Tue . 20 May 2020
TR | RU | UK | KK | BE |

Creative Commons license

creative commons license, creative commons license images
A Creative Commons CC license is one of several public copyright licenses that enable the free distribution of an otherwise copyrighted work A CC license is used when an author wants to give people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that they have created CC provides an author flexibility for example, they might choose to allow only non-commercial uses of their own work and protects the people who use or redistribute an author's work from concerns of copyright infringement as long as they abide by the conditions that are specified in the license by which the author distributes the work

CC licensed music is available through several outlets such as SoundCloud, and is available for use in video and music remixing

There are several types of CC licenses The licenses differ by several combinations that condition the terms of distribution They were initially released on December 16, 2002 by Creative Commons, a US non-profit corporation founded in 2001 There have also been five versions of the suite of licenses, numbered 10 through 40 As of 2016, the 40 license suite is the most current

In October 2014 the Open Knowledge Foundation approved the Creative Commons CC BY, CC BY-SA, and CC0 licenses as conformant with the "Open Definition" for content and data


  • 1 Applicable works
  • 2 Types of licenses
    • 21 Seven regularly used licenses
  • 3 Version 40 and international use
  • 4 Rights
    • 41 Attribution
    • 42 Non-commercial licenses
    • 43 Zero / public domain
    • 44 Adaptation
  • 5 Legal aspects
    • 51 Dutch tabloid
    • 52 Virgin Mobile
    • 53 SGAE vs Fernández
    • 54 GateHouse Media, Inc vs That's Great News, LLC
    • 55 Drauglis v Kappa Map Group, LLC
    • 56 Verband zum Schutz geistigen Eigentums im Internet VGSE
  • 6 Works with a Creative Commons license
  • 7 Retired licenses
  • 8 See also
  • 9 References
  • 10 External links

Applicable works

Work licensed under a Creative Commons license is governed by applicable copyright law This allows Creative Commons licenses to be applied to all work falling under copyright, including: books, plays, movies, music, articles, photographs, blogs, and websites Creative Commons does not recommend the use of Creative Commons licenses for software

There are over 35,000 works that are available in hardcopy and have a registered ISBN number Creative Commons splits these works into two categories, one of which encompasses self-published books

However, application of a Creative Commons license may not modify the rights allowed by fair use or fair dealing or exert restrictions which violate copyright exceptions Furthermore, Creative Commons licenses are non-exclusive and non-revocable Any work or copies of the work obtained under a Creative Commons license may continue to be used under that license

In the case of works protected by multiple Creative Common licenses, the user may choose either

Types of licenses

Play media Wanna Work Together animation by Creative Commons Play media The second version of the Mayer and Bettle promotional animation explains what Creative Commons is Creative commons license spectrum between public domain top and all rights reserved bottom Left side indicates the use-cases allowed, right side the license components The dark green area indicates Free Cultural Works compatible licenses, the two green areas compatibility with the Remix culture CC license usage in 2014 top and middle, "Free cultural works" compatible license usage 2010 to 2014 bottom

The CC licenses all grant the "baseline rights", such as the right to distribute the copyrighted work worldwide for non-commercial purposes, and without modification The details of each of these licenses depend on the version, and comprises a selection out of four conditions:

Icon Right Description
Attribution BY Licensees may copy, distribute, display and perform the work and make derivative works and remixes based on it only if they give the author or licensor the credits attribution in the manner specified by these
Share-alike SA Licensees may distribute derivative works only under a license identical "not more restrictive" to the license that governs the original work See also copyleft Without share-alike, derivative works might be sublicensed with compatible but more restrictive license clauses, eg CC BY to CC BY-NC
Non-commercial NC Licensees may copy, distribute, display, and perform the work and make derivative works and remixes based on it only for non-commercial purposes
No Derivative Works ND Licensees may copy, distribute, display and perform only verbatim copies of the work, not derivative works and remixes based on it

The last two clauses are not free content licenses, according to definitions such as DFSG or the Free Software Foundation's standards, and cannot be used in contexts that require these freedoms, such as Wikipedia For software, Creative Commons includes three free licenses created by other institutions: the BSD License, the GNU LGPL, and the GNU GPL

Mixing and matching these conditions produces sixteen possible combinations, of which eleven are valid Creative Commons licenses and five are not Of the five invalid combinations, four include both the "nd" and "sa" clauses, which are mutually exclusive; and one includes none of the clauses Of the eleven valid combinations, the five that lack the "by" clause have been retired because 98% of licensors requested attribution, though they do remain available for reference on the website This leaves six regularly used licenses + the CC0 public domain waiver:

Seven regularly used licenses

Icon Description Acronym Free Cultural Works Remix culture Commercial use
Freeing content globally without restrictions CC0 Yes Yes Yes
Attribution alone BY Yes Yes Yes
Attribution + ShareAlike BY-SA Yes Yes Yes
Attribution + Noncommercial BY-NC No Yes No
Attribution + NoDerivatives BY-ND No No Yes
Attribution + Noncommercial + ShareAlike BY-NC-SA No Yes No
Attribution + Noncommercial + NoDerivatives BY-NC-ND No No No

For example, the Creative Commons Attribution BY license allows one to share and remix create derivative works, even for commercial use, so long as attribution is given

Version 40 and international use

Main article: Creative Commons jurisdiction ports

The original non-localized Creative Commons licenses were written with the US legal system in mind, therefore the wording may be incompatible with local legislation in other jurisdictions, rendering the licenses unenforceable there To address this issue, Creative Commons asked its affiliates to translate the various licenses to reflect local laws in a process called "porting" As of July 2011, Creative Commons licenses have been ported to over 50 jurisdictions worldwide

The latest version 40 of the Creative Commons licenses, released on November 25, 2013, are generic licenses that are applicable to most jurisdictions and do not usually require ports No new ports have been implemented in version 40 of the license Version 40 discourages using ported versions and instead acts as a single global license



Since 2004, all current licenses beside the CC0 waiver require attribution of the original author, the BY component The attribution must be given to "the best of ability using the information available" Generally this implies the following:

  • Include any copyright notices if applicable If the work itself contains any copyright notices placed there by the copyright holder, those notices must be left intact, or reproduced in a way that is reasonable to the medium in which the work is being re-published
  • Cite the author's name, screen name, or user ID, etc If the work is being published on the Internet, it is nice to link that name to the person's profile page, if such a page exists
  • Cite the work's title or name if applicable, if such a thing exists If the work is being published on the Internet, it is nice to link the name or title directly to the original work
  • Cite the specific CC license the work is under If the work is being published on the Internet, it is nice if the license citation links to the license on the CC website
  • Mention if the work is a derivative work or adaptation In addition to the above, one needs to identify that their work is a derivative work, eg, "This is a Finnish translation of by " or "Screenplay based on by "

Non-commercial licenses

Further information: Creative Commons § Criticism of the non-commercial license

The "non-commercial" option included in some Creative Commons licenses is controversial in definition, as it is sometimes unclear what can be considered a non-commercial setting, and application, since its restrictions differ from the principles of open content promoted by other permissive licenses In 2014 Wikimedia published a guide to using Creative Commons licences as wiki pages for translations and as PDF

Zero / public domain

CC zero waiver/license logo Creative Commons Public Domain Mark Indicates works which have already fallen or were given into PD

Besides licenses, Creative Commons also offers a way to release material worldwide into the public domain through CC0, a legal tool for waiving as many rights as legally possible Development of CC0 began in 2007 and the tool was released in 2009 A major target of the license was the scientific data community

In 2010, Creative Commons announced its Public Domain Mark, a tool for labeling works already in the public domain Together, CC0 and the Public Domain Mark replace the Public Domain Dedication and Certification, which took a US-centric approach and co-mingled distinct operations

In 2011, the Free Software Foundation added CC0 to its free software licenses, and currently recommends CC0 as the preferred method of releasing software into the public domain

In February 2012 CC0 was submitted to Open Source Initiative OSI for their approval However, controversy arose over its clause which excluded from the scope of the license any relevant patents held by the copyright holder This clause was added with scientific data in mind rather than software, but some members of the OSI believed it could weaken users' defenses against software patents As a result, Creative Commons withdrew their submission, and the license is not currently approved by the OSI

In 2013, Unsplash began using the CC0 license to distribute free stock photography It now distributes several million photos a month and has inspired a host of similar sites, including CC0 photography companies and CC0 blogging companies Lawrence Lessig, the founder of Creative Commons, has contributed to the site

In October 2014 the Open Knowledge Foundation approved the Creative Commons CC0 as conformant with the "Open Definition" and recommend the license to dedicate content to the public domain


A license compatibility chart for combining or mixing two CC licensed works

Rights in an adaptation can be expressed by a CC license that is compatible with the status or licensing of the original work or works on which the adaptation is based

