Montgomery gives the following example of a fractional factorial experiment An engineer performed an experiment to increase the filtration rate output of a process to produce a chemical, and to reduce the amount of formaldehyde used in the process The full factorial experiment is described in the Wikipedia page Factorial experiment Four factors were considered: temperature A, pressure B, formaldehyde concentration C, and stirring rate D The results in that example were that the main effects A, C, and D and the AC and AD interactions were significant The results of that example may be used to simulate a fractional factorial experiment using a half-fraction of the original 24 = 16 run design The table shows the 24-1 = 8 run half-fraction experiment design and the resulting filtration rate, extracted from the table for the full 16 run factorial experiment

In this fractional design, each main effect is aliased with a 3-factor interaction eg, A = BCD, and every 2-factor interaction is aliased with another 2-factor interaction eg, AB = CD The aliasing relationships are shown in the table This is a resolution IV design, meaning that main effects are aliased with 3-way interactions, and 2-way interactions are aliased with 2-way interactions

The analysis of variance estimates of the effects are shown in the table below From inspection of the table, there appear to be large effects due to A, C, and D The coefficient for the AB interaction is quite small Unless the AB and CD interactions have approximately equal but opposite effects, these two interactions appear to be negligible If A, C, and D have large effects, but B has little effect, then the AC and AD interactions are most likely significant These conclusions are consistent with the results of the full-factorial 16-run experiment

Because B and its interactions appear to be insignificant, B may be dropped from the model Dropping B results in a full factorial 23 design for the factors A, C, and D Performing the anova using factors A, C, and D, and the interaction terms A:C and A:D, gives the results shown in the table, which are very similar to the results for the full factorial experiment experiment, but have the advantage of requiring only a half-fraction 8 runs rather than 16

External links

  • Full Factorial and Fractional Factorial Experiments: Frequently Asked Questions The Methodology Center, Penn State University
  • Fractional Factorial Designs National Institute of Standards and Technology

See also

  • Robust parameter designs


  1. ^ Box, GE; Hunter, JS; Hunter,WG 2005 Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery, 2nd Edition Wiley ISBN 0-471-71813-0 
  2. ^ Montgomery, Douglas C 2013, Design and Analysis of Experiments 8th ed, Wiley 

fractional factorial design, fractional factorial design alias, fractional factorial design complete presentation, fractional factorial design example, fractional factorial design generator, fractional factorial design of experiments, fractional factorial design presentation online on youtube, fractional factorial design resolution, fractional factorial design table, fractional factorial design tutorial

Fractional factorial design Information about

Fractional factorial design

  • user icon

    Fractional factorial design beatiful post thanks!


Fractional factorial design
Fractional factorial design
Fractional factorial design viewing the topic.
Fractional factorial design what, Fractional factorial design who, Fractional factorial design explanation

There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video

Random Posts

The San Francisco Examiner

The San Francisco Examiner

The San Francisco Examiner is a longtime daily newspaper distributed in and around San Francisco, Ca...
Frederator Films

Frederator Films

Frederator Films is an animation studio founded by Fred Seibert as part of Frederator Studios, with ...
John Hasbrouck Van Vleck

John Hasbrouck Van Vleck

John Hasbrouck Van Vleck March 13, 1899 – October 27, 1980 was an American physicist and mathematici...
Christian Lacroix

Christian Lacroix

Christian Marie Marc Lacroix French pronunciation: ​kʁistjɑ̃ lakʁwa; born 16 May 1951 is a Fren...