Fri . 20 Aug 2020
TR | RU | UK | KK | BE |

Block booking

block booking, block booking driving lessons
Block booking is a system of selling multiple films to a theater as a unit Block booking was the prevailing practice among Hollywood's major studios from the turn of the 1930s until it was outlawed by the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v Paramount Pictures, Inc 1948 Under block booking, "independent 'unaffiliated' theater owners were forced to take large numbers of a studio's pictures sight unseen Those studios could then parcel out second-rate product along with A-class features and star vehicles, which made both production and distribution operations more economical"1 The element of the system involving the purchase of unseen pictures is known as blind bidding


  • 1 Origins in the silent era
  • 2 The system's growth and demise
  • 3 Notes
  • 4 Sources

Origins in the silent eraedit

Paramount Pictures, under Adolph Zukor's leadership, was largely responsible for introducing the practice of block booking to Hollywood:

At a time when star prominence was the single most important factor determining a film's box-office success, Zukor had cornered the market In a 1918 popularity pollthe six top stars on the list—Mary Pickford, Marguerite Clark, Douglas Fairbanks, Harold Lockwood, William S Hart, and Wallace Reid—were all under contract to Zukor

Using this leverage, Paramount was able to insist that prospective exhibitors interested in, say, the Pickford films, acquire them in large blocks along with a quantity of less attractive titles These block-booking arrangements typically included groups of from 13 to 52 or even 104 titles Paramount salesmen offered a variety of different product lines, from the top-quality Artcraft releases of Pickford, Fairbanks, and Hart to the more modest Realart productions, in which stars such as Bebe Daniels were being developed Because these films had not yet been produced, exhibitors were required to "buy blind" from a sketchy prospectus or campaign book2

All of the other major studios, with the exception of United Artists, ultimately copied these policies to varying degrees For much of the 1920s, Paramount and growing Warner Bros, in particular, "relied heavily on block booking and blind bidding"1 Already, in 1921 the Federal Trade Commission had launched an investigation of the studios' booking practices that would last for eleven years A 1927 cease-and-desist order was disregarded by the majors3

The system's growth and demiseedit

With Hollywood's conversion to sound film in the late 1920s, block booking increasingly became standard practice: in order to get access to a studio's attractive A pictures, many theaters were obliged to rent the company's entire output for a season4 Paramount Pictures President Adolph Zukor obtained the Paramount-Publix chains of theaters that totaled in 1,200 screens, and insisted that the exhibitors and independent theaters sign a contract with their company if they wanted the exclusive, top-of-the-line Paramount productions5 With a whole season's worth of films offered up on an all-or-nothing basis, theaters weren't just bidding on movies they hadn't seen, but on many movies not yet even made This was also called "blind-bidding" because, other than knowing the genre, the actors and actresses, and a brief overview of the plot, the exhibitors knew nothing about the films they were acquiring In one case, Zukor had pressured theater operators to buy a block of one hundred and four films each year and forced them to show two films per week, for fifty-two consecutive weeks5 With the B movies—less expensively produced films intended to run as the lower half of double features—rented at a flat fee rather than the box office percentage basis of A films, rates could be set that essentially guaranteed the profitability of every B movie Block booking and blind bidding meant that the majors didn't have to worry over much about the quality of these B pictures:

Knowing that even the poorest picture would find an outlet, the studios could operate at full capacity In the process, the majors shifted the risks of production financing to the independent exhibitor The long-term effects of the policy also stifled competition by foreclosing the market to independent producers and distributors In short, block booking allowed the majors to wrest the greatest amount of profits from the marketplace6

Along with the blocks of features, exhibitors were required to take the major's shorts as well—a practice known as full-line forcing7 The smaller Hollywood studios—known collectively as Poverty Row—didn't have the big pictures with A-list stars that would have allowed them to compel theater owners to directly block book Instead, they mostly sold exclusive regional distribution rights to so-called states' rights firms These distributors in turn marketed blocks of movies to exhibitors, typically six or more pictures featuring the same star given that the films' source was Poverty Row, a relatively minor star8 In July 1938, the Justice Department's antitrust division filed a suit, United States v Paramount Pictures, Inc et al, charging the eight major Hollywood studios with violating the Sherman Antitrust Act

The Sherman Trust Act of 1890 controlled the interstate commerce with different trust-busting provisions and were brought to bear against studio system monopolistic activities5 Block booking and blind bidding were at the heart of the practices charged as illegally monopolistic9 The Department of Justice filed suit against the distribution arms of Hollywood studios in the Famous Players-Lasky antitrust case of 1928 The Department of Justice charged the ten entities that controlled ninety eight percent of the domestic theatrical distribution Appeals were filed and the studios were able to prevent charges from being followed through until 1929, due to the collapse of the stock market and the Great Depression happening at the same time, making this issue moot5 The major studios controlled the programming of their theaters and also had negotiated wide-ranging distribution deals that constricted the financial state of independent theaters

