Sun . 19 Sep 2019
TR | RU | UK | KK | BE |

Criticism of Google

criticism of google, analysis of google
Criticism of Google includes aggressive and contrived tax avoidance, alleged misuse and manipulation of search results, its use of others' intellectual property, concerns that its compilation of data may violate people's privacy, censorship of search results and content, and the energy consumption of its servers as well as concerns over traditional business issues such as monopoly, restraint of trade, antitrust, and idea borrowing

Alphabet Inc is an American multinational public corporation invested in Internet search, cloud computing, and advertising technologies Google hosts and develops a number of Internet-based services and products, and generates profit primarily from advertising through its AdWords program

Google's stated mission is "to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful"; this mission, and the means used to accomplish it, have raised concerns among the company's critics Much of the criticism pertains to issues that have not yet been addressed by cyber law


  • 1 Aggressive tax avoidance
  • 2 Antitrust
    • 21 European Union
    • 22 US antitrust issues
    • 23 Russia antitrust case
  • 3 Possible misuse of search results
    • 31 The Aliyun OS affair
  • 4 Page Rank
    • 41 Danger of ranging manipulation
  • 5 Google Shopping rankings
  • 6 Copyright issues
    • 61 Google Print, Books, and Library
      • 611 China Written Works Copyright Society CWWCS
    • 62 Links and cached data
    • 63 Google Map Maker
  • 7 Privacy
  • 8 Censorship
    • 81 Web search
    • 82 China
    • 83 Turkey
    • 84 AdSense/AdWords
    • 85 YouTube
    • 86 Ungoogleable
    • 87 Russia
  • 9 Other
    • 91 Energy consumption
    • 92 Google bus protests
    • 93 Google Video
    • 94 Search within search
    • 95 Naming of Go programming language
    • 96 Potential security threats
    • 97 Politics
    • 98 Where's the Fair Use
    • 99 YouTube user comments
    • 910 Zero-rating
    • 911 2016 April Fools Joke
  • 10 See also
  • 11 References
  • 12 External links

Aggressive tax avoidance

Google has been accused by a number of countries of avoiding paying tens of billions of dollars of tax through a convoluted scheme of inter-company licensing agreements and transfers to tax havens For example, Google has used highly contrived and artificial distinctions to avoid paying billions of pounds in corporation tax owed by its UK operations On 16 May 2013, Margaret Hodge MP, the chair of the United Kingdom Public Accounts Committee accused Google's of being "calculated and unethical" over its use of the scheme In 2015, the UK Government introduced a new law intended to penalise Google and other large multinational corporations's artificial tax avoidance Google Chairman Eric Schmidt has claimed that this scheme of Google is "capitalism" and that he was "very proud of it" Schmidt was also criticised for his inaccurate use of the term 'capitalism' to describe billions of dollars being transferred into tax havens where no economic activity was actually taking place On 23 January 2016, Google agreed to make a payment of £130m to the UK tax authorities "in respect of previous years"

Google cut its taxes by $31 billion in the period of 2007 to 2009 using a technique that moves most of its foreign profits through Ireland and The Netherlands to Bermuda Afterwards, the company started to send £8 billion in profits a year to Bermuda Google's income shifting—involving strategies known to lawyers as the "Double Irish" and the "Dutch Sandwich"—helped reduce its overseas tax rate to 24 percent, the lowest of the top five US technology companies by market capitalization, according to regulatory filings in six countries


According to Joe Wilcox of Microsoft-Watch, Google has increased its dominance of search, becoming an information gatekeeper, despite the conflict of interest between information gathering and the advertising surrounding that information His colleagues do not share the same view

European Union

See also: European Union vs Google

The European Commission, the European Union's executive arm, opened a formal inquiry into Google in 2010 over concerns that the company was abusing its dominant position in search The commission laid out its main points in May 2012, and early in 2013 Google came back with an offer to change its practices in certain search categories, hoping to settle the case and avoid a protracted antitrust inquiry At a news conference on July 17, 2013 Joaquín Almunia, the European Union competition commissioner, said that he "concluded that the proposals that Google sent to us months ago are not enough to overcome our concerns" and he had written to Eric Schmidt, Google's executive chairman, "asking Google to present better proposals or improved proposals"

US antitrust issues

In the case of the now-defunct Google-Yahoo! deal of 2008—a pact for Google to sell advertising on Yahoo! search pages—the US Department of Justice found that the deal would be "materially reducing important competitive rivalry between the two companies" and would violate the Sherman Antitrust Act

In testimony before a US Senate antitrust panel in September 2011, Eric Schmidt, Google's chairman, said that "the Internet is the ultimate level playing field" where users were "one click away" from competitors Beyond the existence of alternatives, Google's large market share was another aspect of the debate, as this exchange between Senator Herb Kohl and Mr Schmidt at the September Senate hearing illustrates:

Senator Kohl asked: "But you do recognize that in the words that are used and antitrust kind of oversight, your market share constitutes monopoly, dominant – special power dominant – special power dominant for a monopoly firm You recognize you're in that area" Schmidt replied: "I would agree, sir, that we're in that area I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding of monopoly findings is this is a judicial process"

During the hearing Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, accused Google of cooking its search results to favor its own services Mr Schmidt replied, "Senator, I can assure we haven’t cooked anything"

In testimony before the same Senate panel, Jeffrey Katz and Jeremy Stoppelman, the chief executives from Google's competitors Nextag and Yelp, said that Google tilts search results in its own favor, limiting choice and stifling competition

In October 2012, it was reported that the US Federal Trade Commission staff were preparing a recommendation that the government sue Google on antitrust grounds The areas of concern include accusations of manipulating the search results to favor Google services such as Google Shopping for buying goods and Google Places for advertising local restaurants and businesses; whether Google's automated advertising marketplace, AdWords, discriminates against advertisers from competing online commerce services like comparison shopping sites and consumer review Web sites; whether Google's contracts with smartphone makers and carriers prevent them from removing or modifying Google products, such as its Android operating system or Google search; and Google's use of its smartphone patents A likely outcome of the antitrust investigations is a negotiated settlement where Google would agree not to discriminate in favor of its products over smaller competitors Federal Trade Commission ended its investigation during a period which the co-founder of Google, Larry Page, had met with individuals at the White House and the Federal Trade Commission, leading to voluntary changes by Google; since January 2009 to March 2015 employees of Google have met with officials in the White House about 230 times according to the Wall Street Journal

Russia antitrust case

In September 2015 the Federal Antimonopoly Service FAS Russia found Google guilty in abusing its dominant position in the market of mobile applications by requiring phone-makers to pre-install its apps on Android phones The conditions included mandatory preset of Google applications and the search system and their mandatory placement on the priority positions on the main device screen which resulted in banning applications from other mobile-developers FAS issued a determination to eliminate the violation by November 2015 Google disagreed with the FAS decision and filed a lawsuit to Arbitration Court In August The Arbitration Appeal Court confirmed legitimacy and reasonableness of the decision of the Federal Antimonopoly Service Such decision means Google must execute the determination and inform all users with OS Android phones they can switch to applications of competitors Moreover, Google is paying a fine in the amount amount from 1% to 15% of their revenue on the Russian market in 2014

