Sun . 20 Jan 2020
TR | RU | UK | KK | BE |

Collective intelligence

collective intelligence, collective intelligence crossword
Collective intelligence CI is shared or group intelligence that emerges from the collaboration, collective efforts, and competition of many individuals and appears in consensus decision making The term appears in sociobiology, political science and in context of mass peer review and crowdsourcing applications It may involve consensus, social capital and formalisms such as voting systems, social media and other means of quantifying mass activity Collective IQ is a measure of collective intelligence, although it is often used interchangeably with the term collective intelligence Collective intelligence has also been attributed to bacteria:63 and animals:69

It can be understood as an emergent property from the synergies among: 1 data-information-knowledge; 2 software-hardware; and 3 experts those with new insights as well as recognized authorities that continually learns from feedback to produce just-in-time knowledge for better decisions than these three elements acting alone Or more narrowly as an emergent property between people and ways of processing information This notion of collective intelligence is referred to as "symbiotic intelligence" by Norman Lee Johnson The concept is used in sociology, business, computer science and mass communications: it also appears in science fiction Pierre Lévy defines collective intelligence as, "It is a form of universally distributed intelligence, constantly enhanced, coordinated in real time, and resulting in the effective mobilization of skills I'll add the following indispensable characteristic to this definition: The basis and goal of collective intelligence is mutual recognition and enrichment of individuals rather than the cult of fetishized or hypostatized communities" According to researchers Pierre Lévy and Derrick de Kerckhove, it refers to capacity of networked ICTs Information communication technologies to enhance the collective pool of social knowledge by simultaneously expanding the extent of human interactions

Collective intelligence strongly contributes to the shift of knowledge and power from the individual to the collective According to Eric S Raymond 1998 and JC Herz 2005, open source intelligence will eventually generate superior outcomes to knowledge generated by proprietary software developed within corporations Flew 2008 Media theorist Henry Jenkins sees collective intelligence as an 'alternative source of media power', related to convergence culture He draws attention to education and the way people are learning to participate in knowledge cultures outside formal learning settings Henry Jenkins criticizes schools which promote 'autonomous problem solvers and self-contained learners' while remaining hostile to learning through the means of collective intelligence Both Pierre Lévy 2007 and Henry Jenkins 2008 support the claim that collective intelligence is important for democratization, as it is interlinked with knowledge-based culture and sustained by collective idea sharing, and thus contributes to a better understanding of diverse society

Similar to the g factor g for general individual intelligence, a new scientific understanding of collective intelligence aims to extract a general collective intelligence factor c factor for groups indicating a group's ability to perform a wide range of tasks Definition, operationalization and statistical methods are derived from g Similarly as g is highly interrelated with the concept of IQ, this measurement of collective intelligence can be interpreted as intelligence quotient for groups Group-IQ even though the score is not a quotient per se Causes for c and predictive validity are investigated as well

Writers who have influenced the idea of collective intelligence include Douglas Hofstadter 1979, Peter Russell 1983, Tom Atlee 1993, Pierre Lévy 1994, Howard Bloom 1995, Francis Heylighen 1995, Douglas Engelbart, Cliff Joslyn, Ron Dembo, Gottfried Mayer-Kress 2003


  • 1 History
  • 2 Dimensions
  • 3 Collective intelligence factor c
    • 31 Causes
    • 32 Processes
      • 321 Top-down processes
      • 322 Bottom-up processes
    • 33 Evidence
    • 34 Predictive validity
    • 35 Potential connections to individual intelligence
    • 36 Controversies
  • 4 Alternative mathematical techniques
    • 41 Computational collective intelligence
    • 42 Collective intelligence quotient
  • 5 Applications
    • 51 Cognition
      • 511 Market judgment
      • 512 Predictions in politics and technology
    • 52 Cooperation
      • 521 Networks of trust
      • 522 P2P business
      • 523 Open source software
    • 53 Coordination
      • 531 Ad-hoc communities
      • 532 Coordinating collective actions
  • 6 Alternative views
    • 61 A tool for combating self-preservation
    • 62 Separation from IQism
    • 63 Artificial intelligence views
  • 7 See also
    • 71 Similar concepts and applications
    • 72 Computation and computer science
    • 73 Others
  • 8 Notes and references
  • 9 Bibliography
  • 10 External links


HG Wells World Brain 1936-1938

The concept although not so named originated in 1785 with the Marquis de Condorcet, whose "jury theorem" states that if each member of a voting group is more likely than not to make a correct decision, the probability that the highest vote of the group is the correct decision increases with the number of members of the group see Condorcet's jury theorem Many theorists have interpreted Aristotle's statement in the Politics that "a feast to which many contribute is better than a dinner provided out of a single purse" to mean that just as many may bring different dishes to the table, so in a deliberation many may contribute different pieces of information to generate a better decision Recent scholarship, however, suggests that this was probably not what Aristotle meant but is a modern interpretation based on what we now know about team intelligence

A precursor of the concept is found in entomologist William Morton Wheeler's observation that seemingly independent individuals can cooperate so closely as to become indistinguishable from a single organism 1911 Wheeler saw this collaborative process at work in ants that acted like the cells of a single beast he called a superorganism

In 1912 Émile Durkheim identified society as the sole source of human logical thought He argued, in "The Elementary Forms of Religious Life" that society constitutes a higher intelligence because it transcends the individual over space and time Other antecedents are Vladimir Vernadsky's concept of "noosphere" and HG Wells's concept of "world brain" see also the term "global brain" Peter Russell, Elisabet Sahtouris, and Barbara Marx Hubbard originator of the term "conscious evolution" are inspired by the visions of a noosphere – a transcendent, rapidly evolving collective intelligence – an informational cortex of the planet The notion has more recently been examined by the philosopher Pierre Lévy In a 1962 research report, Douglas Engelbart linked collective intelligence to organizational effectiveness, and predicted that pro-actively 'augmenting human intellect' would yield a multiplier effect in group problem solving: "Three people working together in this augmented mode seem to be more than three times as effective in solving a complex problem as is one augmented person working alone" In 1994, he coined the term 'collective IQ' as a measure of collective intelligence, to focus attention on the opportunity to significantly raise collective IQ in business and society

The idea of collective intelligence also forms the framework for contemporary democratic theories often referred to as epistemic democracy Epistemic democratic theories refer to the capacity of the populace, either through deliberation or aggregation of knowledge, to track the truth and relies on mechanisms to synthesize and apply collective intelligence


Complex adaptive systems model

Howard Bloom has discussed mass behavior – collective behavior from the level of quarks to the level of bacterial, plant, animal, and human societies He stresses the biological adaptations that have turned most of this earth's living beings into components of what he calls "a learning machine" In 1986 Bloom combined the concepts of apoptosis, parallel distributed processing, group selection, and the superorganism to produce a theory of how collective intelligence works Later he showed how the collective intelligences of competing bacterial colonies and human societies can be explained in terms of computer-generated "complex adaptive systems" and the "genetic algorithms", concepts pioneered by John Holland

Bloom traced the evolution of collective intelligence to our bacterial ancestors 1 billion years ago and demonstrated how a multi-species intelligence has worked since the beginning of life Ant societies exhibit more intelligence, in terms of technology, than any other animal except for humans and co-operate in keeping livestock, for example aphids for "milking" Leaf cutters care for fungi and carry leaves to feed the fungi

David Skrbina cites the concept of a 'group mind' as being derived from Plato's concept of panpsychism that mind or consciousness is omnipresent and exists in all matter He develops the concept of a 'group mind' as articulated by Thomas Hobbes in "Leviathan" and Fechner's arguments for a collective consciousness of mankind He cites Durkheim as the most notable advocate of a "collective consciousness" and Teilhard de Chardin as a thinker who has developed the philosophical implications of the group mind/

Tom Atlee focuses primarily on humans and on work to upgrade what Howard Bloom calls "the group IQ" Atlee feels that collective intelligence can be encouraged "to overcome 'groupthink' and individual cognitive bias in order to allow a collective to cooperate on one process – while achieving enhanced intellectual performance" George Pór defined the collective intelligence phenomenon as "the capacity of human communities to evolve towards higher order complexity and harmony, through such innovation mechanisms as differentiation and integration, competition and collaboration" Atlee and Pór state that "collective intelligence also involves achieving a single focus of attention and standard of metrics which provide an appropriate threshold of action" Their approach is rooted in scientific community metaphor

The term group intelligence is sometimes used interchangeably with the term collective intelligence Anita Woolley presents Collective intelligence as a measure of group intelligence and group creativity The idea is that a measure of collective intelligence covers a broad range of features of the group, mainly group composition and group interaction The features of composition that lead to increased levels of collective intelligence in groups include criteria such as higher numbers of women in the group as well as increased diversity of the group