Legal aspects

The legal implications of large numbers of works having Creative Commons licensing is difficult to predict, and there is speculation that media creators often lack insight to be able to choose the license which best meets their intent in applying it

Some works licensed using Creative Commons licenses have been involved in several court cases Creative Commons itself was not a party to any of these cases; they only involved licensors or licensees of Creative Commons licenses When the cases went as far as decisions by judges that is, they were not dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or were not settled privately out of court, they have all validated the legal robustness of Creative Commons public licenses Here are some notable cases:

Dutch tabloid

In early 2006, podcaster Adam Curry sued a Dutch tabloid who published photos from Curry's Flickr page without Curry's permission The photos were licensed under the Creative Commons Non-Commercial license While the verdict was in favor of Curry, the tabloid avoided having to pay restitution to him as long as they did not repeat the offense Professor Bernt Hugenholtz, main creator of the Dutch CC license and director of the Institute for Information Law of the University of Amsterdam, commented, "The Dutch Court's decision is especially noteworthy because it confirms that the conditions of a Creative Commons license automatically apply to the content licensed under it, and binds users of such content even without expressly agreeing to, or having knowledge of, the conditions of the license"

Virgin Mobile

In 2007, Virgin Mobile Australia launched an Australian bus stop ad campaign promoting their cellphone text messaging service using the work of amateur photographers who uploaded their work to Flickr using a Creative Commons-BY Attribution license Users licensing their images this way freed their work for use by any other entity, as long as the original creator was attributed credit, without any other compensation required Virgin upheld this single restriction by printing a URL leading to the photographer's Flickr page on each of their ads However, one picture, depicting 15-year-old Alison Chang at a fund-raising carwash for her church, caused some controversy when she sued Virgin Mobile The photo was taken by Alison's church youth counselor, Justin Ho-Wee Wong, who uploaded the image to Flickr under the Creative Commons license In 2008, the case concerning personality rights rather than copyright as such was thrown out of a Texas court for lack of jurisdiction

SGAE vs Fernández

In the fall of 2006, the collecting society Sociedad General de Autores y Editores SGAE in Spain sued Ricardo Andrés Utrera Fernández, owner of a disco bar located in Badajoz who played CC-licensed music SGAE argued that Fernández should pay royalties for public performance of the music between November 2002 and August 2005 The Lower Court rejected the collecting society's claims because the owner of the bar proved that the music he was using was not managed by the society

In February 2006, the Cultural Association Ladinamo based in Madrid, and represented by Javier de la Cueva was granted the use of copyleft music in their public activities The sentence said: "Admitting the existence of music equipment, a joint evaluation of the evidence practiced this court is convinced that the defendant prevents communication of works whose management is entrusted to the plaintiff , using a repertoire of authors who have not assigned the exploitation of their rights to the SGAE, having at its disposal a database for that purpose and so it is manifested both by the legal representative of the Association and by Manuela Villa Acosta, in charge of the cultural programming of the association, which is compatible with the alternative character of the Association and its integration in the movement called 'copy left'"

GateHouse Media, Inc vs That's Great News, LLC

On June 30, 2010 GateHouse Media filed a lawsuit against That's Great News GateHouse Media owns a number of local newspapers, including Rockford Register Star, which is based in Rockford, Illinois That's Great News makes plaques out of newspaper articles and sells them to the people featured in the articles GateHouse sued That's Great News for copyright infringement and breach of contract GateHouse claimed that TGN violated the non-commercial and no-derivative works restrictions on GateHouse Creative Commons licensed work when TGN published the material on its website The case was settled on August 17, 2010, though the settlement was not made public

Drauglis v Kappa Map Group, LLC

The plaintiff was photographer Art Drauglis, who uploaded several pictures to the photo-sharing website Flickr using Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 20 Generic License CC BY-SA, including one entitled "Swain's Lock, Montgomery Co, MD" The defendant was Kappa Map Group, a map-making company, which downloaded the image and used it in a compilation entitled "Montgomery Co Maryland Street Atlas" Though there was nothing on the cover that indicated the origin of the picture, the text "Photo: Swain's Lock, Montgomery Co, MD Photographer: Carly Lesser & Art Drauglis, Creative Commoms , CC-BY-SA-20" appeared at the bottom of the back cover