This investigation was initiated in February 2015 by company`s biggest rival in Russia Yandex technology company

Possible misuse of search results

In 2006/2007, a group of Austrian researchers observed a tendency to misuse the Google engine as a "reality interface" Ordinary users as well as journalists tend to rely on the first pages of Google search, assuming that everything not listed there is either not important or simply does not exist The researchers say that "Google has become the main interface for our whole reality To be precise: with the Google interface the user gets the impression that the search results imply a kind of totality In fact, one only sees a small part of what one could see if one also integrates other research tools"

Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google

Eric Schmidt, Google's chief executive, said in a 2007 interview with the Financial Times: "The goal is to enable Google users to be able to ask the question such as 'What shall I do tomorrow' and 'What job shall I take'" Schmidt reaffirmed this during a 2010 interview with the Wall Street Journal: "I actually think most people don't want Google to answer their questions, they want Google to tell them what they should be doing next"

Numerous companies and individuals, for example, MyTriggerscom and transport tycoon Sir Brian Souter have voiced concerns regarding the fairness of Google's PageRank and search results after their web sites disappeared from Google's first-page results In the case of MyTriggerscom, the Ohio-based shopping comparison search site accused Google of favoring its own services in search results although the judge eventually ruled that the site failed to show harm to other similar businesses

The Aliyun OS affair

Google forced its partner Acer to cancel a planned announcement of an Aliyun OS powered smartphone in September 2012, because the Google senior VP Andy Rubin said that Acer is not allowed to work on a non-compatible "fork" of Android if they want to stay in the Open Handset Alliance The VP of the Chinese company Alibaba, the developer of Aliyun OS, responded by arguing that Aliyun is not a fork, and criticised Android for not actually being open, since Google is in control of the app market through Google Play

Page Rank

Main article: PageRank

Danger of ranging manipulation

See also: Google bombing and Search neutrality

The page ranking algorithm of Google can and has been manipulated for political and humorous reasons To illustrate the view that Google's search engine could be subjected to manipulation, Google Watch implemented a Google bomb by linking the phrase "out-of-touch executives" to Google's own page on its corporate management The attempt was mistakenly attributed to disgruntled Google employees by The New York Times, which later printed a correction

Daniel Brandt started the Google Watch website and has criticized Google's PageRank algorithms, saying that they discriminate against new websites and favor established sites Chris Beasley, who started Google Watch-Watch, disagrees, saying that Mr Brandt overstates the amount of discrimination that new websites face and that new websites will naturally rank lower when the ranking is based on a site's "reputation" In Google's world a site's reputation is in part determined by how many and which other sites link to it links from sites with a "better" reputation of their own carry more weight Since new sites will seldom be as heavily linked as older more established sites, they aren't as well known, won't have as much of a reputation, and will receive a lower page ranking

In testimony before a US Senate antitrust panel in September 2011, Jeffrey Katz, the chief executive of NexTag, said that Google's business interests conflict with its engineering commitment to an open-for-all Internet and that: "Google doesn't play fair Google rigs its results, biasing in favor of Google Shopping and against competitors like us" Jeremy Stoppelman, the chief of Yelp, said sites like his have to cooperate with Google because it is the gateway to so many users and "Google then gives its own product preferential treatment" In earlier testimony at the same hearing Eric Schmidt, Google's chairman, said that Google does not "cook the books" to favor its own products and services

Google Shopping rankings

Main article: Google Shopping

In late May 2012, Google announced that they will no longer be maintaining a strict separation between search results and advertising Google Shopping will be replaced with a nearly identical interface, according to the announcement, but only paid advertisers will be listed instead of the neutral aggregate listings shown previously Furthermore, rankings will be determined primarily by which advertisers place the highest "bid", though the announcement does not elaborate on this process The transition will be complete in the fall of 2012

As a result of this change to Google Shopping, Microsoft, who operates the competing search engine Bing, launched a public information campaign titled Scroogled The ad campaign was developed by leading political campaign strategist Mark Penn

It is unclear how consumers will react to this move Critics charge that Google has effectively abandoned its "Don't be evil" motto and that small businesses will be unable to compete against their larger counterparts There is also concern that consumers who did not see this announcement will be unaware that they are now looking at paid advertisements and that the top results are no longer determined solely based on relevance but instead will be manipulated according to which company paid the most

Copyright issues

Google Print, Books, and Library

Main articles: Google Books, Google Books Library Project, and Authors Guild v Google

Google's ambitious plans to scan millions of books and make them readable through its search engine have been criticized for copyright infringement The Association for Learned and Professional Society Publishers and the Association of American University Presses both issued statements strongly opposing Google Print, stating that "Google, an enormously successful company, claims a sweeping right to appropriate the property of others for its own commercial use unless it is told, case by case and instance by instance, not to"

China Written Works Copyright Society CWWCS

In a separate dispute in November 2009, the China Written Works Copyright Society CWWCS, which protects Chinese writers' copyrights, accused Google of scanning 18,000 books by 570 Chinese writers without authorization, for its Google Books library Toward the end of 2009 representatives of the CWWCS said talks with Google about copyright issues are progressing well, that first they "want Google to admit their mistake and apologize", then talk about compensation, while at the same time they "don't want Google to give up China in its digital library project" On November 20, 2009, Google agreed to provide a list of Chinese books it had scanned, but did not admit having "infringed" copyright laws In a January 9, 2010 statement the head of Google Books in the Asia-Pacific said "communications with Chinese writers have not been good enough" and apologized to the writers

Links and cached data

Kazaa and the Church of Scientology have used the Digital Millennium Copyright Act DMCA to demand that Google remove references to allegedly copyrighted material on their sites

Search engines such as Google's that link to sites in "good faith" fall under the safe harbor provisions of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act which is part of DMCA If they remove links to infringing content after receiving a take down notice, they are not liable Google removes links to infringing content when requested, provided that supporting evidence is supplied However, it is sometimes difficult to judge whether or not certain sites are infringing and Google and other search engines will sometimes refuse to remove web pages from its index To complicate matters there have been conflicting rulings from US courts on whether simply linking to infringing content constitutes "contributory infringement" or not

The New York Times has complained that the caching of their content during a web crawl, a feature utilized by search engines including Google Web Search, violates copyright Google observes Internet standard mechanisms for requesting that caching be disabled via the robotstxt file, which is another mechanism that allows operators of a website to request that part or all of their site not be included in search engine results, or via META tags, which allow a content editor to specify whether a document can be crawled or archived, or whether the links on the document can be followed The US District Court of Nevada ruled that Google's caches do not constitute copyright infringement under American law in Field v Google and Parker v Google

Google Map Maker

Google Map Maker allows user contributed data to be put into the Google Maps service, similar to OpenStreetMap it includes concepts such as organising mapping parties and mapping for humanitarian efforts It has been criticised for taking work done for free by the general public and claiming commercial ownership of it without returning any contributions back to the commons as their restrictive license makes it incompatible with most open projects by preventing commercial use or use by competitive services