Atlee and Pór suggest that the field of collective intelligence should primarily be seen as a human enterprise in which mind-sets, a willingness to share and an openness to the value of distributed intelligence for the common good are paramount, though group theory and artificial intelligence have something to offer Individuals who respect collective intelligence are confident of their own abilities and recognize that the whole is indeed greater than the sum of any individual parts Maximizing collective intelligence relies on the ability of an organization to accept and develop "The Golden Suggestion", which is any potentially useful input from any member Groupthink often hampers collective intelligence by limiting input to a select few individuals or filtering potential Golden Suggestions without fully developing them to implementation

Robert David Steele Vivas in The New Craft of Intelligence portrayed all citizens as "intelligence minutemen," drawing only on legal and ethical sources of information, able to create a "public intelligence" that keeps public officials and corporate managers honest, turning the concept of "national intelligence" previously concerned about spies and secrecy on its head

Stigmergic Collaboration: a theoretical framework for mass collaboration

According to Don Tapscott and Anthony D Williams, collective intelligence is mass collaboration In order for this concept to happen, four principles need to exist;

Openness Sharing ideas and intellectual property: though these resources provide the edge over competitors more benefits accrue from allowing others to share ideas and gain significant improvement and scrutiny through collaboration Peering Horizontal organization as with the 'opening up' of the Linux program where users are free to modify and develop it provided that they make it available for others Peering succeeds because it encourages self-organization – a style of production that works more effectively than hierarchical management for certain tasks Sharing Companies have started to share some ideas while maintaining some degree of control over others, like potential and critical patent rights Limiting all intellectual property shuts out opportunities, while sharing some expands markets and brings out products faster Acting Globally The advancement in communication technology has prompted the rise of global companies at low overhead costs The internet is widespread, therefore a globally integrated company has no geographical boundaries and may access new markets, ideas and technology

Collective intelligence factor c

Scree plot showing percent of explained variance for the first factors in Woolley et al's 2010 two original studies

A new scientific understanding of collective intelligence defines it as a group's general ability to perform a wide range of tasks Definition, operationalization and statistical methods are similar to the psychometric approach of general individual intelligence Hereby, an individual's performance on a given set of cognitive tasks is used to measure general cognitive ability indicated by the general intelligence factor g extracted via factor analysis In the same vein as g serves to display between-individual performance differences on cognitive tasks, collective intelligence research aims to find a parallel intelligence factor for groups 'c factor' also called 'collective intelligence factor' CI displaying between-group differences on task performance The collective intelligence score then is used to predict how this same group will perform on any other similar task in the future Yet tasks, hereby, refer to mental or intellectual tasks performed by small groups even though the concept is hoped to be transferrable to other performances and any groups or crowds reaching from families to companies and even whole cities Since individuals' g factor scores are highly correlated with full-scale IQ scores, which are in turn regarded as good estimates of g, this measurement of collective intelligence can also be seen as an intelligence indicator or quotient respectively for a group Group-IQ parallel to an individual's intelligence quotient IQ even though the score is not a quotient per se

Mathematically, c and g are both variables summarizing positive correlations among different tasks supposing that performance on one task is comparable with performance on other similar tasks c thus is a source of variance among groups and can only be considered as a group's standing on the c factor compared to other groups in a given relevant population The concept is in contrast to competing hypotheses including other correlational structures to explain group intelligence, such as a composition out of several equally important but independent factors as found in individual personality research

Besides, this scientific idea also aims to explore the causes affecting collective intelligence, such as group size, collaboration tools or group members' interpersonal skills The MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, for instance, announced the detection of The Genome of Collective Intelligence as one of its main goals aiming to develop a taxonomy of organizational building blocks, or genes, that can be combined and recombined to harness the intelligence of crowds


Individual intelligence is shown to be genetically and environmentally influenced Analogously, collective intelligence research aims to explore reasons why certain groups perform more intelligent than other groups given that c is just moderately correlated with the intelligence of individual group members According to Woolley et al's results, neither team cohesion nor motivation or satisfaction correlated with c However, they claim that three factors were found as significant correlates: the variance in the number of speaking turns, group members' average social sensitivity and the proportion of females All three had similar predictive power for c, but only social sensitivity was statistically significant b=033, P=005

The number speaking turns indicates that "groups where a few people dominated the conversation were less collectively intelligent than those with a more equal distribution of conversational turn-taking" Hence, providing multiple team members the chance to speak up made a group more intelligent

Group members' social sensitivity was measured via the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test RME and correlated 26 with c Hereby, participants are asked to detect thinking or feeling expressed in other peoples' eyes presented on pictures and assessed in a multiple choice format The test aims to measure peoples' theory of mind ToM, also called 'mentalizing' or 'mind reading', which refers to the ability to attribute mental states, such as beliefs, desires or intents, to other people and in how far people understand that others have beliefs, desires, intentions or perspectives different from their own ones RME is a ToM test for adults that shows sufficient test-retest reliability and constantly differentiates control groups from individuals with functional autism or Asperger Syndrome It is one of the most widely accepted and well-validated tests for ToM within adults ToM can be regarded as an associated subset of skills and abilities within the broader concept of emotional intelligence

The proportion of females as a predictor of c was largely mediated by social sensitivity Sobel z = 193, P= 003 which is in vein with previous research showing that women score higher on social sensitivity tests While a mediation, statistically speaking, clarifies the mechanism underlying the relationship between a dependent and an independent variable, Wolley agreed in an interview with the Harvard Business Review that these findings are saying that groups of women are smarter than groups of men However, she relativizes this stating that the actual important thing is the high social sensitivity of group members

It is theorized that the collective intelligence factor c is an emergent property resulting from bottom-up as well as top-down processes Hereby, bottom-up processes cover aggregated group-member characteristics Top-down processes cover group structures and norms that influence a group's way of collaborating and coordinating


Predictors for the collective intelligence factor c Suggested by Woolley, Aggarwal & Malone 2015

Top-down processes

Top-down processes cover group interaction, such as structures, processes, and norms An example of such top-down processes is conversational turn-taking Research further suggest that collectively intelligent groups communicate more in general as well as more equally; same applies for participation and is shown for face-to-face as well as online groups communicating only via writing

Bottom-up processes

Bottom-up processes include group composition, namely the characteristics of group members which are aggregated to the team level encompassing An example of such bottom-up processes is the average social sensitivity or the average and maximum intelligence scores of group members Furthermore, collective intelligence was found to be related to a group's cognitive diversity including thinking styles and perspectives Groups that are moderately diverse in cognitive style have higher collective intelligence than those who are very similar in cognitive style or very different Consequently, groups where members are too similar to each other lack the variety of perspectives and skills needed to perform well On the other hand, groups whose members are too different seem to have difficulties to communicate and coordinate effectively


Standardized Regression Coefficients for the collective intelligence factor c as found in Woolley et al's 2010 two original studies c and average maximum member intelligence scores are regressed on the criterion tasks

Woolley, Chabris, Pentland, Hashmi, & Malone 2010, the originators of this scientific understanding of collective intelligence, found a single statistical factor for collective intelligence in their research across 192 groups with people randomly recruited from the public In Woolley et al's two initial studies, groups worked together on different tasks from the McGrath Task Circumplex, a well-established taxonomy of group tasks Tasks were chosen from all four quadrants of the circumplex and included visual puzzles, brainstorming, making collective moral judgments, and negotiating over limited resources The results in these tasks were taken to conduct a factor analysis Both studies showed support for a general collective intelligence factor c underlying differences in group performance with an initial eigenvalue accounting for 43% 44% in study 2 of the variance, whereas the next factor accounted for only 18% 20% That fits the range normally found in research regarding a general individual intelligence factor g typically accounting for 40% to 50% percent of between-individual performance differences on cognitive tests Afterwards, a more complex criterion task was absolved by each group measuring whether the extracted c factor had predictive power for performance outside the original task batteries Criterion tasks were playing checkers draughts against a standardized computer in the first and a complex architectural design task in the second study In a regression analysis using both individual intelligence of group members and c to predict performance on the criterion tasks, c had a significant effect, but average and maximum individual intelligence had not While average r=015, P=004 and maximum intelligence r=019, P=0008 of individual group members were moderately correlated with c, c was still a much better predictor of the criterion tasks According to Woolley et al, this supports the existence of a collective intelligence factor c, because it demonstrates an effect over and beyond group members' individual intelligence and thus that c is more than just the aggregation of the individual IQs or the influence of the group member with the highest IQ

Engel et al 2014 replicated Woolley et al's findings applying an accelerated battery of tasks with a first factor in the factor analysis explaining 49% of the between-group variance in performance with the following factors explaining less than half of this amount Moreover, they found a similar result for groups working together online communicating only via text and confirmed the role of female proportion and social sensitivity in causing collective intelligence in both cases Similarly to Wolley et al, they also measured social sensitivity with the RME which is actually meant to measure people's ability to detect mental states in other peoples' eyes The online collaborating participants, however, did neither know nor see each other at all The authors conclude that scores on the RME must be related to a broader set of abilities of social reasoning than only drawing inferences from other people's eye expressions