The validity of the CC BY-SA 20 as a license was not in dispute The CC BY-SA 20 requires that the licensee to use nothing less restrictive than the CC BY-SA 20 terms The atlas was sold commercially and not for free reuse by others The dispute was whether Drauglis' license terms that would apply to "derivative works" applied to the entire atlas Drauglis sued the defendants on June 2014 for copyright infringement and license breach, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, damages, fees, and costs Drauglis asserted, among other things, that Kappa Map Group "exceeded the scope of the License because defendant did not publish the Atlas under a license with the same or similar terms as those under which the Photograph was originally licensed" The judge dismissed the case on that count, ruling that the atlas was not a derivative work of the photograph in the sense of the license Since the atlas was not a derivative work of the photograph, Kappa Map Group did not need to license the entire atlas under the CC BY-SA 20 license The judge also determined that the work had been properly attributed

Verband zum Schutz geistigen Eigentums im Internet VGSE

This incident has not been tested in court, but it highlights a potentially disturbing practice In July 2016, German computer magazine LinuxUser reports that a German blogger Christoph Langner used two CC-BY licensed photographs from Berlin photographer Dennis Skley on his private blog Linuxundichde Langner duly mentioned the author and the license and added a link to the original Langner was later contacted by the Verband zum Schutz geistigen Eigentums im Internet VGSE Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property in the Internet with a demand for €2300 for failing to provide the full name of the work, the full name of the author, the license text, and a source link, as is apparently required by the fine print in the license Of this sum, €40 goes to the photographer and remainder is retained by VGSE

Works with a Creative Commons license

Number of Creative Commons licensed works as of 2014, per State of the Commons report Main article: List of works available under a Creative Commons license See also: Category:Creative Commons-licensed works

Creative Commons maintains a content directory wiki of organizations and projects using Creative Commons licenses On its website CC also provides case studies of projects using CC licenses across the world CC licensed content can also be accessed through a number of content directories and search engines see CC licensed content directories

Retired licenses

Due to either disuse or criticism, a number of previously offered Creative Commons licenses have since been retired, and are no longer recommended for new works The retired licenses include all licenses lacking the Attribution element other than CC0, as well as the following four licenses:

  • Developing Nations License: a license which only applies to developing countries deemed to be "non-high-income economies" by the World Bank Full copyright restrictions apply to people in other countries
  • Sampling: parts of the work can be used for any purpose other than advertising, but the whole work cannot be copied or modified
  • Sampling Plus: parts of the work can be copied and modified for any purpose other than advertising, and the entire work can be copied for noncommercial purposes
  • NonCommercial Sampling Plus: the whole work or parts of the work can be copied and modified for non-commercial purposes

See also

  • Free software portal
  • Free culture movement
  • Free music
  • Free software
  • Non-commercial educational