Main article: Privacy concerns regarding Google

Google's March 1, 2012 privacy change, enables the company to share data across a wide variety of services This includes embedded services in millions of third-party websites using Adsense and Analytics The policy was widely criticized as creating an environment that discourages Internet innovation by making Internet users more fearful online

In December 2009, after privacy concerns were raised, Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, declared: "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place If you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines—including Google—do retain this information for some time and it's important, for example, that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act and it is possible that all that information could be made available to the authorities"

Privacy International has raised concerns regarding the dangers and privacy implications of having a centrally located, widely popular data warehouse of millions of Internet users' searches, and how under controversial existing US law, Google can be forced to hand over all such information to the US government In its 2007 Consultation Report, Privacy International ranked Google as "Hostile to Privacy", its lowest rating on their report, making Google the only company in the list to receive that ranking

At the Techonomy conference in 2010, Eric Schmidt predicted that "true transparency and no anonymity" is the way forward for the internet: "In a world of asynchronous threats it is too dangerous for there not to be some way to identify you We need a name service for people Governments will demand it" He also said that "If I look at enough of your messaging and your location, and use artificial intelligence, we can predict where you are going to go Show us 14 photos of yourself and we can identify who you are You think you don't have 14 photos of yourself on the internet You've got Facebook photos!"

In the summer of 2016, Google quietly dropped its ban on personally-identifiable info in its DoubleClick ad service Google's privacy policy was changed to state it "may" combine web-browsing records obtained through DoubleClick with what the company learns from the use of other Google services While new users were automatically opted-in, existing users were asked if they wanted to opt-in, and it remains possible to opt-out by going to the Activity controls in the My Account page of a Google account ProPublica states that "The practical result of the change is that the DoubleClick ads that follow people around on the web may now be customized to them based on your name and other information Google knows about you It also means that Google could now, if it wished to, build a complete portrait of a user by name, based on everything they write in email, every website they visit and the searches they conduct" Google contacted ProPublica to correct the fact that it doesn't "currently" use Gmail keywords to target web ads


Main article: Censorship by Google

Google has been criticized for various instances of censoring its search results, many times in compliance with the laws of various countries, most notably while it operated in China from January 2006 to March 2010

Web search

See also: Censorship by Google § Google Search

As of December 12, 2012, Google's SafeSearch feature applies to image searches in the United States Prior to the change three SafeSearch settings—"on", "moderate", and "off"—were available to users Following the change, two "Filter explicit results" settings—"on" and "off"—were newly established The former and new "on" settings are similar, and exclude explicit images from search results The new "off" setting still permits explicit images to appear in search results, but users need to enter more specific search requests, and no direct equivalent of the old "off" setting exists following the change The change brings image search results into line with Google's existing settings for web and video search

Some users have stated that the lack of a completely unfiltered option amounts to "censorship" by Google A Google spokesperson disagreed, saying that Google is "not censoring any adult content," but "want to show users exactly what they are looking for—but we aim not to show sexually-explicit results unless a user is specifically searching for them"

The search term "bisexual" was blacklisted for Instant Search until 2012, when it was removed at the request of the BiNet USA advocacy organisation


See also: Google China

Google has been involved in censorship of certain sites in specific countries and regions Until March 2010, Google adhered to the Internet censorship policies of China, enforced by filters colloquially known as "The Great Firewall of China" Googlecn search results were filtered to remove some results concerning the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, sites supporting the independence movements of Tibet and Taiwan, the Falun Gong movement, and other information perceived to be harmful to the People's Republic of China PRC Google claimed that some censorship is necessary in order to keep the Chinese government from blocking Google entirely, as occurred in 2002 The company claims it did not plan to give the government information about users who search for blocked content, and will inform users that content has been restricted if they attempt to search for it As of 2009, Google was the only major China-based search engine to explicitly inform the user when search results are blocked or hidden As of December 2012, Google no longer informs the user of possible censorship for certain queries during search

Some Chinese Internet users were critical of Google for assisting the Chinese government in repressing its own citizens, particularly those dissenting against the government and advocating for human rights Furthermore, Google had been denounced and called hypocritical by Free Media Movement for agreeing to China's demands while simultaneously fighting the United States government's requests for similar information Google China had also been condemned by Reporters Without Borders, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International

In 2009, China Central Television, Xinhua News Agency, and People's Daily all reported on Google's "dissemination of obscene information", and People's Daily claimed that "Google's 'don't be evil' motto becomes a fig leaf" The Chinese government imposed administrative penalties to Google China, and demanded a reinforcement of censorship

In 2010, according to a leaked diplomatic cable from the US Embassy in Beijing, there were reports that the Chinese Politburo directed the intrusion of Google's computer systems in a worldwide coordinated campaign of computer sabotage and the attempt to access information about Chinese dissidents, carried out by "government operatives, public security experts and Internet outlaws recruited by the Chinese government" The report suggested that it was part of an ongoing campaign in which attackers have "broken into American government computers and those of Western allies, the Dalai Lama and American businesses since 2002"

In response to the attack, Google announced that they were "no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Googlecn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all" On March 22, 2010, after talks with Chinese authorities failed to reach an agreement, the company redirected its censor-complying Google China service to its Google Hong Kong service, which is outside the jurisdiction of Chinese censorship laws From the business perspective, many recognize that the move was likely to affect Google's profits: "Google is going to pay a heavy price for its move, which is why it deserves praise for refusing to censor its service in China" However, at least as of March 23, 2010, "The Great Firewall" continues to censor search results from the Hong Kong portal, wwwgooglecomhk as it does with the US portal, wwwgooglecom for controversial terms such as "Falun gong" and "the June 4 incident" Tiananmen Square incident


See also: Google Turkey

Google has been involved in censorship of Google Maps satellite imagery countrywide affecting Android & iOS apps using com, tr, and tld automatically PC users can easily evade this censorship by just removing tr, and tld from the URL but the same technique is impossible with smart phone apps


Main articles: Google AdSense and Google AdWords

In February 2003, Google stopped showing the advertisements of Oceana, a non-profit organization protesting a major cruise ship operation's sewage treatment practices Google cited its editorial policy at the time, stating "Google does not accept advertising if the ad or site advocates against other individuals, groups, or organizations" The policy was later changed

In April 2008, Google refused to run ads for a UK Christian group opposed to abortion, explaining that "At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain 'abortion and religion-related content'" The UK Christian group sued Google for discrimination, and as a result in September 2008 Google changed its policy and anti-abortion ads were allowed

In August 2008, Google closed the AdSense account of a site that carried a negative view of Scientology, the second closing of such a site within 3 months It is not certain if the account revocations actually were on the grounds of anti-religious content, however the cases have raised questions about Google's terms in regards to AdSense/AdWords The AdSense policy states that "Sites displaying Google ads may not include advocacy against any individual, group, or organization", which allows Google to revoke the above-mentioned AdSense accounts