A collective intelligence factor c in the sense of Woolley et al was further found in groups of MBA students working together over the course of a semester, in online gaming groups as well as in groups from different cultures and groups in different contexts in terms of short-term versus long-term groups None of these investigations considered team members' individual intelligence scores as control variables

Note as well that the field of collective intelligence research is quite young and published empirical evidence is relatively rare yet However, various proposals and working papers are in progress or already completed but supposedly still in a scholarly peer reviewing publication process

Predictive validity

Next to predicting a group's performance on more complex criterion tasks as shown in the original experiments, the collective intelligence factor c was also found to predict group performance in diverse tasks in MBA classes lasting over several months Thereby, highly collectively intelligent groups earned significantly higher scores on their group assignments although their members did not do any better on other individually performed assignments Moreover, highly collective intelligent teams improved performance over time suggesting that more collectively intelligent teams learn better This is another potential parallel to individual intelligence where more intelligent people are found to acquire new material quicker

Individual intelligence can be used to predict plenty of life outcomes from school attainment and career success to health outcomes and even mortality Whether collective intelligence is able to predict other outcomes besides group performance on mental tasks has still to be investigated

Potential connections to individual intelligence

Gladwell 2008 showed that the relationship between individual IQ and success works only to a certain point and that additional IQ points over an estimate of IQ 120 do not translate into real life advantages If a similar border exists for Group-IQ or if advantages are linear and infinite, has still to be explored Similarly, demand for further research on possible connections of individual and collective intelligence exists within plenty of other potentially transferable logics of individual intelligence, such as, for instance, the development over time or the question of improving intelligence Whereas it is controversial whether human intelligence can be enhanced via training, a group's collective intelligence potentially offers simpler opportunities for improvement by exchanging team members or implementing structures and technologies Moreover, social sensitivity was found to be, at least temporarily, improvable by reading literary fiction as well as watching drama movies In how far such training ultimately improves collective intelligence through social sensitivity remains an open question

There are further more advanced concepts and factor models attempting to explain individual cognitive ability including the categorization of intelligence in fluid and crystallized intelligence or the hierarchical model of intelligence differences Further supplementing explanations and conceptualizations for the factor structure of the Genomes' of collective intelligence besides a general c factor', though, are missing yet


Other scholars explain team performance by aggregating team members' general intelligence to the team level instead of building an own overall collective intelligence measure Devine and Philips 2001 showed in a meta-analysis that mean cognitive ability predicts team performance in laboratory settings 37 as well as field settings 14 – note that this is only a small effect Suggesting a strong dependence on the relevant tasks, other scholars showed that tasks requiring a high degree of communication and cooperation are found to be most influenced by the team member with the lowest cognitive ability Tasks in which selecting the best team member is the most successful strategy, are shown to be most influenced by the member with the highest cognitive ability

Since Woolley et al's results do not show any influence of group satisfaction, group cohesiveness, or motivation, they, at least implicitly, challenge these concepts regarding the importance for group performance in general and thus contrast meta-analytically proven evidence concerning the positive effects of group cohesion, motivation and satisfaction on group performance

Noteworthy is also that the involved researchers among the confirming findings widely overlap with each other and with the authors participating in the original first study around Anita Woolley

Alternative mathematical techniques

Computational collective intelligence

Computational Collective Intelligence, by Tadeusz Szuba

In 2001, Tadeusz Tad Szuba from the AGH University in Poland proposed a formal model for the phenomenon of collective intelligence It is assumed to be an unconscious, random, parallel, and distributed computational process, run in mathematical logic by the social structure

In this model, beings and information are modeled as abstract information molecules carrying expressions of mathematical logic They are quasi-randomly displacing due to their interaction with their environments with their intended displacements Their interaction in abstract computational space creates multi-thread inference process which we perceive as collective intelligence Thus, a non-Turing model of computation is used This theory allows simple formal definition of collective intelligence as the property of social structure and seems to be working well for a wide spectrum of beings, from bacterial colonies up to human social structures Collective intelligence considered as a specific computational process is providing a straightforward explanation of several social phenomena For this model of collective intelligence, the formal definition of IQS IQ Social was proposed and was defined as "the probability function over the time and domain of N-element inferences which are reflecting inference activity of the social structure" While IQS seems to be computationally hard, modeling of social structure in terms of a computational process as described above gives a chance for approximation Prospective applications are optimization of companies through the maximization of their IQS, and the analysis of drug resistance against collective intelligence of bacterial colonies

Collective intelligence quotient

One measure sometimes applied, especially by more artificial intelligence focused theorists, is a "collective intelligence quotient" or "cooperation quotient" – which can be normalized from the "individual" intelligence quotient IQ – thus making it possible to determine the marginal intelligence added by each new individual participating in the collective action, thus using metrics to avoid the hazards of group think and stupidity



Market judgment

Because of the Internet's ability to rapidly convey large amounts of information throughout the world, the use of collective intelligence to predict stock prices and stock price direction has become increasingly viable Websites aggregate stock market information that is as current as possible so professional or amateur stock analysts can publish their viewpoints, enabling amateur investors to submit their financial opinions and create an aggregate opinion The opinion of all investor can be weighed equally so that a pivotal premise of the effective application of collective intelligence can be applied: the masses, including a broad spectrum of stock market expertise, can be utilized to more accurately predict the behavior of financial markets

Collective intelligence underpins the efficient-market hypothesis of Eugene Fama – although the term collective intelligence is not used explicitly in his paper Fama cites research conducted by Michael Jensen in which 89 out of 115 selected funds underperformed relative to the index during the period from 1955 to 1964 But after removing the loading charge up-front fee only 72 underperformed while after removing brokerage costs only 58 underperformed On the basis of such evidence index funds became popular investment vehicles using the collective intelligence of the market, rather than the judgement of professional fund managers, as an investment strategy

Predictions in politics and technology

Voting methods used in the United States 2016

Political parties mobilize large numbers of people to form policy, select candidates and finance and run election campaigns Knowledge focusing through various voting methods allows perspectives to converge through the assumption that uninformed voting is to some degree random and can be filtered from the decision process leaving only a residue of informed consensus Critics point out that often bad ideas, misunderstandings, and misconceptions are widely held, and that structuring of the decision process must favor experts who are presumably less prone to random or misinformed voting in a given context

Companies such as Affinnova acquired by Nielsen, Google, InnoCentive, Marketocracy, and Threadless have successfully employed the concept of collective intelligence in bringing about the next generation of technological changes through their research and development R&D, customer service, and knowledge management An example of such application is Google's Project Aristotle in 2012, where the effect of collective intelligence on team makeup was examined in hundreds of the company's R&D teams


Networks of trust

Application of collective intelligence in the Millennium Project

In 2012, the Global Futures Collective Intelligence System GFIS was created by The Millennium Project, which epitomizes collective intelligence as the synergistic intersection among data/information/knowledge, software/hardware, and expertise/insights that has a recursive learning process for better decision-making than the individual players alone

New media are often associated with the promotion and enhancement of collective intelligence The ability of new media to easily store and retrieve information, predominantly through databases and the Internet, allows for it to be shared without difficulty Thus, through interaction with new media, knowledge easily passes between sources Flew 2008 resulting in a form of collective intelligence The use of interactive new media, particularly the internet, promotes online interaction and this distribution of knowledge between users

Francis Heylighen, Valentin Turchin, and Gottfried Mayer-Kress are among those who view collective intelligence through the lens of computer science and cybernetics In their view, the Internet enables collective intelligence at the widest, planetary scale, thus facilitating the emergence of a global brain

The makeup of a global brain

The developer of the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee, aimed to promote sharing and publishing of information globally Later his employer opened up the technology for free use In the early '90s, the Internet's potential was still untapped, until the mid-1990s when 'critical mass', as termed by the head of the Advanced Research Project Agency ARPA, Dr JCR Licklider, demanded more accessibility and utility The driving force of this Internet-based collective intelligence is the digitization of information and communication Henry Jenkins, a key theorist of new media and media convergence draws on the theory that collective intelligence can be attributed to media convergence and participatory culture Flew 2008 He criticizes contemporary education for failing to incorporate online trends of collective problem solving into the classroom, stating "whereas a collective intelligence community encourages ownership of work as a group, schools grade individuals" Jenkins argues that interaction within a knowledge community builds vital skills for young people, and teamwork through collective intelligence communities contribute to the development of such skills Collective intelligence is not merely a quantitative contribution of information from all cultures, it is also qualitative