On October 29, 1940, the Big Five studios Loews/MGM, Paramount, 20th Century-Fox, Warner Bros-First National, and RKO—the majors that owned large theater chains signed a consent decree in an attempt to settle the case It provided, among other things, that "block booking would continue, but in blocks no larger than five films; trade shows would be held regularly to provide exhibitors with advance screenings; and forcing of shorts and newsreels was banned"10 Because the decree was forged after the September 1 beginning of the 1940–41 exhibition season, the new blocks-of-five arrangement did not go into effect until the 1941–42 season11 When the consent decree lapsed in 1942, most of the majors continued with blocks of five, though MGM went with blocks of twelve for two years In contrast, Warner Bros abandoned blocks altogether in 194312 The practice was entirely outlawed by the Supreme Court's 1948 decision, United States v Paramount et al, against the studios in the Paramount antitrust case13

In concurrence with decisions held by the lower courts, the Supreme Court ruled that all of the major movie studios had prevented domestic and foreign competition through their control over theaters In its 1948 decision, the Supreme Court ordered the elimination of block booking and demanded a separation of theater holdings from production and distribution Without control over block booking, studios feared that they could no longer force theaters to buy up to 400 movies each year In anticipation of mass profit-loss, studios cut production schedules and terminated contracts with actors, producers, directors and other staff Newly unemployed artists began pursuing careers in television As popular movie actors transitioned from the silver screen to the television screen, viewers followed their favorite artists to the new medium In 1951, almost all cities with television stations saw a significant increase in movie theater closures corresponding with a simultaneous increase in television viewership The substantial rise in television’s popularity during the 1950s can be largely attributed to the Supreme Court’s decision to outlaw block booking13


  1. ^ a b Schatz 1988, p 39
  2. ^ Koszarski 1990, pp 71-72
  3. ^ Koszarski 1990, p 72
  4. ^ Schatz 1988, pp 74-75
  5. ^ a b c d Torre 2009, p 503
  6. ^ Balio 1993, p 20
  7. ^ Balio 1993, p 19
  8. ^ Taves 1993, pp 326–327
  9. ^ Schatz 1997, pp 15-16
  10. ^ Schatz 1997, p 20
  11. ^ Schatz 1997, p 21
  12. ^ Schatz 1997, pp 45, 72, 160–161
  13. ^ a b Barnouw 1990


  • Balio, Tino 1993 Grand Design: Hollywood as a Modern Business Enterprise, 1930-1939 Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press published 1995 ISBN 0-520-20334-8 
  • Barnouw, Erik 1990 Tube of Plenty: The Evolution of American Television 2nd Revised ed New York: Oxford University Press ISBN 0-19-506484-4 
  • Koszarski, Richard 1990 An Evening's Entertainment: The Age of the Silent Feature Picture, 1915-1928 Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press published 1994 ISBN 0-520-08535-3 
  • Schatz, Thomas 1988 The Genius of the System: Hollywood Filmmaking in the Studio Era London: Faber & Faber published 1998 ISBN 0-571-19596-2 
  • Schatz, Thomas 1997 Boom and Bust: American Cinema in the 1940s Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press published 1999 ISBN 0-520-22130-3 
  • Taves, Brian 1993 "Chapter 8: The B Film: Hollywood's Other Half" In Balio, Tino Grand Design: Hollywood as a Modern Business Enterprise, 1930-1939 Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press published 1995 pp 313–350 ISBN 0-520-20334-8 
  • Torre, Paul J 2009 "Block Booking Migrates to Television: The Rise and Fall of the International Output Deal" Television & New Media 10 6: 501–520 ISSN 1527-4764 doi:101177/1527476409343797 Subscription required help 

block booking, block booking and bling bidding, block booking decision, block booking driving lessons, block booking economics, block booking in film, block booking meaning, block booking restaurant, block booking studio system, block booking with dr bill blatchford

Block booking Information about

Block booking

  • user icon

    Block booking beatiful post thanks!


Block booking
Block booking
Block booking viewing the topic.
Block booking what, Block booking who, Block booking explanation

There are excerpts from wikipedia on this article and video

Random Posts



The Picts were a tribal confederation of peoples who lived in what is today eastern and northern Sco...
Visual prosthesis

Visual prosthesis

A visual prosthesis, often referred to as a bionic eye, is an experimental visual device intended to...
Mini rugby

Mini rugby

Mini rugby, also known as New Image Rugby, is a form of rugby union designed to introduce the sport ...
List of synthetic polymers

List of synthetic polymers

Synthetic polymers are human-made polymers From the utility point of view they can be classified int...