In May 2011, Google cancelled the AdWord advertisement purchased by a Dublin sex worker rights group named "Turn Off the Blue Light" TOBL, claiming that it represented an "egregious violation" of company ad policy by "selling adult sexual services" However, TOBL is a nonprofit campaign for sex worker rights and is not advertising or selling adult sexual services In July, after TOBL members held a protest outside Google's European headquarters in Dublin and wrote to complain, Google relented, reviewed the group's website, found its content to be advocating a political position, and restored the AdWord advertisement

In June 2012, Google rejected the Australian Sex Party's ads for AdWords and sponsored search results for the July 12 by-election for the state seat of Melbourne, saying the Party breached its rules which prevent solicitation of donations by a website that did not display tax exempt status Although the Sex Party amended its website to display tax deductibility information, Google continued to ban the ads The ads were reinstated on election eve after it was reported in the media that the Sex Party was considering suing Google On September 13, 2012 the Party lodged formal complaints against Google with the US Department of Justice and the Australian competition watchdog, accusing Google of "unlawful interference in the conduct of a state election in Victoria with corrupt intent" in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act


Main article: YouTube § Community policy See also: Censorship of YouTube, YouTube § Controversial content, and Censorship by Google § YouTube

YouTube is a video sharing website acquired by Google in 2006 YouTube's Terms of Service prohibits the posting of videos which violate copyrights or depict pornography, illegal acts, gratuitous violence, or hate speech User-posted videos that violate such terms may be removed and replaced with a message stating: "This video is no longer available because its content violated YouTube's Terms of Service"

YouTube has been criticized by national governments for failing to police content For example, videos have been critically accused for being "left up", among other videos featuring unwarranted violence or strong ill-intention against people who probably didn't want this to be published In 2006, Thailand blocked access to YouTube for users with Thai IP addresses Thai authorities identified 20 offensive videos and demanded that YouTube remove them before it would unblock any YouTube content In 2007 a Turkish judge ordered access to YouTube blocked because of content that insulted Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, which is a crime under Turkish law On February 22, 2008, Pakistan Telecommunications Authority PTA attempted to block regional access to YouTube following a government order The attempt inadvertently caused a worldwide YouTube blackout that took 2 hours to correct Four days later, PTA lifted the ban after YouTube removed controversial religious comments made by a Dutch Member of Parliament concerning Islam

YouTube has also been criticized by its users for attempting to censor content In November 2007, the account of Wael Abbas, a well known Egyptian activist who posted videos of police brutality, voting irregularities and anti-government demonstrations, was blocked for three days

In February 2008, a video produced by the American Life League that accused a Planned Parenthood television commercial of promoting recreational sex was removed, then reinstated two days later In October, a video by political speaker Pat Condell criticizing the British government for officially sanctioning sharia law courts in Britain was removed, then reinstated two days later In response, his fans uploaded copies of the video themselves, and the National Secular Society wrote to YouTube in protest

YouTube also pulled a video of columnist Michelle Malkin showing violence by Muslim extremists Siva Vaidhyanathan, a professor of Media Studies at the University of Virginia, commented that while, in his opinion, Michelle Malkin disseminates bigotry in her blog, "that does not mean that this particular video is bigoted; it's not But because it's by Malkin, it's a target"

YouTube censors videos by country on its site For example, videos from certain countries are blocked from being viewed in the United States and other countries on copyright grounds But some users allege that that is blatant censorship by YouTube because it forbids users from viewing the videos that they want to see YouTube has received numerous criticisms for blocking videos containing content from certain entertainment companies YouTube has been criticized for heavy-handed censorship Some allege that this censorship is xenophobic because it blocks people from enjoying foreign works because they lived in a foreign country where the content has been blocked

YouTube has also been given feedback concerning other YouTube users embedding the headings for blocked content in view of increasing the views on their own videos which have no relevance to content uploaded into YouTube The results appear in Google Search but not in the video content This practice of blocking video content rather than removing content serves no purpose only to allow the propagation of blocked content throughout the Internet which may not happen if the material in question is removed

YouTube launched a localized Pakistani version of its website for the users in Pakistan in order to censor content considered blasphemic by the Pakistani government as a part of its deal with the latter The three-year ban on YouTube by Pakistani government was subsequently lifted


Main article: Ungoogleable

In 2013, Google successfully prevented the Swedish Language Council from including the Swedish version of the word "ungoogleable" "ogooglebar" in its list of new words Google objected to its definition which referred to web searches in general without mentioning Google specifically and the Council was forced to remove it to avoid legal confrontation with Google They also accused Google of "trying to control the Swedish language"


Since 2015, Google restricts access to software in Crimea and Sevastopol after the USA issued sanctions against the Russian government due to the 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine


Energy consumption

See also: Google Energy

Google has been criticized for the high amount of energy used to maintain its servers, but was praised by Greenpeace for the use of renewable sources of energy to run them Google has pledged to spend millions of dollars to investigate cheap, clean, renewable energy, and has installed solar panels on the roofs at its Mountain View facilities In 2010, Google also invested $39 million in wind power

Google bus protests

Main article: Google bus protests

In late 2013, activists in the San Francisco Bay Area began protesting the use of shuttle buses by Google and other tech companies, viewing them as symbols of gentrification and displacement in a city where the rapid growth of the tech sector has driven up housing prices

Google Video

Main article: Google video

On August 15, 2007 Google discontinued its Download-to-own/Download-to-rent DTO/DTR program Some videos previously purchased for ownership under that program were no longer viewable when the embedded Digital Rights Management DRM licenses were revoked Google gave refunds for the full amount spent on videos using "gift certificates" or "bonuses" to their customers' "Google Checkout Account" After a public uproar, Google issued full refunds to the credit cards of the Google Video users without revoking the gift certificates

Search within search

Main article: Google search

For some search results, Google provides a secondary search box that can be used to search within a website identified from the first search It sparked controversy among some online publishers and retailers When performing a second search within a specific website, advertisements from competing and rival companies often showed up together with the results from the website being searched This has the potential to draw users away from the website they were originally searching "While the service could help increase traffic, some users could be siphoned away as Google uses the prominence of the brands to sell ads, typically to competing companies" In order to combat this controversy, Google has offered to turn off this feature for companies who request to have it removed

According to software engineer Ben Lee and Product Manager Jack Menzel, the idea for search within search originated from the way users were searching It appeared that users were often not finding exactly what they needed while trying to explore within a company site "Teleporting" on the web, where users need only type part of the name of a website into Google no need to remember the entire URL in order to find the correct site, is what helps Google users complete their search Google took this concept a step further and instead of just "teleporting", users could type in keywords to search within the website of their choice

Naming of Go programming language

Main articles: Go programming language and Go! programming language

Google is criticized for naming their programming language "Go" while there is already an existing programming language called "Go!"