Lévy and de Kerckhove consider CI from a mass communications perspective, focusing on the ability of networked information and communication technologies to enhance the community knowledge pool They suggest that these communications tools enable humans to interact and to share and collaborate with both ease and speed Flew 2008 With the development of the Internet and its widespread use, the opportunity to contribute to knowledge-building communities, such as Wikipedia, is greater than ever before These computer networks give participating users the opportunity to store and to retrieve knowledge through the collective access to these databases and allow them to "harness the hive" Researchers at the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence research and explore collective intelligence of groups of people and computers

In this context collective intelligence is often confused with shared knowledge The former is the sum total of information held individually by members of a community while the latter is information that is believed to be true and known by all members of the community Collective intelligence as represented by Web 20 has less user engagement than collaborative intelligence An art project using Web 20 platforms is "Shared Galaxy", an experiment developed by an anonymous artist to create a collective identity that shows up as one person on several platforms like MySpace, Facebook, YouTube and Second Life The password is written in the profiles and the accounts named "Shared Galaxy" are open to be used by anyone In this way many take part in being one Another art project using collective intelligence to produce artistic work is Curatron, where a large group of artists together decides on a smaller group that they think would make a good collaborative group The process is used based on an algorithm computing the collective preferences In creating what he calls 'CI-Art', Nova Scotia based artist Mathew Aldred follows Pierry Levy's definition of collective intelligence Aldred's CI-Art event in March 2016 involved over four hundred people from the community of Oxford, Nova Scotia, and internationally Later work developed by Aldred used the UNU swarm intelligence system to create digital drawings and paintings The Oxford Riverside Gallery Nova Scotia held a public CI-Art event in May 2016, which connected with online participants internationally

Parenting social network and collaborative tagging as pillars for automatic IPTV content blocking system

In social bookmarking also called collaborative tagging, users assign tags to resources shared with other users, which gives rise to a type of information organisation that emerges from this crowdsourcing process The resulting information structure can be seen as reflecting the collective knowledge or collective intelligence of a community of users and is commonly called a "Folksonomy", and the process can be captured by models of collaborative tagging

Recent research using data from the social bookmarking website Delicious, has shown that collaborative tagging systems exhibit a form of complex systems or self-organizing dynamics Although there is no central controlled vocabulary to constrain the actions of individual users, the distributions of tags that describe different resources has been shown to converge over time to a stable power law distributions Once such stable distributions form, examining the correlations between different tags can be used to construct simple folksonomy graphs, which can be efficiently partitioned to obtained a form of community or shared vocabularies Such vocabularies can be seen as a form of collective intelligence, emerging from the decentralised actions of a community of users The Wall-it Project is also an example of social bookmarking

P2P business

Research performed by Tapscott and Williams has provided a few examples of the benefits of collective intelligence to business:

Talent utilization At the rate technology is changing, no firm can fully keep up in the innovations needed to compete Instead, smart firms are drawing on the power of mass collaboration to involve participation of the people they could not employ This also helps generate continual interest in the firm in the form of those drawn to new idea creation as well as investment opportunities Demand creation Firms can create a new market for complementary goods by engaging in open source community Firms also are able to expand into new fields that they previously would not have been able to without the addition of resources and collaboration from the community This creates, as mentioned before, a new market for complementary goods for the products in said new fields Costs reduction Mass collaboration can help to reduce costs dramatically Firms can release a specific software or product to be evaluated or debugged by online communities The results will be more personal, robust and error-free products created in a short amount of time and costsNew ideas can also be generated and explored by collaboration of online communities creating opportunities for free R&D outside the confines of the company

Open source software

Cultural theorist and online community developer, John Banks considered the contribution of online fan communities in the creation of the Trainz product He argued that its commercial success was fundamentally dependent upon "the formation and growth of an active and vibrant online fan community that would both actively promote the product and create content- extensions and additions to the game software"

The increase in user created content and interactivity gives rise to issues of control over the game itself and ownership of the player-created content This gives rise to fundamental legal issues, highlighted by Lessig and Bray and Konsynski, such as intellectual property and property ownership rights

Gosney extends this issue of Collective Intelligence in videogames one step further in his discussion of alternate reality gaming This genre, he describes as an "across-media game that deliberately blurs the line between the in-game and out-of-game experiences" as events that happen outside the game reality "reach out" into the player's lives in order to bring them together Solving the game requires "the collective and collaborative efforts of multiple players"; thus the issue of collective and collaborative team play is essential to ARG Gosney argues that the Alternate Reality genre of gaming dictates an unprecedented level of collaboration and "collective intelligence" in order to solve the mystery of the game


Ad-hoc communities

Military united, trade unions, and corporations satisfy some definitions of CI – the most rigorous definition would require a capacity to respond to very arbitrary conditions without orders or guidance from "law" or "customers" to constrain actionsOnline advertising companies are using collective intelligence to bypass traditional marketing and creative agencies

UNU Predicts the most important issue in presidential campagin

The UNU open platform for "human swarming" or "social swarming" establishes real-time closed-loop systems around groups of networked users molded after biological swarms, enabling human participants to behave as a unified collective intelligence When connected to UNU, groups of distributed users collectively answer questions and make predictions in real-time Early testing shows that human swarms can out-predict individuals In 2016, an UNU swarm was challenged by a reporter to predict the winners of the Kentucky Derby, and successfully picked the first four horses, in order, beating 540 to 1 odds

Specialized information sites such as Digital Photography Review or Camera Labs is an example of collective intelligence Anyone who has an access to the internet can contribute to distributing their knowledge over the world through the specialized information sites

In learner-generated context a group of users marshal resources to create an ecology that meets their needs often but not only in relation to the co-configuration, co-creation and co-design of a particular learning space that allows learners to create their own context Learner-generated contexts represent an ad hoc community that facilitates coordination of collective action in a network of trust An example of learner-generated context is found on the Internet when collaborative users pool knowledge in a "shared intelligence space" As the Internet has developed so has the concept of CI as a shared public forum The global accessibility and availability of the Internet has allowed more people than ever to contribute and access ideas Flew 2008

Games such as The Sims Series, and Second Life are designed to be non-linear and to depend on collective intelligence for expansion This way of sharing is gradually evolving and influencing the mindset of the current and future generations For them, collective intelligence has become a norm In Terry Flew's discussion of 'interactivity' in the online games environment, the ongoing interactive dialogue between users and game developers, he refers to Pierre Levy's concept of Collective Intelligence Levy 1998 and argues this is active in videogames as clans or guilds in MMORPG constantly work to achieve goals Henry Jenkins proposes that the participatory cultures emerging between games producers, media companies, and the end-users mark a fundamental shift in the nature of media production and consumption Jenkins argues that this new participatory culture arises at the intersection of three broad new media trends Firstly, the development of new media tools/technologies enabling the creation of content Secondly, the rise of subcultures promoting such creations, and lastly, the growth of value adding media conglomerates, which foster image, idea and narrative flow

Coordinating collective actions

The cast of After School Improv learns an important lesson about improvisation and life

Improvisational actors also experience a type of collective intelligence which they term "group mind", as theatrical improvisation relies on mutual cooperation and agreement, leading to the unity of "group mind"

Growth of the Internet and mobile telecom has also produced "swarming" or "rendezvous" events that enable meetings or even dates on demand The full impact has yet to be felt but the anti-globalization movement, for example, relies heavily on e-mail, cell phones, pagers, SMS and other means of organizing The Indymedia organization does this in a more journalistic way Such resources could combine into a form of collective intelligence accountable only to the current participants yet with some strong moral or linguistic guidance from generations of contributors – or even take on a more obviously democratic form to advance shared goal

A further application of collective intelligence is found in the "Community Engineering for Innovations" In such an integrated framework proposed by Ebner et al, idea competitions and virtual communities are combined to better realize the potential of the collective intelligence of the participants, particularly in open-source R&D

Alternative views

A tool for combating self-preservation

Tom Atlee reflects that, although humans have an innate ability to gather and analyze data, they are affected by culture, education and social institutions A single person tends to make decisions motivated by self-preservation Therefore, without collective intelligence, humans may drive themselves into extinction based on their selfish needs

Separation from IQism

Phillip Brown and Hugh Lauder quotes Bowles and Gintis 1976 that in order to truly define collective intelligence, it is crucial to separate 'intelligence' from IQism They go on to argue that intelligence is an achievement and can only be developed if allowed to For example, earlier on, groups from the lower levels of society are severely restricted from aggregating and pooling their intelligence This is because the elites fear that the collective intelligence would convince the people to rebel If there is no such capacity and relations, there would be no infrastructure on which collective intelligence is built Brown & Lauder 2000, p 230 This reflects how powerful collective intelligence can be if left to develop