  1. ^ https://wikicreativecommonsorg/wiki/License_Versions
  2. ^ Open Definition 21 on opendefinitionorg
  3. ^ a b licenses on opendefinitioncom
  4. ^ a b Creative Commons 40 BY and BY-SA licenses approved conformant with the Open Definition by Timothy Vollmer on creativecommonsorg December 27th, 2013
  5. ^ "Creative Commons Legal Code" Creative Commons January 9, 2008 Retrieved February 22, 2010 
  6. ^ "Creative Commons FAQ: Can I use a Creative Commons license for software" Wikicreativecommonsorg July 29, 2013 Retrieved September 20, 2013 
  7. ^ "Books - Creative Commons" wikicreativecommonsorg Retrieved 2016-04-01 
  8. ^ "Do Creative Commons licenses affect exceptions and limitations to copyright, such as fair dealing and fair use" Frequently Asked Questions - Creative Commons Retrieved July 26, 2015 
  9. ^ "What if I change my mind about using a CC license" Frequently Asked Questions - Creative Commons Retrieved July 26, 2015 
  10. ^ "What happens if the author decides to revoke the CC license to material I am using" Frequently Asked Questions - Creative Commons Retrieved July 26, 2015 
  11. ^ "How do CC licenses operate" Frequently Asked Questions - Creative Commons Retrieved July 26, 2015 
  12. ^ "Baseline Rights" Creative Commons June 12, 2008 Retrieved February 22, 2010 
  13. ^ "What are Creative Commons licenses" Frequently Asked Questions - Creative Commons Retrieved July 26, 2015 
  14. ^ "Creative Commons GNU LGPL" Archived from the original on June 22, 2009 Retrieved July 20, 2009 
  15. ^ a b "Retired Legal Tools" Creative Commons Retrieved May 31, 2012 
  16. ^ a b "Announcing and explaining our new 20 licenses" Creativecommonsorg May 25, 2004 Retrieved September 20, 2013 
  17. ^ a b "About The Licenses - Creative Commons" Creative Commons Retrieved July 26, 2015 
  18. ^ a b "CC0" Creative Commons Retrieved February 22, 2010 
  19. ^ "Creative Commons — Attribution 30 United States" Creative Commons November 16, 2009 Retrieved February 22, 2010 
  20. ^ Murray, Laura 2014 Putting intellectual property in its place: rights discourses, creative labor, and the everyday Oxford: Oxford University Press p 25 ISBN 0-19-933626-1 
  21. ^ "Worldwide" Creative Commons Archived from the original on December 21, 2009 
  22. ^ Peters, Diane November 25, 2013 "CC's Next Generation Licenses — Welcome Version 40!" Creative Commons Retrieved November 26, 2013 
  23. ^ "What's new in 40" Creative Commons 2013 Retrieved November 26, 2013 
  24. ^ "CC 40, an end to porting Creative Commons licences" TechnoLlama September 25, 2011 Retrieved August 11, 2013 
  25. ^ Doug Whitfield August 5, 2013 "Music Manumit Lawcast with Jessica Coates of Creative Commons" YouTube Retrieved August 11, 2013 
  26. ^ "CC Affiliate Network" Creative Commons Retrieved July 8, 2011 
  27. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions: What if CC licenses have not been ported to my jurisdiction" Creative Commons Retrieved November 26, 2013 
  28. ^ "Frequently Frequently Asked Questions" Creative Commons February 2, 2010 Retrieved February 22, 2010 
  29. ^ "Defining Noncommercial report published" Creativecommonsorg Retrieved September 20, 2013 
  30. ^ "The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License" Freedomdefinedorg August 26, 2013 Retrieved September 20, 2013 
  31. ^ Till Kreutzer 2014 Open Content – A Practical Guide to Using Creative Commons Licenses PDF Wikimedia Deutschland ea ISBN 978-3-940785-57-2 Retrieved March 23, 2015 
  32. ^ "Downloads" Creative Commons 2015-12-16 Retrieved 2015-12-24 
  33. ^ Validity of the Creative Commons Zero 10 Universal Public Domain Dedication and its usability for bibliographic metadata from the perspective of German Copyright Law by Dr Till Kreutzer, attorney-at-law in Berlin, Germany
  34. ^ "Creative Commons Launches CC0 and CC+ Programs" Press release Creative Commons December 17, 2007 Retrieved February 22, 2010 
  35. ^ Baker, Gavin January 16, 2009 "Report from CC board meeting" Open Access News Retrieved February 22, 2010 
  36. ^ "Expanding the Public Domain: Part Zero" Creativecommonsorg Retrieved September 20, 2013 
  37. ^ a b Christopher Allan Webber "CC withdrawl of CC0 from OSI process" In the Open Source Initiative Licence review mailing list Retrieved February 24, 2012 
  38. ^ "Marking and Tagging the Public Domain: An Invitation to Comment" Creativecommonsorg August 10, 2010 Retrieved September 20, 2013 
  39. ^ "Copyright-Only Dedication based on United States law or Public Domain Certification" Creative Commons August 20, 2009 Retrieved February 22, 2010 
  40. ^ "Using CC0 for public domain software" Creative Commons April 15, 2011 Retrieved May 10, 2011 
  41. ^ "Various Licenses and Comments about Them" GNU Project Retrieved April 4, 2015 
  42. ^ Carl Boettiger "OSI recognition for Creative Commons Zero License" In the Open Source Initiative Licence review mailing list opensourceorg Retrieved February 1, 2012 
  43. ^ The Open Source Initiative FAQ "What about the Creative Commons "CC0" "CC Zero" public domain dedication Is that Open Source" opensourceorg Retrieved May 25, 2013 