Potential security threats

Google has been criticised for providing information that could potentially be useful to terrorists In the UK during March 2010, Liberal Democrats MP Paul Keetch and unnamed military officers criticised Google for including pictures of the outside of the headquarters of the SAS at RAF Base Hereford, stating that terrorists might use this information to plan attacks, rather than having to drive past it themselves Google responded that there was no appreciable security risk and that it had no intention of removing the pictures

On Google Maps, street view and 360 degree images of military bases were removed at the Pentagon's request


Despite being one of the world's largest and most influential companies, unlike many other technology companies, Google does not disclose its political spending In August 2010, New York City Public Advocate, Bill de Blasio launched a national campaign urging the corporation to disclose all of its political spending

Google sponsors several non-profit lobbying groups, such as the Coalition for a Digital Economy Coadec in the UK Google has sponsored meetings of the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute who have had speakers including libertarian Republican and Tea Party member, and Senator for Kentucky, Rand Paul

In 2013, Google joined the American Legislative Exchange Council ALEC In September 2014, Google chairman Eric Schmidt announced the company would leave ALEC for "lying" about climate change and "hurting our children"

There are many revolving door examples between Google and the US government This includes: 53 revolving door moves between Google and the White House; 22 former White House officials who left the administration to work for Google and 31 Google executives who joined the White House; 45 Obama for America campaign staffers leaving for Google or Google controlled companies; 38 revolving door moves between Google and government positions involving national security, intelligence or the Department of Defense; 23 revolving door moves between Google and the State Department; and 18 Pentagon officials moving to Google

Where's the Fair Use

On February 16, 2016, internet reviewer Doug Walker The Nostalgia Critic posted a video about his concerns related to YouTube's current copyright claiming system apparently being tipped in favor of those who make the claims rather than the creators, despite many of those videos being reported as covered under Fair Use laws The video featured stories of other YouTubers' experiences with the copyright system, including fellow Channel Awesome producer Brad Jones, who received a strike on his channel for uploading a film review that took place in a parked car and contained no footage from the film itself In the video, Walker encouraged other YouTubers and viewers to spread the message using the hashtag #WTFU Where's the Fair Use on social media The hashtag spread among multiple YouTubers, who gave their support to Walker and Channel Awesome and relaying their own stories of issues with YouTube's copyright system, including Dan Murrell of Screen Junkies, and Let's Play producers Mark Fishbach Markiplier and Seán William McLoughlin Jacksepticeye

Ten days later, on February 26, 2016, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki tweeted a link to a post from the YouTube Help Forum and thanked the community for bringing the issue to their attention The post, written by a member of the YouTube Policy Team named Spencer no last name was given, stated that they will be working to strengthen communication between creators and YouTube Support and "improvements to increase transparency into the status of monetization claims"

YouTube user comments

Main article: YouTube § User comments

Most YouTube videos allow users to leave comments, and these have attracted attention for the negative aspects of both their form and content In 2006, Time praised Web 20 for enabling "community and collaboration on a scale never seen before", and added that YouTube "harnesses the stupidity of crowds as well as its wisdom Some of the comments on YouTube make you weep for the future of humanity just for the spelling alone, never mind the obscenity and the naked hatred" The Guardian in 2009 described users' comments on YouTube as:

Juvenile, aggressive, misspelled, sexist, homophobic, swinging from raging at the contents of a video to providing a pointlessly detailed description followed by a LOL, YouTube comments are a hotbed of infantile debate and unashamed ignorance – with the occasional burst of wit shining through

In September 2008, The Daily Telegraph commented that YouTube was "notorious" for "some of the most confrontational and ill-formed comment exchanges on the internet", and reported on YouTube Comment Snob, "a new piece of software that blocks rude and illiterate posts" The Huffington Post noted in April 2012 that finding comments on YouTube that appear "offensive, stupid and crass" to the "vast majority" of the people is hardly difficult

On November 6, 2013, Google implemented a new comment system that requires all YouTube users to use a Google+ account to comment on videos, thereby making the comment system Google+-orientated The corporation stated that the change is necessary to personalize comment sections for viewers, in response to an overwhelmingly negative public response—even YouTube co-founder Jawed Karim expressed disdain by writing on his channel: "why the fuck do I need a Google+ account to comment on a video" The official YouTube announcement received over 59,000 "thumbs down" votes and only just over 3,300 "thumbs up" votes, while an online petition demanding Google+'s removal gained more than 230,000 signatures in just over two months Writing in the Newsday blog Silicon Island, Chase Melvin noted: "Google+ is nowhere near as popular a social media network as Facebook, but it's essentially being forced upon millions of YouTube users who don't want to lose their ability to comment on videos" In the same article Melvin adds:

Perhaps user complaints are justified, but the idea of revamping the old system isn't so bad Think of the crude, misogynistic and racially-charged mudslinging that has transpired over the last eight years on YouTube without any discernible moderation Isn't any attempt to curb unidentified libelers worth a shot The system is far from perfect, but Google should be lauded for trying to alleviate some of the damage caused by irate YouTubers hiding behind animosity and anonymity


Google has supported net neutrality in the US, while opposing it in India by supporting zero-rating

2016 April Fools Joke

On April 1, 2016, the Mic Drop April fools joke in Gmail caused real damages for users who accidentally clicked the button Google installed on that occasion

See also

  • Google portal
  • Don't be evil
  • Google litigation
  • High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
  • Googlization
  • Filter bubble
  • History of Google
  • Criticisms of software and websites