Artificial intelligence views

Skeptics, especially those critical of artificial intelligence and more inclined to believe that risk of bodily harm and bodily action are the basis of all unity between people, are more likely to emphasize the capacity of a group to take action and withstand harm as one fluid mass mobilization, shrugging off harms the way a body shrugs off the loss of a few cells This strain of thought is most obvious in the anti-globalization movement and characterized by the works of John Zerzan, Carol Moore, and Starhawk, who typically shun academics These theorists are more likely to refer to ecological and collective wisdom and to the role of consensus process in making ontological distinctions than to any form of "intelligence" as such, which they often argue does not exist, or is mere "cleverness"

Harsh critics of artificial intelligence on ethical grounds are likely to promote collective wisdom-building methods, such as the new tribalists and the Gaians/ Whether these can be said to be collective intelligence systems is an open question Some, eg Bill Joy, simply wish to avoid any form of autonomous artificial intelligence and seem willing to work on rigorous collective intelligence in order to remove any possible niche for AI

See also

Similar concepts and applications

  • Civic intelligence
  • Collaborative intelligence
  • Shared intelligence
  • Group intelligence
  • Open source intelligence
  • Swarm intelligence
  • Collaborative filtering
  • Collaborative innovation network
  • Collective action
  • Collective decision-making
  • Collective effervescence
  • Collective memory
  • Crowd psychology
  • Epistemic democracy
  • Group behaviour
  • Knowledge ecosystem
  • Smart mob
  • Recommendation system
  • Social information processing
  • Social commerce
  • Stigmergy
  • Group mind science fiction
  • Syntality
  • Think tank
  • Wiki
  • The Wisdom of Crowds
  • Global Consciousness Project

Computation and computer science

  • Bees algorithm
  • Cellular automaton
  • Collaborative software
  • Human-based computation
  • Open-source software
  • Organismic computing
  • Collaborative human interpreter
  • Connectivity graph theory
  • Enterprise bookmarking
  • Preference elicitation


  • Customer engagement
  • Dispersed knowledge
  • Distributed cognition
  • Facilitation business
  • Facilitator
  • Hundredth monkey effect
  • Keeping up with the Joneses
  • Library
  • Library of Alexandria
  • Meme
  • Open-space meeting