  44. ^ "Unsplash is a site full of free images for your next splash page" The Next Web Retrieved 2015-11-13 
  45. ^ "License | Unsplash" unsplashcom Retrieved 2015-11-13 
  46. ^ "Why Building Something Useful For Others Is The Best Marketing There Is" Fast Company Retrieved 2015-11-13 
  47. ^ "Blogstock is building the Shutterstock or Unsplash of written content - Startup Daily" Startup Daily Retrieved 2015-11-13 
  48. ^ "Lawrence Lessig | Unsplash Book" bookunsplashcom Retrieved 2015-11-13 
  49. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions" CC Wiki Retrieved March 25, 2014 
  50. ^ Katz, Zachary 2005 "Pitfalls of Open Licensing: An Analysis of Creative Commons Licensing" IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review 46 3: 391 
  51. ^ "Creative Commons Case Law" Retrieved August 31, 2011 
  52. ^ "Creative Commons license upheld by court" Newscnetcom Retrieved December 24, 2012 
  53. ^ Digital Copyright and the Consumer Revolution: Hands Off My Ipod - Matthew Rimmer - Google Böcker Booksgooglese Retrieved December 24, 2012 
  54. ^ "Creative Commons License Upheld by Dutch Court" Groklaw March 16, 2006 Retrieved September 2, 2006 
  55. ^ "Creative Commons Licenses Enforced in Dutch Court" Retrieved August 31, 2011 
  56. ^ a b Cohen, Noam "Use My Photo Not Without Permission" New York Times Retrieved September 25, 2007 One moment, Alison Chang, a 15-year-old student from Dallas, is cheerfully goofing around at a local church-sponsored car wash, posing with a friend for a photo Weeks later, that photo is posted online and catches the eye of an ad agency in Australia, and the altered image of Alison appears on a billboard in Adelaide as part of a Virgin Mobile advertising campaign 
  57. ^ Evan Brown January 22, 2009 "No personal jurisdiction over Australian defendant in Flickr right of publicity case" Internet Cases, a blog about law and technology Archived from the original on July 13, 2011 Retrieved September 25, 2010 
  58. ^ "Lawsuit Against Virgin Mobile and Creative Commons – FAQ" Retrieved August 31, 2011 
  59. ^ Mia Garlick March 23, 2006 "Spanish Court Recognizes CC-Music" Creative Commons Retrieved September 25, 2010 
  60. ^ "Sentencia nº 12/2006 Juzgado de lo Mercantil nº 5 de Madrid | Derecho de Internet" in Spanish Derecho-internetorg Retrieved 2015-12-24 
  61. ^ CMLP Staff August 5, 2010 "GateHouse Media v That's Great News" Citizen Media Law Project Retrieved April 20, 2012 
  62. ^ "Memorandum Opinion" PDF United States District Court for the District of Columbia August 18, 2015 Retrieved August 29, 2016 
  63. ^ Guadamuz, Andres "US Court interprets copyleft clause in Creative Commons licenses" TechnoLlama Retrieved 10 December 2015 
  64. ^ Luther, Jörg July 2016 "Kleingedrucktes — Editorial" LinuxUser in German 07/2016 ISSN 1615-4444 Retrieved 2016-09-09 
  65. ^ See also: "Abmahnung des Verbandes zum Schutz geistigen Eigentums im Internet VSGE" in German Hannover, Germany: Feil Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft 8 January 2014 Retrieved 2016-09-09 
  66. ^ "Content Directories" creativecommonsorg Retrieved April 24, 2009 
  67. ^ "Case Studies" Creative Commons Retrieved December 20, 2011 
  68. ^ Lessig, Lawrence June 4, 2007 "Retiring standalone DevNations and one Sampling license" Creative Commons Retrieved July 5, 2007 
  69. ^ "Developing Nations License" Creative Commons Retrieved April 9, 2012 
  70. ^ "Sampling 10" Creative Commons Retrieved April 9, 2012 
  71. ^ "Sampling Plus 10" Creative Commons November 13, 2009 Retrieved April 9, 2012 
  72. ^ "NonCommercial Sampling Plus 10" Creative Commons November 13, 2009 Retrieved April 9, 2012 

External links

  • Official website
  • Full selection of licenses
  • Licenses Overview of free licenses freedomdefinedorg

creative commons license, creative commons license attribution, creative commons license elements, creative commons license examples, creative commons license generator, creative commons license images, creative commons license meaning, creative commons license music, creative commons license types, creative commons license youtube

Creative Commons license Information about

Creative Commons license

  • user icon

    Creative Commons license beatiful post thanks!


Creative Commons license
Creative Commons license
Creative Commons license viewing the topic.
Creative Commons license what, Creative Commons license who, Creative Commons license explanation

There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video

Random Posts

Modern philosophy

Modern philosophy

Modern philosophy is a branch of philosophy that originated in Western Europe in the 17th century, a...
Tim Shadbolt

Tim Shadbolt

Timothy Richard "Tim" Shadbolt born 19 February 1947 is a New Zealand politician He is the Mayor of ...
HK Express

HK Express

Andrew Cowen Deputy CEO Website wwwhkexpresscom HK Express Traditional Chinese 香港快運航空...
List of shrinking cities in the United States

List of shrinking cities in the United States

The following municipalities in the United States have lost at least 20% of their population, from a...