  1. ^ See: List of Google products
  2. ^ "Financial Tables" Google, Inc Retrieved July 5, 2010 
  3. ^ Vise, David A October 21, 2005 "Online Ads Give Google Huge Gain in Profit" The Washington Post Retrieved February 14, 2010 
  4. ^ Google Corporate Page, accessed October 17, 2011
  5. ^ "Tax Research UK  » The biggest threat to democracy comes from companies like Google" Tax Research UK 
  6. ^ a b c Simon Bowers "MP on Google tax avoidance scheme: 'I think that you do evil'" the Guardian 
  7. ^ "Budget 2015: 'Google Tax' introduction confirmed" BBC News 
  8. ^ "Google's tax avoidance is called 'capitalism', says chairman Eric Schmidt" Telegraphcouk December 12, 2012 
  9. ^ Nikhil Kumar, Oliver Wright December 13, 2012 "Google boss: I'm very proud of our tax avoidance scheme" The Independent 
  10. ^ Simon Hoggart "A highly taxing session with the public accounts committee – Simon Hoggart's sketch" the Guardian 
  11. ^ "The post box in Bermuda numbered 666 which receives Google profits worth £8BILLION a year" Daily Mail January 31, 2016 Retrieved August 23, 2016 
  12. ^ Jesse Drucker October 21, 2010 "Google 24% Rate Shows How $60 Billion Lost to Tax Loopholes" Bloomberg Google is 'flying a banner of doing no evil, and then they're perpetrating evil under our noses,' said Abraham J Briloff, a professor emeritus of accounting at Baruch College in New York who has examined Google's tax disclosures 'Who is it that paid for the underlying concept on which they built these billions of dollars of revenues' Briloff said 'It was paid for by the United States citizenry' 
  13. ^ Cade Metz October 22, 2010 "Google slips $31bn through 'Double Irish' tax loophole" The Register Basically, Google licenses foreign rights to its intellectual property to an Irish subsidiary known as Google Ireland Holdings, and this outfit owns a separate subsidiary known as Google Ireland Limited It's Google Ireland Limited – the second subsidiar – that actually sells advertising across the globe Last year, it accounted for 88 per cent of Google's $125 billion in non-US sales 
  14. ^ "The Google Monopoly Begins" eWeek Microsoft Watch December 20, 2007 
  15. ^ "Europe Wants More Concessions From Google", James Kanter, New York Times, July 17, 2013
  16. ^ Fabio, Michelle September 13, 2011 "Is Google a Monopoly" LegalZoom 
  17. ^ a b c d "Google's Competitors Square Off Against Its Leader", Steve Lohr, New York Times, September 21, 2011
  18. ^ "Is Google A Monopoly 'We're In That Area,' Admits Schmidt", Matt Rosoff, Business Insider, September 21, 2011
  19. ^ "Drafting Antitrust Case, FTC Raises Pressure on Google", Steve Lohr, New York Times, October 12, 2012 Retrieved October 3, 2013
  20. ^ Mullins, Brody 24 March 2015 "Google Makes Most of Close Ties to White House" Wall Street Journal Retrieved 24 March 2015 
  21. ^ The Court: Google violated antimonopoly legislation, fasgovru March 14, 2016
  22. ^ Appeal Court supported FAS in a dispute with Google, fasgovru August 17, 2016
  23. ^ Yandex vs Google , fasgovru
  24. ^ Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google, H Maurer Ed, Graz University of Technology, Austria, September 30, 2007, 187 pp Retrieved October 3, 2013
  25. ^ Google's goal: to organize your daily life Financial Times
  26. ^ Google and the Search for the Future Wall Street Journal
  27. ^ Dan Levine September 1, 2011 "Google wins antitrust victory in Ohio case" Reuters UK Retrieved September 14, 2011 
  28. ^ "Disappearing tycoon Souter blames Google" BBC News September 12, 2011 
  29. ^ J Angelo Racoma, Alibaba: Aliyun OS is 'not a fork' of Android, Android authority September 17, 2012
  30. ^ Bogdan Petrovan, Google speaks up on the Acer/Alibaba affair, Android authority September 20, 2012
  31. ^ Hansell, Saul; John Markoff June 22, 2004 "Google Edits Its Prospectus to Highlight Risk of Loss" The New York Times 
  32. ^ "Corrections" The New York Times June 25, 2004 Retrieved April 30, 2010 
  33. ^ Farhad Manjoo August 30, 2002 "Conspiracy Researcher Says Google's No Good" AlterNet Retrieved December 12, 2009 
  34. ^ "Why Daniel Brandt doesn't like Google PageRank", Chris Beasley, Google Watch Watch, accessed October 18, 2011
  35. ^ "Google Commerce: Building a better shopping experience" Googlecommerceblogspotcom Retrieved October 30, 2012 
  36. ^ "Have you been Scroogled Try Bing—we don't limit your shopping choices" scroogledcom 
  37. ^ "Microsoft's Mark Penn Mistake – The tech giant is treating Google like a political rival" 
  38. ^ "Google Shopping Listings Will No Longer be Free to Advertisers | RKG Blog" Rimmkaufmancom Retrieved October 30, 2012 
  39. ^ Holbrook, Ben "Paid Google Shopping – Another Step Towards Google's Master Plan" State of Search Retrieved October 30, 2012 
  40. ^ "France to oppose Google book scheme", Stanley Pignal, Financial Times, September 8, 2009
  41. ^ "Google Print Faces More Opposition", Keith Regan, E-Commerce Times, August 30, 2005
  42. ^ "A Copyright Complaint From China", Forbes, October 21, 2009 Retrieved November 17, 2013
  43. ^ "Progress in copyright talks with Google", Zhang Lei, Global Times English edition, December 28, 2009 Retrieved November 17, 2013
  44. ^ "Google apologises to Chinese writers over book flap", Agence France-Presse AFP, January 10, 2010 Retrieved November 17, 2013
  45. ^ "Google Pulls P2P Links Over Kazaa Copyright Claims", Jay Lyman, TechNewsWorld, September 2, 2003
  46. ^ Gallagher, David F April 22, 2002 "New Economy; A copyright dispute with the Church of Scientology is forcing Google to do some creative linking" The New York Times Retrieved April 30, 2010 
  47. ^ Chris Tew September 12, 2006 "Linking to infringing content is probably illegal in the US" WebTVWire Retrieved October 12, 2006 
  48. ^ See Perfect 10, Inc v Google Inc 2007 for a ruling that links do not constitute infringement See Universal City Studios, Inc v Reimerdes 2001, Intellectual Reserve v Utah Lighthouse Ministry 1999, and Comcast of Illinois X, LLC v Hightech Electronics, Inc 2004 for three rulings that links are infringing
  49. ^ "Google cache raises copyright concerns", Stefanie Olsen, CNET News, July 9, 2003
  50. ^ "Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Blake A Field vs Google, Inc, No CV-S-04-0413-RCJ-LRL", Judge Robert C Jones, United States District Court District of Nevada, January 12, 2006
  51. ^ Memorandum & Order, Gordon Roy Parker v Google, Inc, No 04-CV-3918, Judge R Barclay Surrick, United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania, March 10, 2006
  52. ^ "Google Map Maker" Retrieved February 12, 2015 
  53. ^ "We Need to Stop Google's Exploitation of Open Communities", Mikel Maron, April 11, 2011
  54. ^ "Google Map Maker" Retrieved February 12, 2015 
  55. ^ "Why Google MapMaker is not Open", Mikel Maron, March 16, 2010
  56. ^ "Google Privacy Policy" March 1, 2012 
  57. ^ "Will We Ever Get Strong Internet Privacy Rules" Time March 5, 2012 
  58. ^ Cade, Metz December 7, 2009 "Google chief: Only miscreants worry about net privacy" The Register 
  59. ^ a b "Google ranked 'worst' on privacy" BBC News June 11, 2007 
  60. ^ "Consultation Report: Race to the Bottom 2007", Privacy International, June 9, 2007
  61. ^ Delichatsios, Stefanie Alki; Sonuyi, Temitope, "Get to Know GoogleBecause They Know You", MIT, Ethics and Law on the Electronic Frontier, 6805, December 14, 2005
  62. ^ "No anonymity on future web says Google CEO" THINQcouk August 5, 2010 Archived from the original on August 15, 2010 Retrieved August 7, 2010 
  63. ^ Angwin, Julia October 21, 2016 "Google Has Quietly Dropped Ban on Personally Identifiable Web Tracking" ProPublica Retrieved October 23, 2016 
  64. ^ Whittaker, Zack December 12, 2012 "Googlecom now 'censors' explicit content from image searches" ZDNet Retrieved June 14, 2013 
  65. ^ "Google Removes 'Bisexual' From Its List of Dirty Words", Michelle Garcia, Advocatecom, September 11, 2012 Retrieved March 14, 2014
  66. ^ "Google censors itself for China" BBC January 25, 2006 Retrieved January 31, 2008 
  67. ^ The Great Wall: China Against the World, 1000 BC–AD 2000 Archived March 14, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Julia Lovell, Grove/Atlantic, March 2007, ISBN 978-0-8021-4297-9
  68. ^ "Google move 'black day' for China" BBC News January 25, 2006
  69. ^ "Google quietly removed search warning message in China in early December 2012" Engadget January 4, 2013
  70. ^ "Google: Stop participating in China's Propaganda", Students for a Free Tibet, Yahoo! Groups, February 1, 2006
  71. ^ a b AFX News January 25, 2006 "Google bows to Chinese censorship with new search site" Forbes Archived from the original on November 21, 2008 
  72. ^ "3 Google, Inc" in Race to the Bottom': Corporate Complicity in Chinese Internet Censorship, Part IV How Multinational Internet Companies assist Government Censorship in China, Human Rights Watch, Vol 18 No 8C, August 2006
  73. ^ "Google does not censor: take action to defend freedom of information" Archived December 30, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Amnesty International, May 10, 2006
  74. ^ "Google's "don't be evil" motto becomes a fig leaf 谷歌"不作恶"口号沦为遮羞布" People's Daily June 19, 2009 Retrieved June 27, 2009  English translation
  75. ^ "Investigating on Google China's obscene information, the public says "good"! 查处谷歌中国淫秽信息,公众都叫"好"!" People's Daily June 26, 2009 Retrieved June 27, 2009  English translation