Notes and references

  1. ^ a b Ngoc Thanh Nguyen 25 July 2011 Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence III Springer ISBN 978-3-642-19967-7 Retrieved 11 June 2013 
  2. ^ Glenn, Jerome C Collective Intelligence – One of the Next Big Things, Futura 4/2009, Finnish Society for Futures Studies, Helsinki, Finland
  3. ^ Glenn, Jerome C Chapter 5, 2008 State of the Future The Millennium Project, Washington, DC 2008
  4. ^ Norman Lee Johnson, Collective Science site
  5. ^ Pierre Lévy, Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace, 1994, p 13
  6. ^ Flew, Terry New Media: An Introduction Oxford University Press, 2007, p 21
  7. ^ Jenkins, Henry Convergence Culture: Where old and new media collide New York: New York University Press, 2006, p 259
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Woolley, Anita Williams; Chabris, Christopher F; Pentland, Alex; Hashmi, Nada; Malone, Thomas W 2010-10-29 "Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups" Science 330 6004: 686–688 doi:101126/science1193147 ISSN 0036-8075 PMID 20929725 
  9. ^ a b Jensen, Arthur, R 1992 "Understanding g in terms of information processing" Educational Psychology Review 4: 271–308 doi:101007/bf01417874 
  10. ^ a b c d Jensen, Arthur, R 1998 The g factor: The science of mental ability Westport, CT: Praeger 
  11. ^ Landemore, Hélène 2012 Landemore, Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many Princeton: Princeton University Press 
  12. ^ Waldron, Jeremy 1995 "The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle's Politics" Political Theory 23 4: 563–584; doi:101177/0090591795023004001 
  13. ^ Ober, Josiah 2008 Democracy and Knowledge Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press pp 110–14 
  14. ^ Cammack, Daniela 2013 "Aristotle and the Virtue of the Multitude" Political Theory 41: 175–202 doi:101177/0090591712470423 
  15. ^ Page, Scott 2008 The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies Princeton: Princeton University Press 
  16. ^ Its source can be found in this link http://skccblogtistorycom/716 wroten by story teller who belongs to SK C&C, story teller explains history of collective intelligence also, it mentioned principle of collective intelligence especially, it says William Morton Wheeler studied it at first time The title is 'collective intelligence that made us who are smarter than me'
  17. ^ Émile Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, 1912
  18. ^ "About the Book - Foundation for Conscious Evolution" Foundation for Conscious Evolution Retrieved 2016-12-04 
  19. ^ Engelbart, Douglas 1962 Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework - section on Team Cooperation
  20. ^ Engelbart, Douglas 1994Boosting Collective IQ Slide Handouts – 'Collective IQ' defined on Slide 4; also 1994 BBN Distinguished Guest Lecture Video – 'Collective IQ' defined @16:56 "CoDIAK"
  21. ^ Landemore, Helene 2013 Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many Princeton University Press 
  22. ^ Howard Bloom, The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of History, 1995
  23. ^ a b c d Howard Bloom, Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21st Century, 2000
  24. ^ Skrbina, D, 2001, Participation, Organization, and Mind: Toward a Participatory Worldview, ch 8, Doctoral Thesis, Centre for Action Research in Professional Practice, School of Management, University of Bath: England
  25. ^ Levey, Geoffrey Brahm 2015-05-01 Authenticity, Autonomy and Multiculturalism Routledge ISBN 9781317535928 
  26. ^ Skrbina, David F 2007-01-26 Panpsychism in the West 1 edition ed The MIT Press ISBN 9780262693516  CS1 maint: Extra text link
  27. ^ George Pór, Blog of Collective Intelligence
  28. ^ a b c d Atlee, Tom "Collective Intelligence as a Field of Multi‐disciplinary Study and Practice" PDF Community Intelligence CommunityIntelligence Ltd Retrieved December 11, 2016 
  29. ^ a b c d e f g h Woolley, Anita Williams; Aggarwal, Ishani; Malone, Thomas W 2015-12-01 "Collective Intelligence and Group Performance" Current Directions in Psychological Science 24 6: 420–424 doi:101177/0963721415599543 ISSN 0963-7214 
  30. ^ Leimeister, Jan Marco 2010-06-24 "Collective Intelligence" Business & Information Systems Engineering 2 4: 245–248 doi:101007/s12599-010-0114-8 ISSN 1867-0202 
  31. ^ a b Atlee, T 2008 Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence, Retrieved 26 August 2008
  32. ^ Steele, Robert David 2002-04-08 The New Craft of Intelligence: Personal, Public, & Political--Citizen's Action Handbook for Fighting Terrorism, Genocide, Disease, Toxic Bombs, & Corruption Oakton, Va: Oss Pr ISBN 9780971566118 
  33. ^ a b c d e f g h i Tapscott, D, & Williams, A D 2008 Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, USA: Penguin Group
  34. ^ Spearman, Charles, E 1904 ""General intelligence," objectively determined and measured" American Journal of Psychology 15: 201–293 doi:102307/1412107 
  35. ^ a b c d e f Engel, D; Woolley, A W; Jing, L X; Chabris, C F & Malone, T W 2014 "Reading the Mind in the Eyes or reading between the lines Theory of Mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face" PLOS ONE 9 12: e115212 doi:101371/journalpone0115212 PMC 4267836 PMID 25514387 
  36. ^ a b c d Woolley, A & Malone, T June 2011 "Defend your research: What makes a team smarter More women" Harvard Business Review 89 6: 32–33 
  37. ^ a b Kamphaus, RW; Winsor, AP; Rowe, EW & Kim, S 2005 A history of intelligence test interpretation In DP Flanagan and PL Harrison Eds, Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues 2nd Ed New York, NY: Guilford pp 23–38 
  38. ^ van der Maas, Han L J; Dolan, Conor V; Grasman, Raoul P P P; Wicherts, Jelte M; Huizenga, Hilde M; Raijmakers, Maartje E J 2006-10-01 "A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism" Psychological Review 113 4: 842–861 doi:101037/0033-295X1134842 ISSN 0033-295X PMID 17014305 
  39. ^ McCrae, R R; Costa Jr, P T 1987 "Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers" PDF Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 1: 81–90 doi:101037/0022-351452181 PMID 3820081 
  40. ^ a b c "MIT Center for Collective Intelligence" ccimitedu Retrieved 2016-04-26 
  41. ^ Briley, Daniel A; Tucker-Drob, Elliot M 2014-09-01 "Genetic and environmental continuity in personality development: a meta-analysis" Psychological Bulletin 140 5: 1303–1331 doi:101037/a0037091 ISSN 1939-1455 PMC 4152379 PMID 24956122 
  42. ^ Deary, Ian J; Spinath, Frank M; Bates, Timothy C 2006-01-01 "Genetics of intelligence" European Journal of Human Genetics 14 6: 690–700 doi:101038/sjejhg5201588 ISSN 1018-4813 
  43. ^ a b c d e Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I 2001 "The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism" Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42: 241–251 doi:101017/s0021963001006643 
  44. ^ Apperly, Ian A 2012-05-01 "What is "theory of mind" Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences" The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 5: 825–839 doi:101080/174702182012676055 ISSN 1747-0218 PMID 22533318 
  45. ^ Baron-Cohen, S, Leslie, AM,, Frith, U 1985 "Does the autistic child have a theory of mind" Cognition 21: 37–46 doi:101016/0010-02778590022-8 PMID 2934210  CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list link
  46. ^ Flavell, J H 1999-01-01 "Cognitive development: children's knowledge about the mind" Annual Review of Psychology 50: 21–45 doi:101146/annurevpsych50121 ISSN 0066-4308 PMID 10074674 
  47. ^ Premack, David; Woodruff, Guy 1978-12-01 "Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 04: 515–526 doi:101017/S0140525X00076512 ISSN 1469-1825 
  48. ^ Heyes, Cecilia M; Frith, Chris D 2014-06-20 "The cultural evolution of mind reading" Science 344 6190: 1243091 doi:101126/science1243091 ISSN 0036-8075 PMID 24948740 
  49. ^ Hallerbäck, Maria Unenge; Lugnegård, Tove; Hjärthag, Fredrik; Gillberg, Christopher 2009-03-01 "The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: Test–retest reliability of a Swedish version" Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 14 2: 127–143 doi:101080/13546800902901518 ISSN 1354-6805 PMID 19370436 
  50. ^ Pinkham, Amy E; Penn, David L; Green, Michael F; Buck, Benjamin; Healey, Kristin; Harvey, Philip D 2014-07-01 "The Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation Study: Results of the Expert Survey and RAND Panel" Schizophrenia Bulletin 40 4: 813–823 doi:101093/schbul/sbt081 ISSN 0586-7614 PMC 4059426 PMID 23728248 
  51. ^ a b Yip, Jeremy A; Côté, Stéphane 2013-01-01 "The Emotionally Intelligent Decision Maker Emotion-Understanding Ability Reduces the Effect of Incidental Anxiety on Risk Taking" Psychological Science 24 1: 48–55 doi:101177/0956797612450031 ISSN 0956-7976 PMID 23221020 
  52. ^ MacKinnon, D P 2008 Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis New York, NY: Erlbaum 
  53. ^ Woolley, A W; Aggarwal, I; Malone, T W 2015-12-01 "Collective Intelligence and Group Performance" Current Directions in Psychological Science 24 6: 420–424 doi:101177/0963721415599543 ISSN 0963-7214 
  54. ^ a b c Kim, Y J; Engel, D; Woolley, A W; Lin, J; McArthur, N & Malone, T W 2015 "Work together, play smart: Collective intelligence in League of Legends teams" Paper presented at the 2015 Collective Intelligence Conference, Santa Clara, CA 
  55. ^ Woolley, A W; Aggarwal, I; Malone, T W 2015-12-01 "Collective Intelligence and Group Performance" Current Directions in Psychological Science 24 6: 420–424 doi:101177/0963721415599543 ISSN 0963-7214 
  56. ^ a b c Aggarwal, I; Woolley, A W; Chabris, C F & Malone, T W 2015 "Cognitive diversity, collective intelligence, and learning in teams" Paper presented at the 2015 Collective Intelligence Conference, Santa Clara, CA 
  57. ^ Kozhevnikov, M; Evans, C & Kosslyn, S M 2014 "Cognitive style as environmentally sensitive individual differences in cognition: A modern synthesis and applications in education, business, and management" Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15: 3–33 doi:101177/1529100614525555 
  58. ^ McGrath, J E 1984 Groups: Interaction and Performance Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 
  59. ^ a b Engel, David; Woolley, Anita Williams; Aggarwal, Ishani; Chabris, Christopher F; Takahashi, Masamichi; Nemoto, Keiichi; Kaiser, Carolin; Kim, Young Ji; Malone, Thomas W 2015-01-01 "Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures" Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '15 New York, NY, USA: ACM: 3769–3778 doi:101145/27021232702259 ISBN 9781450331456 
  60. ^ a b c d Aggarwal, I & Woolley, AW 2014 "The effects of cognitive diversity on collective intelligence and team learning" Symposium presented at the 50th Meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology, Columbus, OH 
  61. ^ a b c Engel, D; Woolley, A W; Aggarwal, I; Chabris, C F; Takahashi, M; Nemoto, K; Malone, T W 2015 "Collective intelligence in computer-mediates collaboration emerges in different contexts and cultures" In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '15 pp 3769–3778 New York, NY: ACM 
  62. ^ "Collective Intelligence 2016" sitesgooglecom Retrieved 2016-04-27 
  63. ^ "Posters | Collective Intelligence 2015" siteslsaumichedu Retrieved 2016-04-27 
  64. ^ "Proceedings | Collective Intelligence 2014" collectivemechnorthwesternedu Retrieved 2016-04-27 
  65. ^ "Collective Intelligence 2012" arxivorg Retrieved 2016-04-27 
  66. ^ Schmidt, FL & Hunter, JE 1998 "The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings" Psychological Bulletin 124: 262–274 doi:101037/0033-29091242262 
  67. ^ Nathan, B 1997 "Intelligence, Schooling, and Society" American Psychologist 52 10: 1046–1050 
  68. ^ Strenze, Tarmo 2007-09-01 "Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research" Intelligence 35 5: 401–426 doi:101016/jintell200609004 
  69. ^ a b Deary, IJ; Weiss, A & Batty, DG 2010 "Intelligence and Personality as Predictors of Illness and Death How Researchers in Differential Psychology and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Are Collaborating to Understand and Address Health Inequalities" Psychological Science in the Public Interest 11 2: 53–79 doi:101177/1529100610387081 
  70. ^ Gladwell, M 2008 Outliers The Story of Success New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company ISBN 978-0-316-01792-3 
  71. ^ Hedden, Trey; Gabrieli, John D E 2004-02-01 "Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience" Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5 2: 87–96 doi:101038/nrn1323 ISSN 1471-003X PMID 14735112 
  72. ^ a b Shipstead, Zach; Redick, Thomas S; Engle, Randall W 2010-10-01 "Does working memory training generalize" Psychologica Belgica 50 3-4: 245 doi:105334/pb-50-3-4-245 ISSN 2054-670X 
  73. ^ a b Buschkuehl, M; Jaeggi, SM 2010 "Improving intelligence a literature review" Swiss Medical Weekly 140 19: 266–72 
  74. ^ Kidd, David Comer; Castano, Emanuele 2013-10-18 "Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind" Science 342 6156: 377–380 doi:101126/science1239918 ISSN 0036-8075 PMID 24091705 
  75. ^ Black, Jessica; Barnes, Jennifer L "Fiction and social cognition: The effect of viewing award-winning television dramas on theory of mind" Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9 4: 423–429 doi:101037/aca0000031 
  76. ^ Malone, T W & Bernstein, MS 2015 Handbook of Collective Intelligence Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 
  77. ^ Horn, J 1989 Models of intelligence In RL Linn Ed, Intelligence: Measurement, theory, and public policy pp 29–73 Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press 
  78. ^ Cattell, R B 1971 Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action Houghton Mifflin: New York, NY 
  79. ^ Carroll, JB 1993 Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press 
  80. ^ Johnson, Wendy; Bouchard Jr, Thomas J 2005-07-01 "The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation VPR, not fluid and crystallized" Intelligence 33 4: 393–416 doi:101016/jintell200412002 
  81. ^ "MIT Center for Collective Intelligence" ccimitedu Retrieved 2016-04-27 
  82. ^ LePine, Jeffery A "Adaptation of Teams in Response to Unforeseen Change: Effects of Goal Difficulty and Team Composition in Terms of Cognitive Ability and Goal Orientation" Journal of Applied Psychology 90 6: 1153–1167 doi:101037/0021-90109061153 
  83. ^ Tziner, Aharon; Eden, Dov "Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts" Journal of Applied Psychology 70 1: 85–93 doi:101037/0021-901070185 
  84. ^ Devine, Dennis J; Philips, Jennifer L 2001-10-01 "Do Smarter Teams Do Better A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Ability and Team Performance" Small Group Research 32 5: 507–532 doi:101177/104649640103200501 ISSN 1046-4964 
  85. ^ O'Brien, G; Owens, A 1969 "Effects of organizational structure on correlations between member abilities and group productivity" Journal of Applied Psychology 53: 525–530 doi:101037/h0028659 
  86. ^ Evans, Charles R; Dion, Kenneth L 1991-05-01 "Group Cohesion and Performance A Meta-Analysis" Small Group Research 22 2: 175–186 doi:101177/1046496491222002 ISSN 1046-4964 
  87. ^ Gully, Stanley M; Devine, Dennis J; Whitney, David J 2012-12-01 "A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance Effects of Level of Analysis and Task Interdependence" Small Group Research 43 6: 702–725 doi:101177/1046496412468069 ISSN 1046-4964 
  88. ^ Beal, Daniel J; Cohen, Robin R; Burke, Michael J; McLendon, Christy L December 2003 "Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations" Journal of Applied Psychology 88 6: 989–1004 doi:101037/0021-9010886989 PMID 14640811 
  89. ^ O'leary-kelly, Anne M; Martocchio, Joseph J; Frink, Dwight D 1994-10-01 "A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance" Academy of Management Journal 37 5: 1285–1301 doi:102307/256673 ISSN 0001-4273 
  90. ^ Kleingeld, Ad; Mierlo, Heleen van; Arends, Lidia "The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis" Journal of Applied Psychology 96 6: 1289–1304 doi:101037/a0024315 
  91. ^ Duffy, M K; Shaw, J D & Stark, E M 2000 "Performance and satisfaction in conflicted interdependent groups: When and how does selfesteem make a difference" Academy of Management Journal 43: 772–782 doi:102307/1556367 
  92. ^ a b c d e f g Szuba T, Computational Collective Intelligence, 420 pages, Wiley NY, 2001
  93. ^ Kowalczyk, Ryszard 2009-09-23 Computational Collective Intelligence Semantic Web, Social Networks and Multiagent Systems: First International Conference, ICCCI 2009, Wroclaw, Poland, October 5-7, 2009, Proceedings Springer Science & Business Media ISBN 9783642044403 
  94. ^ Kowalczyk, Ryszard 2009-09-23 Computational Collective Intelligence Semantic Web, Social Networks and Multiagent Systems: First International Conference, ICCCI 2009, Wroclaw, Poland, October 5-7, 2009, Proceedings Springer Science & Business Media ISBN 9783642044403 
  95. ^ Administrator "About Collective IQ - Doug Engelbart Institute" wwwdougengelbartorg Retrieved 2016-12-11 
  96. ^ a b Kaplan, Craig A 2001 "COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE: A NEW APPROACH TO STOCK PRICE FORECASTING" PDF Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference 
  97. ^ Ma, Ying; Li, Guanyi; Dong, Yingsai; Qin, Zengchang 2010 "Minority Game Data Mining for Stock Market Predictions" PDF Agents and Data Mining Interaction, 6th International Workshopon Agents and Data Mining Interaction, ADMI 2010 doi:101007/978-3-642-15420-1 
  98. ^ Yu, Du; Dong, Yingsai; Qin, Zengchang; Wan, Tao 2011 "Exploring Market Behaviors with Evolutionary Mixed-Games Learning Model" PDF Computational Collective Intelligence Technologies and Applications – Third International Conference, ICCCI 2011: 244–253 doi:101007/978-3-642-23935-9_24 
  99. ^ Fama, EF 1970 "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work" Journal of Finance 25 2: 383–417 doi:102307/2325486 
  100. ^ a b Jensen, MC 1967 "The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964" Journal of Finance 23 2: 389–416 doi:101111/j1540-62611968tb00815x 
  101. ^ a b "Vote amount according to "intelligence"" politicsstackexchangecom Retrieved 2016-12-12 
  102. ^ "Landemore, H: Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many eBook and Paperback" pressprincetonedu Retrieved 2016-12-04 
  103. ^ a b Bonabeau, E 2009 "The power of collective intelligence" MIT Sloan Management Review 50: 45–52 
  104. ^ Malone, Thomas W; Laubacher, Robert; Dellarocas, Chrysanthos 2009-02-03 "Harnessing Crowds: Mapping the Genome of Collective Intelligence" Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network 
  105. ^ Duhigg, Charles 2016-02-25 "What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team" The New York Times ISSN 0362-4331 Retrieved 2016-12-11 
  106. ^ "Global Futures Intelligence System" wwwmillennium-projectorg Retrieved 2016-12-07 
  107. ^ "Global Futures Intelligence System" wwwmillennium-projectorg Retrieved 2016-12-11 
  108. ^ a b Weiss, A 2005 The Power of Collective Intelligence Collective Intelligence, pp 19–23
  109. ^ a b Henry, Jenkins "INTERACTIVE AUDIENCES THE 'COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE' OF MEDIA FANS" PDF Retrieved December 11, 2016 
  110. ^ Flew, Terry 2008 New Media: an introduction Melbourne: Oxford University Press 
  111. ^ MIT Center for Collective Intelligence Ccimitedu Retrieved on 2013-07-13
  112. ^ Jenkins, H 2006 Convergence Culture New York: New York University Press
  113. ^ Scardamalia, Marlene; Bereiter, Carl 1994-07-01 "Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities" Journal of the Learning Sciences 3 3: 265–283 doi:101207/s15327809jls0303_3 ISSN 1050-8406 
  114. ^ Math Takes the Guessing Out of Artistic Collaboration, Vocativcom, 07/09/2014
  115. ^ Mathew Aldred, May 2016 ""What is Collective Intelligence Art"" 2016 
  116. ^ Amherst News Citizen Record, March 17, 2016 ""Community creation taking place in Oxford"" 2016 
  117. ^ Oxford Regional Education Centre""Nexus OREC"" 2016 
  118. ^ UNU Interview with artist, May 23, 2016 ""Artwork from an emergent hive mind"" 2016 
  119. ^ Oxford Riverside Gallery News, May 2016 ""CI-Art event at Oxford Riverside Gallery 'Nexus' opening"" 2016 
  120. ^ a b Millen, David R; Feinberg, Jonathan; Kerr, Bernard 2006-01-01 "Dogear: Social Bookmarking in the Enterprise" Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '06 New York, NY, USA: ACM: 111–120 doi:101145/11247721124792 ISBN 1595933727 
  121. ^ a b Harry Halpin, Valentin Robu, Hana Shepherd The Complex Dynamics of Collaborative Tagging, Proceedings 6th International Conference on the World Wide Web WWW'07, Banff, Canada, pp 211–220, ACM Press, 2007
  122. ^ Fu, Wai-Tat 2010 "Semantic imitation in social tagging" ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction doi:101145/14605631460600 
  123. ^ Fu, Wai-Tat Aug 2009 "A Semantic Imitation Model of Social Tagging" Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Social Computing: 66–72 
  124. ^ Valentin Robu, Harry Halpin, Hana Shepherd Emergence of consensus and shared vocabularies in collaborative tagging systems, ACM Transactions on the Web TWEB, Vol 34, article 14, ACM Press, September 2009
  125. ^ Carlos J Costa, January 2012 "Article on Wall-it project" 2012 
  126. ^ John AL Banks Negotiating Participatory Culture in the New Media Environment: Auran and the Trainz Online Community – An Impossible Relation, The University of Queensland School of English, Media Studies and Art History MelbourneDAC2003
  127. ^ L, Lessig,2006Code Version 20 2nd ed New York: Basic Books
  128. ^ Bray, DA & Konsynski, BR, 2007, Virtual Worlds, Virtual Economies, Virtual Institutions, viewed 10 October 2008, p 1-27 <http://ssrncom/abstract=962501>
  129. ^ a b Gosney, JW, 2005, Beyond Reality: A Guide to Alternate Reality Gaming, Thomson Course Technology, Boston
  130. ^ Lee,Sang M,et al "Success factors of platform leadership in web 20 service business" Service Business 42 2010: 89-103
  131. ^ http://newsdiscoverycom/human/life/swarms-of-humans-power-a-i-platform-150603htm
  132. ^ https://mitpressmitedu/sites/default/files/titles/content/ecal2015/ch117html
  133. ^ Rosenberg, LB, "Human swarming, a real-time method for parallel distributed intelligence," in Swarm/Human Blended Intelligence Workshop SHBI, 2015 , vol, no, pp1-7, 28-29 Sept 2015 doi: 101109/SHBI20157321685
  134. ^ http://siteslsaumichedu/collectiveintelligence/wp-content/uploads/sites/176/2015/05/Rosenberg-CI-2015-Abstractpdf
  135. ^ http://wwwnewsweekcom/artificial-intelligence-turns-20-11000-kentucky-derby-bet-457783
  136. ^ https://wwwwashingtonpostcom/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/06/02/what-happened-when-an-ai-hive-mind-answered-reddits-burning-politics-questions/
  137. ^ "Digital Photography Review" wwwdpreviewcom Retrieved 2016-12-07 
  138. ^ "Camera reviews, DSLR reviews, lens reviews, photography guides | Cameralabs" wwwcameralabscom Retrieved 2016-12-07 
  139. ^ Luckin, R, du Boulay, B, Smith, H, Underwood, J, Fitzpatrick, G, Holmberg, J, Kerawalla, L, Tunley, H, Brewster, D and Pearce, D 2005, 'Using Mobile Technology to Create Flexible Learning Contexts ' Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 22
  140. ^ Luckin, R 2006, Understanding Learning Contexts as Ecologies of Resources: From the Zone of Proximal Development to Learner Generated Contexts Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Conference on Elearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006
  141. ^ Luckin, R, Shurville, S and Browne, T 2007, 'Initiating elearning by stealth, participation and consultation in a late majority institution' Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 3, 4, 317–332
  142. ^ Flew, Terry and Humphreys, Sal 2005 "Games: Technology, Industry, Culture" in Terry Flew, New Media: An Introduction 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, South Melbourne 101-114
  143. ^ Henry Jenkins 2002 in Flew, Terry and Humphreys, Sal 2005 Games: Technology, Industry, Culture in Terry Flew, New Media: An Introduction 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, South Melbourne 101-114
  144. ^ a b Vera, Dusya; Crossan, Mary 2004-06-01 "Theatrical Improvisation: Lessons for Organizations" Organization Studies 25 5: 727–749 doi:101177/0170840604042412 ISSN 0170-8406 
  145. ^ , R Keith Sawyer 2004-06-01 "Improvised lessons: collaborative discussion in the constructivist classroom" Teaching Education 15 2: 189–201 doi:101080/1047621042000213610 ISSN 1047-6210 
  146. ^ Wolpert, David H; Tumer, Kagan; Frank, Jeremy 1999-05-10 "Using Collective Intelligence to Route Internet Traffic" arXiv:cs/9905004 
  147. ^ Held, David; McGrew, Anthony 2007-11-19 Globalization / Anti-Globalization: Beyond the Great Divide Polity ISBN 9780745639116 
  148. ^ a b "'Anti-Globals' Use Internet As Collective Intelligence - UK Indymedia" wwwindymediaorguk Retrieved 2016-12-11 
  149. ^ Jan Marco Leimeister, Michael Huber, Ulrich Bretschneider, Helmut Krcmar 2009: Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition In: Journal of Management Information Systems 2009, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Publisher: ME Sharpe Inc, Pages: 197–224, ISSN 0742-1222, doi:102753/MIS0742-1222260108 , Winfried Ebner; Jan Marco Leimeister; Helmut Krcmar 2009: Community Engineering for Innovations – The Ideas Competition as a method to nurture a Virtual Community for Innovations In: R&D Management, 39 4,pp 342–356 doi:101111/j1467-9310200900564x
  150. ^ Ebner, Winfried; Leimeister, Jan Marco; Krcmar, Helmut 2009-09-01 "Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations" R&D Management 39 4: 342–356 doi:101111/j1467-9310200900564x ISSN 1467-9310 
  151. ^ Abdul-Karim, Kashif 2015-11-23 In Search of The Black Seed Lulucom ISBN 9781329694897 
  152. ^ a b c "Capitalism and Social Progress by Phillip Brown and Hugh Lauder cont " The Guardian 2001-06-18 ISSN 0261-3077 Retrieved 2016-12-12 
  153. ^ a b c "John Zerzan: anti-civilization theorist, writer and speaker" wwwjohnzerzannet Retrieved 2016-12-12 
  154. ^ a b c Moore, Jason W 2001-01-01 Arrighi, Giovanni; Silver, Beverly J, eds "Globalization in Historical Perspective" Science & Society 65 3: 386–397 doi:101521/siso65338617767 JSTOR 40403938 
  155. ^ a b c Moore, Jason W 2001-01-01 Arrighi, Giovanni; Silver, Beverly J, eds "Globalization in Historical Perspective" Science & Society 65 3: 386–397 doi:101521/siso65338617767 JSTOR 40403938 
  156. ^ "m e t a m o r p h o p t i c s" metamorphopticsblogspotcom Retrieved 2016-12-12 
  157. ^ Joy, Bill "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us" WIRED Retrieved 2016-12-12 