  76. ^ 卫敏丽 June 19, 2009 "Relevant departments punished "Google China"'s dissemination of obscene information by law 有关部门对"谷歌中国"传播淫秽色情信息行为依法处罚" xinhuanet Retrieved June 26, 2009  English translation
  77. ^ Scott Shane and Andrew W Lehren November 28, 2010 "Leaked Cables Offer Raw Look at US Diplomacy" The New York Times Retrieved December 26, 2010 
  78. ^ "A new approach to China", David Drummond, SVP, Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer, Official Google Blog, January 12, 2010
  79. ^ "A new approach to China" Google Inc January 12, 2010 Retrieved January 17, 2010 
  80. ^ "Google's strategy in China deserves praise" Kansas City Star March 28, 2010 Archived from the original on April 1, 2010 Retrieved September 29, 2012 
  81. ^ A new approach to China: an update", David Drummond, SVP, Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer, Official Google Blog, March 22, 2010
  82. ^ Nicholas Carlson March 22, 2010 "BREAKING: Google Pulls Search Engine Out Of China" Business Insider 
  83. ^ Brian Womack March 23, 2010 "Google Ends Self-Censorship, Defies China Government Update4" Bloomberg News 
  84. ^ "Google Somewhat Lifts Oceana Ad Ban" WebProNews May 17, 2004 Archived from the original on January 30, 2009 
  85. ^ "Google AdSense Program Policies" Google May 27, 2011 
  86. ^ Simon, Caldwell April 9, 2008 "Christian group sues Google after search engine refuses to take its anti-abortion adverts" Daily Mail London Dublin-based advertising team replied: At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain 'abortion and religion-related content' 
  87. ^ "Google OKs Religious Groups' Abortion Ads – ABC News" Abcnewsgocom September 18, 2008 Retrieved October 30, 2012 
  88. ^ "Google murders second Anonymous AdSense account", Cade Metz, The Register, August 15, 2008
  89. ^ "Google AdSense Program Policies", AdSense Help, Google Inc
  90. ^ Turn Off the Blue Light Archived June 2, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, website
  91. ^ Paterson, Jody June 24, 2011 "Google tramples sex workers' rights" Victoria Times-Colonist Archived from the original on October 20, 2011 
  92. ^ Cusack, Jim August 7, 2011 "Google u-turn on sex worker group's advert" Sunday Independent 
  93. ^ No Sex Party please, we're Google Sydney Morning Herald September 13, 2012
  94. ^ "YouTube Community Guidelines" YouTube Retrieved May 9, 2007 
  95. ^ "like this one" 
  96. ^ a b Rosen, Jeffrey November 30, 2008 "Google's Gatekeepers" New York Times 
  97. ^ Ribeiro, John February 25, 2008 "Pakistan causes worldwide YouTube blackout" Macworld UK Retrieved December 23, 2010 
  98. ^ "Pakistan Drops YouTube Ban", CBS News/AP, February 11, 2009
  99. ^ "Pakistan welcomes back YouTube", Greg Sandoval, CNET News Blogs, February 26, 2008
  100. ^ "YouTube shuts down Egyptian anti-torture activist's account" Cable News Network November 29, 2007 
  101. ^ "YouTube reinstates account of Egyptian human rights activist" The CNN Wire: Friday, Nov 30 Cable News Network November 30, 2007 
  102. ^ "YouTube stops account of Egypt anti-torture activist", Cynthia Johnston, Reuters, November 27, 2007
  103. ^ "American Life League video yanked by YouTube" Catholic News Agency February 12, 2008 
  104. ^ "YouTube Concedes Error in Banning American Life League's Pro-Life Video" PR Newswire United Business Media February 14, 2008 
  105. ^ Beckford, Martin October 3, 2008 "YouTube censors comedian's anti-Sharia video called 'Welcome to Saudi Britain'" The Daily Telegraph London 
  106. ^ "Update: Welcome to Saudi Britain" ReligiousWatchcom October 5, 2008 
  107. ^ Rosen, Jeffrey November 30, 2008 "Google's Gatekeepers" The New York Times 
  108. ^ The Googlization of Everything and Why We Should Worry, Siva Vaidhyanatan, University of California Press, 2011, page 39, ISBN 978-0-520-25882-2
  109. ^ Network, The Dawn/Asia News "YouTube back in Pakistan with vague transparency" technologyinquirernet Retrieved 2016-03-01 
  110. ^ "What will Pakistanis see on YouTube" Deccan Herald Retrieved 2016-03-01 
  111. ^ Fanning, Sean March 26, 2013 "Google gets ungoogleable off Sweden's new word list" BBC News BBC Retrieved April 5, 2013 
  112. ^ Williams, Rob March 26, 2013 "'Ungoogleable' removed from list of Swedish words after row over definition with Google: California based search engine giant asked Swedish to amend definition" The Independent Retrieved April 5, 2013 
  113. ^ Irvine, Chris March 25, 2013 "Sweden rows with Google over term 'ungoogleable'" The Daily Telegraph Retrieved April 5, 2013 
  114. ^ "Keyword: Evil", Ginger Strand, Harpers Magazine, March 2008
  115. ^ Online Cloud Services Rely on Coal or Nuclear Power, Report Says, New York Times
  116. ^ Google to enter clean-energy business CNET News, November 2007
  117. ^ Google's Next Frontier: Renewable Energy New York Times, November 2007
  118. ^ Neate, Rupert May 5, 2010 "Google blows $39m into wind power" The Daily Telegraph London Retrieved May 25, 2010 
  119. ^ "Activists Accuse Tech Community of Throwing San Francisco Under the Bus", David Streitfeld, New York Times, January 21, 2014 Retrieved March 22, 2014
  120. ^ Gumbel, Andrew January 25, 2014 "San Francisco's guerrilla protest at Google buses swells into revolt" The Guardian Retrieved August 31, 2014 
  121. ^ "Is Google DRM crippling culture as great as it seems", Ashlee Vance, The Register, January 8, 2006
  122. ^ "Google Video robs customers of the videos they "own"", Cory Doctorow, boingboing, August 10, 2007
  123. ^ "Google Pulls Plug, Everyone Misses Point", John C Dvorak, PC Magazine online, August 14, 2007
  124. ^ Nick Stamoulis March 24, 2008 "Why Companies Are Upset With Google's Search-Within-Search" SEO Blog Search Engine Optimization Journal 
  125. ^ a b Tedeschi, Bob March 24, 2008 "A New Tool From Google Alarms Sites" New York Times 
  126. ^ Regan, Keith March 24, 2008 "Google's Search-Within-Search Draws Scutiny" E-Commerce Times 
  127. ^ Francis McCabe fmccabe November 10, 2009 "Issue 9 – go -I have already used the name for MY programming language" 
  128. ^ Thomas Claburn November 11, 2009 "Google 'Go' Name Brings Accusations Of 'Evil'" InformationWeek 
  129. ^ John Brownlee November 13, 2009 "Google didn't google "Go" before naming their programming language" geekcom 
  130. ^ "Fury as Google puts the SAS's secret base on Street View in 'very serious security breach'" Daily Mail London March 19, 2010 
  131. ^ Eric Ogren March 7, 2008 "Google Caves To Pentagon Wishes" Information Week 
  132. ^ Bill de Blasio August 5, 2010 "Make Google Disclose" Office of the New York City Public Advocate Retrieved October 3, 2013 
  133. ^ Orlowski, Andrew "Why DOES Google lobby so much" The Register, July 23, 2012
  134. ^ "Anatomy of a Washington dinner: Who funds the Competitive Enterprise Institute", Juliet Eilperin, Washington Post, June 20, 2013 Retrieved March 22, 2014
  135. ^ Solomon, Norman October 10, 2013 "Google: Doing Evil with ALEC" Daily Kos Retrieved November 8, 2013 
  136. ^ Swanson, David December 6, 2013 "Funding ALEC – I Googled "Evil" And It Took Me to Google" Counterpunchorg Retrieved December 6, 2013 
  137. ^ Surgey, Nick December 6, 2013 "Google Moves Right By Funding ALEC & Heritage Action" The Real News Network Retrieved December 6, 2013 
  138. ^ Brad Johnson September 23, 2014 "Google Drops American Legislative Exchange Council Over Climate Denial: 'They're Literally Lying'" Hill Heat 
  139. ^ Dayen, David "Google's unusually close relationship with the White House raises lots of questions" Mashable Retrieved 2016-05-03 
  140. ^ "Google's Remarkably Close Relationship With the Obama White House, in Two Charts" The Intercept Retrieved 2016-05-10 
  141. ^ a b Tamburro, Paul February 17, 2016 "Prominent YouTubers Ask "Where's the Fair Use" in Backlash Against Site" Crave Online Retrieved February 17, 2016 
  142. ^ Murrell, Dan February 16, 2016 "Dan Murrell on Twitter" Twitter Retrieved February 19, 2016 
  143. ^ "Time's Person of the Year: You", Time, December 13, 2006
  144. ^ Paul Owen "Our top 10 funniest YouTube comments – what are yours" the Guardian Retrieved February 12, 2015 
  145. ^ "YouTube's worst comments blocked by filter", Daily Telegraph, September 2, 2008
  146. ^ Rundle, Michael April 7, 2012 "Policing Racism Online: Liam Stacey, YouTube And The Law Of Big Numbers" The Huffington Post Retrieved June 1, 2012 
  147. ^ Stuart Dredge November 7, 2013 "YouTube aims to tame the trolls with changes to its comments section" The Guardian Retrieved November 16, 2013 
  148. ^ Alex Hern November 8, 2013 "YouTube co-founder hurls abuse at Google over new YouTube comments" The Guardian Retrieved November 16, 2013 
  149. ^ YouTube Help November 6, 2013 "Meet the new YouTube comments" Video upload YouTube Google Inc Retrieved November 16, 2013 
  150. ^ "YouTube Founder Blasts New YouTube Comments: Jawed Karim Outraged At Google Plus Requirement", Ryan W Neal, International Business Times, November 8, 2013 Retrieved November 9, 2013
  151. ^ a b Chase, Melvin November 20, 2013 "YouTube comments require Google+ account, Google faces uproar" Newsday  subscription required Alternate link Archived December 3, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  152. ^ "Google joins Facebook in trying to prevent IAMAI from taking strong anti-Zero Rating stand" MediaNama August 20, 2015 
  153. ^ Hern, Alex April 1, 2016 "Google disables April fool joke amid user fury after prank backfires" – via The Guardian 

External links

  • "Pakistan v/s Google Products" Blogspot Down in Pakistan
  • "Google's Email Service 'Gmail' Sacrifices Privacy for Extra Storage Space", Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, April 2, 2004
  • "Privacy Group Flunks Google", Lisa Vaas, eWeekcom, June 12, 2007
  • "Who's afraid of Google", The Economist, August 30, 2007
  • "10 reasons to turn Google Buzz off", Mushon Zer-Aviv, Mushoncom, February 17, 2010
  • "Googlist Realism: The Google-China saga and the free-information regimes as a new site of cultural imperialism and moral tensions", Tricia Wang, Cultural Bytes, June 29, 2010
  • "How to Remove Your Google Search History Before Google's New Privacy Policy Takes Effect", Eva Galperin, Electronic Frontier Foundation, February 21, 2012
  • "Google faces a 3 billion euro antitrust fine", Google faces a 3 billion euro antitrust fine

analysis of google, analysis of google case study, analysis of google hr strategy, analysis of google logo, criticism of google, criticism of google chrome

Criticism of Google Information about

Criticism of Google

  • user icon

    Criticism of Google beatiful post thanks!


Criticism of Google
Criticism of Google
Criticism of Google viewing the topic.
Criticism of Google what, Criticism of Google who, Criticism of Google explanation

There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video

Random Posts



The Picts were a tribal confederation of peoples who lived in what is today eastern and northern Sco...
Visual prosthesis

Visual prosthesis

A visual prosthesis, often referred to as a bionic eye, is an experimental visual device intended to...
Mini rugby

Mini rugby

Mini rugby, also known as New Image Rugby, is a form of rugby union designed to introduce the sport ...
List of synthetic polymers

List of synthetic polymers

Synthetic polymers are human-made polymers From the utility point of view they can be classified int...