  • Brown, Philip; Lauder, Hugh 2000 "Collective intelligence" In S Baron, J Field & T Schuller Social Capital: Critical Perspectives New York: Oxford University Press  CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter link
  • Brown, Philip; Lauder, Hugh 2001 "Collective intelligence chapter 13" In Brown & Lauder Capitalism and social progress: the future of society in a global economy Palgrave  CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter link
  • Fadul, Jose A 2009 "Collective Learning: Applying Distributed Cognition for Collective Intelligence" The International Journal of Learning Common Ground 16 4: 211–220 doi:1018848/1447-9494/cgp/v16i04/46223 ISSN 1447-9494 
  • CIA 2008 The World Factbook accessed 3 September 2008
  • Flew, Terry 2008 New Media: an introduction Melbourne: Oxford University Press 
  • Hofstadter, Douglas 1979 Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid New York: Basic Books 
  • Leiner, Barry, Cerf, Vinton, Clark, David, Kahn, Robert, Kleinrock, Leonard, Lynch, Daniel, Postel, Jon, Roberts, Larry and Wolff, Stephen 2003 A Brief History of the Internet Version 332 accessed 3 September 2008
  • Noubel, Jean-François; 2004, rev 2007, "Collective Intelligence: the Invisible Revolution"
  • Por, George 1995 "The Quest for Collective intelligence" In K Gozdz Community Building: Renewing Spirit and Learning in Business San Francisco: New Leaders Press 
  • Rheingold, Howard 2002 Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution Basic Books 
  • Ron, Sun 1979 Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction Cambridge University Press 
  • Rosenberg, L 2015 Human Swarms, a real time method for Collective Intelligence Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life ECAL 2015, pp 658–659
  • Riedl, Christoph; Blohm, Ivo; Leimeister, Jan Marco; Krcmar, Helmut 2010 "Rating Scales for Collective Intelligence in Innovation Communities: Why Quick and Easy Decision Making Does Not Get It Right" PDF 
  • Leimeister, Jan Marco 2010 Collective "Intelligence" 
  • Roy Chowdhury, Soudip; Rodriguez, Carlos; Daniel, Florian; Casati, Fabio 2010 "Wisdom-aware computing: on the interactive recommendation of composition knowledge" 
  • Stephen R Diasio, Nuria Agell, "The evolution of expertise in decision support technologies: A challenge for organizations," cscwd, pp 692–697, 2009 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, 2009 http://wwwcomputerorg/portal/web/csdl/doi/101109/CSCWD20094968139
  • Raven, Jean, ed 2008 Uses and Abuses of Intelligence Unionville NY: Royal Fireworks Press ISBN 978-0-89824-356-7 Lay summary 6 July 2010 
  • Kaiser, C, Kröckel, J, Bodendorf, F 2010 Swarm Intelligence for Analyzing Opinions in Online Communities Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp 1–9

External links

  • Blog of Collective Intelligence
  • GFIS – Global Futures Intelligence System
  • CIRI – the Collective Intelligence Research Institute - a R&D non-profit organization on collective intelligence
  • An application of Collective Intelligence for the Global Climate Change Situation Room designed and implemented by The Millennium Project in Gimcheon, South Korea in 2009
  • MIT Handbook of Collective Intelligence
  • Cultivating Society's Civic Intelligence Doug Schuler Journal of Society, Information and Communication, vol 4 No 2
  • Jennifer H Watkins 2007 Prediction Markets as an Aggregation Mechanism for Collective Intelligence Los Alamos National Laboratory article on Collective Intelligence
  • Hideyasu Sasaki 2010 International Journal of Organizational and Collective Intelligence IJOCI, vol 1 No 1
  • Olivier Zara, Managing Collective Intelligence, Toward a New Corporate Governance, Axiopole editions, 2004
  • The collective intelligence framework, open-source framework for leveraging collective intelligence
  • Raimund Minichbauer 2012 Fragmented Collectives On the Politics of "Collective Intelligence" in Electronic Networks, transversal 01 12, 'unsettling knowledges'

collective intelligence, collective intelligence book, collective intelligence crossword, collective intelligence examples, collective intelligence framework, collective intelligence henry jenkins, collective intelligence in education, collective intelligence pdf, collective intelligence solution group ag, collective intelligence system

Collective intelligence Information about

Collective intelligence

  • user icon

    Collective intelligence beatiful post thanks!


Collective intelligence
Collective intelligence
Collective intelligence viewing the topic.
Collective intelligence what, Collective intelligence who, Collective intelligence explanation

There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video

Random Posts

Body politic

Body politic

The body politic is a metaphor that regards a nation as a corporate entity,2 likened to a human body...


Kakamega is a town in western Kenya lying about 30 km north of the Equator It is the headquarte...
Academic year

Academic year

An academic year is a period of time which schools, colleges and universities use to measure a quant...
Lucrezia Borgia

Lucrezia Borgia

Lucrezia Borgia Italian pronunciation: luˈkrɛttsja ˈbɔrdʒa; Valencian: Lucrècia Borja luˈkrɛsia...